Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established as a clinical routine in which multiple sets of data are typically acquired to produce various image contrasts such as T1, T2, FLAIR, etc. Despite the versatile nature of MRI, multi-contrast data acquisition is highly time consuming particularly when 3D encoding is needed. To address this issue, in this work we propose a novel, multi-contrast 3D MR image reconstruction with spatially adaptive priors by exploiting sharable information across the contrast dimension: edge and coil sensitivity maps. The proposed method consists of the following three steps: 1) estimation of edge maps common over all contrasts, 2) estimation of contrast-specific edge maps, and 3) multi-contrast image reconstruction with spatially adaptive, contrast-specific edge priors. In vivo experimental studies show that the proposed method enables T1, T2, and FLAIR 3D isotropic (1mm3) imaging roughly in 5-6 minutes.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is well established as a clinical routine in which multiple sets of data are typically acquired to produce various image contrasts such as T1, T2, FLAIR, etc. Despite the versatile nature of MRI, multi-contrast data acquisition is highly time consuming particularly when 3D encoding is needed[1]. To address this issue, in this work we propose a novel, multi-contrast 3D MR image reconstruction with spatially adaptive priors by exploiting sharable information across the contrast dimension: edge and coil sensitivity maps. The proposed method consists of the following three steps: 1) estimation of edge maps common over all contrasts, 2) estimation of contrast-specific edge maps, and 3) multi-contrast image reconstruction with spatially adaptive, contrast-specific edge priors. In vivo experimental studies show that the proposed method enables T1, T2, and FLAIR 3D isotropic (1mm3) imaging roughly in 5-6 minutes.Materials and Methods
Multi-Contrast 3D Data acquisition: Data (T1, T2, and FLAIR) were acquired in volunteers on a 3T whole-body MR scanner (uMR770, UIH, Shanghai). Imaging parameters common to all contrasts were: FOV = 240x240x176mm3, encoding matrix = 240x240x176, and the number of receiver channels = 17. Imaging parameters with T1-contrast were: TR/TE/TI= 7.2/3.1/750ms, bandwidth=250Hz/pix; those with T2-contrast were: TR/TE=2000/330ms, TEeff=142ms, bandwidth=600Hz/pix, ETL=160, ESP=4.18ms; and those with FLAIR were: TR/TE/TI =5000/461/1557ms, TEeff=154ms, bandwidth= 750Hz/pix, ETL =240, and ESP =3.72.
Multi-Contrast 3D Image Reconstruction:
1) Estimation of edge and coil sensitivity maps common to all contrasts: MR signals in each contrast with incomplete measurements are denoted by:
$$d_i=Ef_i$$
where $$$i$$$ is the index of each contrast ($$$i$$$ = 1,2,3 for T1, T2, FLAIR, respectively), $$$d_i$$$ is the measured data in k-space, $$$f_i$$$ is the desired multi-contrast image, $$$E=CF_u$$$ is the encoding operator, $$$C$$$ is the coil sensitivity maps and $$$F_u$$$ is the undersampling Fourier operator. The common edge map ($$$W$$$) is constructed by combining the bases of null space for the structured matrix $$$\Gamma (\hat{d})$$$ in which a sliding patch of low frequency Fourier samples is row-vectorized. This approach comes from the fact that the Fourier coefficients of the partial derivatives of an image satisfy a linear, annihilating filter relation [2] by:
$$\Gamma (\hat{d})W=0$$
where $$$\hat{d}$$$ is the Fourier samples in the central region of k-space across all contrasts, $$$W=[W_v,\, W_h]$$$ and consists of vertical and horizontal edge maps common to all contrasts. Coil sensitivity maps, which are supposedly invariant, are generated from the fully sampled low-frequency k-space averaged over all contrasts.
2) Estimation of contrast-specific edge maps: The contrast-specific edge map ($$$u_i$$$) is estimated by solving the following optimization problem with the common edge priors:
$$\arg \underset{u_{v,i}}{min} \left \| \partial_{x}f_{i}-u_{v,i} \right\|_{2}^{2}+\lambda_v \left \| J(W_v)(u_{v,i}-W_v))) \right \|_{2}^{2} $$
$$\arg \underset{u_{h,i}}{min} \left \| \partial_{y}f_{i}-u_{h,i} \right\|_{2}^{2}+\lambda_h \left \| J(W_h)(u_{h,i}-W_h))) \right \|_{2}^{2} $$
where $$$\partial_{x}f_{i}$$$ and $$$\partial_{y}f_{i}$$$ represent vertical and horizontal image gradients and $$$J(W)$$$ contains the weight coefficients.
3) Image reconstruction using spatially adaptive, contrast-specific edge priors: multi-contrast images are reconstructed from incomplete measurements by solving the following optimization problem with the contrast-specific priors:
$$\arg \underset{f_{i}}{min} \left \| d_{i}-Ef_{i} \right\|_{2}^{2}+\lambda_1 \left \|u_{v,i}^{*}\partial_{x}f_{i} \right \|_{1}+\lambda_2 \left \|u_{h,i}^{*}\partial_{y}f_{i} \right \|_{1}$$
where $$$\lambda$$$ is the regularization parameter, ||∙||2 is the Euclidian norm, and ||∙||1 is the 1-norm. The entire diagram of the proposed reconstruction method is illustrated in Figure 1.
Results
Figure 2 represents T1-, T2- and FLAIR T2-weighted images reconstructed using conventional SPARSE SENSE (b) [3], FCSA_MT (c) [4], and the proposed method (d) for comparison with a reduction factor (R) of 6. The image from the full-sampled data (a) is represented for reference. A difference image between the reference and the estimate in each contrast is presented. Even with R = 6, the proposed method exhibits relatively lower level of artifacts and noise. Fig. 3 represents T1, T2, and FLAIR 3D images (reformatted into the axial, coronal, and sagittal orientations) reconstructed using the proposed method with R = 6. It is noted that the proposed method preserves edges well without apparent artifacts and amplified noise.Discussion and Conclusion
We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed, multi-contrast 3D MRI reconstruction with spatially adaptive, contrast-specific edge priors from incomplete measurements (R = 6). It is expected that the proposed method enables T1, T2, and FLAIR 3D isotropic (1mm3) imaging roughly in 5-6 minutes and potentially replaces conventional multi-contrast imaging scenarios.[1] Bilgic, et al Multi-contrast Reconstruction with Bayesian Compressed Sensing. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2011; 66:1601–1615.
[2] Greg, et al. Off-the-grid recovery of piecewise constant images from few Fourier samples. CoRR. 2015; abs/1510.00384
[3] Otazo, et al. Combination of Compressed Sensing and Parallel Imaging for Highly Accelerated First-Pass Cardiac Perfusion MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010; 64:767–776.
[4] Junzhou Huang, et al. Fast multi-contrast MRI reconstruction. MRI. 2014; 32:1344–1352