The goal of quantitative methods such as MRF is to provide a quantitative characterization of tissue physiology and pathology. These data are displayed as images to convey both geographic/anatomical information and quantitative physical property measurements. But this also means that the manner in which the information is displayed is critical. Here we propose several color map alternatives that have been optimized for use in MRF. It is hoped that the use and further optimization of these maps by the community will further improve our ability to visualize and understand this kind of quantitative data.
The goal of quantitative methods such as MRF is to provide a quantitative characterization of tissue physiology and pathology. These data are displayed as images to convey both geographic/anatomical information and quantitative physical property measurements. But this also means that the manner in which the information is displayed is critical. Color can be incredibly useful in visualizing this kind of data. Humans can perceive differences in color where differences in brightness are difficult to distinguish. Color can also help sort information into well-defined groups better than a simple grayscale representation. This is particularly useful in MRF where multiple tissue properties are imaged simultaneously. Having a clear way to intuitively separate out different maps from one another visually (e.g. T1 vs T2 maps) makes the interpretation of the data significantly easier.
Unfortunately, there are an infinite number of possibilities for displaying this information in color and some of these choices are actually harmful to our task in medical imaging. Extra edges can be added to the display, or alternatively edges can be diminished, either of which can lead to misdiagnosis. There should also be a consistent ability to distinguish differences in the underlying values across the entire range of the colormaps. Poor choices can lead to perceptual problems as well, especially for people with color blindness. High or low values shouldn’t be linked to an individual hue alone, since there is no intrinsic ordering between different colors. For example, there is no intuitive reason why a red color would indicate a higher T1 value as compared to a blue value. Ideally a colormap should always provide a clear perceptual understanding across the entire range of the data. MRF has the additional constraint that the data often have a large dynamic range (as in T2 maps) and require dedicated maps in order to display all of the information throughout the range with equal visual weighting.
Rainbow or jet colormaps are the worst and are actually harmful. It is not just our opinion1.
Researchers in quantitative MRI and MRF should stop using them. These colormaps introduce artificial edges in some parts of the range, completely hide edges in other parts of the range and lack any kind of intuitive perceptual ordering. See Figure 1.