Adam Johansson1, James M Balter1, and Yue Cao1,2,3
1Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 2Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, 3Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Synopsis
The multidimensional fast Fourier transform (MFFT) for
arbitrary n-dimensional periodic grids allows images with non-cuboid voxels and
fields of view (FOV) to be reconstructed efficiently. In this study, we apply
the MFFT with a modified Smith normal form to iterative k-t SENSE reconstruction
of data from a golden-angle stack-of-stars DCE-MRI sequence to produce a 4-D image
with a non-cuboid FOV tailored to fit tight around the imaged subject. Compared
to FFT-based reconstruction on a tight-fitting cuboid FOV, the non-cuboid MFFT reduced
reconstruction time by 18% and memory usage by 11% while producing voxel values
identical to those found in the reconstruction domain of the cuboid FOV.
Introduction
Iterative k-t SENSE (1) reconstruction relies on the fast
Fourier transform (FFT) for speed. A simple strategy to reduce reconstruction
time is to make the cuboid reconstruction field of view (FOV) fit tight around
the imaged object, thereby reducing the size of the data array that must be
transformed with the FFT. Further tailoring can be achieved using a
hexagonal FOV (2). For the general case, the
multidimensional fast Fourier transform (MFFT) (3,4) can be used to Fourier
transform any n-dimensional periodic grid
and thereby enables fast reconstruction of images with arbitrary non-cuboid
voxels and FOVs (Fig. 1). We demonstrate that the reconstruction time for iterative
k-t SENSE can be reduced without loss of image quality by tailoring a tight subject-specific
non-cuboid FOV to the subject.Method
Following administration of a Gd-based contrast agent, a subject was scanned with a 3-D golden-angle stack-of-starts gradient-echo sequence (5) for 6 min as part of a pilot study of individualized adaptive radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. A 4-D image was reconstructed by solving the regularized normal equation $$$(E^HE + R)\mathbf{x} = E^H\mathbf{y}$$$ using the conjugate gradient (CG) method, where $$$\mathbf{x}$$$ are the pixel values of the 4-D image to reconstruct inside a reconstruction domain (Fig. 2), $$$\mathbf{y}$$$ are the samples collected in k-space, $$$E$$$ is the encoding matrix and $$$R$$$ is a regularizer determined from prior knowledge of the SNR in x-f space (1). The reconstruction domain was chosen as the convex hull of the subject’s external contour plus a 1-cm margin (Fig. 2). $$$E^H\mathbf{y}$$$ was calculated using NUFFTs (6–8) and estimated coil sensitivity profiles whereas $$$E^HE$$$ was rewritten as $$$\sum_iS_i^HZ^H\mathcal{F}^HW\mathcal{F}ZS_i$$$ where $$$S_i$$$ are the coil sensitivity profiles, $$$Z$$$ is a zero-filling operator that pads the reconstruction domain to the size of the MFFT FOV (Fig. 3), $$$W$$$ is the Fourier transform of the point-spread function (PSF) produced by the radial k-space sampling pattern and $$$\mathcal{F}$$$ is the Fourier transform. The non-cuboid MFFT FOV was selected in a two-step procedure. First, a tight FOV was chosen as that which most densely packed the reconstruction domain without overlap (Fig. 3). Second, this FOV was doubled to avoid PSF wrap around (9). The MFFT was implemented by diagonalizing the periodicity matrix, $$$P$$$, of the FOV into a modified Smith normal form (SNF), $$$P=UDV^T$$$, and then using conventional FFT software on the image array permuted according to the unimodal matrices $$$U$$$ and $$$V$$$ of the modified SNF. This permutation operation was merged into the zero-filling operator, $$$Z$$$, for speed. The modification of the SNF distributed the prime factors of $$$\det(P)$$$ across the diagonal elements of $$$D$$$ to produce a transform array size suitable for multithreaded FFT. CG reconstruction was stopped after 20 iterations. The 4-D pixels in the non-cuboid FOV were compared to corresponding pixels in an image reconstructed using the most densely packing cuboid FOV.
Results
Images reconstructed using cuboid and
non-cuboid FOVs were identical except for round-off differences after the
cuboid and non-cuboid FFTs. Non-cuboid images reconstructed in 82% of the time
required for cuboid images and required 89% of the memory for each FFT.Discussion
We have demonstrated the feasibility of
using non-cuboid FOVs combined with the MFFT to speed up iterative k-t SENSE
reconstruction for arbitrary k-space trajectories. While our current
reconstruction uses fast convolution with a pre-calculated PSF, non-cuboid FOVs
could be used for NUFFT-based reconstruction with pre-calculated convolution
gridding weights (7) for additional speed.
However, for NUFFT-based reconstruction, finding the optimal shape of the
convolution kernel is still an unsolved problem. In this study, we used cuboid
voxels to allow direct comparison to corresponding voxels in images with conventional
cuboid FOVs. Additional speedup could be achieved by tailoring the voxel shape
and in extension the k-space FOV to the k-space sampling domain. In this case,
voxels shaped as hexagonal prisms would be optimal for a stack-of-stars
sequence with its cylindrical sampling domain and could reduce reconstruction
time further by about 13% (2).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH/NCI PO1 CA059827.References
1. Tsao J, Boesiger P, Pruessmann KP. k-t
BLAST and k-t SENSE: dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal
correlations. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(5):1031–42.
2. Saranathan M, Ramanan V, Gulati R,
Venkatesan R. ANTHEM: anatomically tailored hexagonal MRI. Magn Reson Imaging.
2007;25(7):1039–47.
3. Guessoum A, Mersereau RM. Fast
algorithms for the multidimensional discrete Fourier transform. IEEE T Acoust
Speech. 1986;34(4):937–43.
4. Svenningsson L. Fourier transform of
BCC and FCC lattices for MRI applications. Uppsala University; 2015.
5. Feng L, Grimm R, Tobias Block K,
Chandarana H, Kim S, Xu J, Axel L, Sodickson DK, Otazo R. Golden-angle radial
sparse parallel MRI: Combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and
golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn
Reson Med. 2014;72(3):707–17.
6. Jackson JI, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG,
Macovski A. Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using
gridding. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991;10(3):473–8.
7. Fessler JA, Member S, Sutton BP.
Nonuniform Fast Fourier Transforms Using Min-Max Interpolation. 2003;51(2):560–74.
8. Beatty PJ, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM.
Rapid gridding reconstruction with a minimal oversampling ratio. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging. 2005;24(6):799–808.
9. Wajer F, Pruessmann K. Major Speedup
of Reconstruction for Sensitivity Encoding with arbitrary trajectories. In:
Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2001. p. 767.