Liad Pollak Zuckerman1, Lior Weizman2, Yonina C. Eldar2, Dafna Ben Bashat3, Moran Arzi3, and Michal Irani1
1Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, 3Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Synopsis
Dynamic
contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is useful for tumor diagnosis and treatment. In DCE, there is a tradeoff between the spatial and
temporal resolutions. Improving the spatial resolution while preserving the
temporal dynamics is essential for better diagnosis/treatment. We present a method (LAPFUD) for enhancing
the spatial frequency without compromising on temporal
resolution. LAPFUD combines information from a static high-resolution image
acquired at baseline, with each low-resolution frame. By making local decisions
it preserves details from both inputs without changing the temporal behavior. Experiments
show that LAPFUD provides superior performance (spatially and temporally)
compared to the commonly used keyhole method.
Introduction:
Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance
imaging has been widely used to characterize the microvasculature of brain
lesion and tumors1,2. High temporal resolution (<
2 sec)3 is only required in the first minute post contrast agent injection,
for accurate detection of bolus arrival time, while high spatial resolution is
necessary for diagnosis. There is an inherent tradeoff between temporal and spatial
resolutions, dictated by the physics of the sequence used, affecting also brain
coverage. Several methods have been proposed to enhance the spatial resolution
of the dynamic images based on high-resolution (HR)
images acquired in the first minute post injection4, or to enhance
the temporal resolution based on partial acquisition of the data5. The
keyhole method6, which is implemented in many clinical DCE
sequences, is based on the acquisition of static HR images before the dynamic
sequence. It combines, in the k-space domain, high-frequency data taken from the HR
images, with low frequency data acquired during the dynamic acquisition. The
aim of this study is to propose a new method, to improve the spatial resolution
of dynamic images based on an HR image acquired at baseline. The proposed
method coined LAplacian Pyramid based FUsion for improved DCE (LAPFUD) fuses
between the HR image and the low-resolution (LR) dynamic sequence using Laplacian
pyramids7. Compared to the keyhole approach that acts globally on
the entire image, LAPFUD makes local decisions on selecting the strongest local
edges from either the LR or HR images. Therefore, it captures details from both
inputs (the HR image and LR sequence) and results in many spatial details that
do not exist in the keyhole method, without compromising on the temporal
resolution of the original LR sequence.Methods:
A static HR MR image was acquired prior to dynamic
acquisition. Both the HR image and the LR sequence consisted of 20 axial
slices, with matrix size of 512x368 for the HR image and 256x184 for the LR DCE
sequence, which contained a total of 78 LR frames acquired with
temporal resolution of 6 seconds. Each slice in the LR frame is interpolated
(bicubic interpolation) by 2 to match the HR image size. Then, realignment and
reslicing was performed using the SPM tool8. For both HR and LR
frames a Laplacian pyramid9 was calculated with depth 4. Each pyramid
level captures information about a different spatial frequency range, except
the lowest level which is a small down-scaled version of the original. We then form a new Laplacian
pyramid by choosing, at each pixel, the coefficient from the transformed HR and
LR images with the highest absolute value7. Effectively, LAPFUD
corresponds to selecting the strongest local edges at each frequency range. The
final fused image is obtained by an inverse transform on the result. The LAPFUD
algorithm is illustrated in Figure 1. For comparison
purposes, the keyhole
method is also applied on the same HR and LR images. Results and Discussion:
Figure 2 shows data obtained from patient with high grade
brain tumor: The input data (slice 11 taken from both the HR and LR images) and
the results of both keyhole and our proposed LAPFUD. The contrast agent
enhancement is clearly visible in the LR image (frame #13 during
contrast agent injection). By applying LAPFUD, more detailed information
from the HR image is preserved. To ensure
that the temporal dynamics has not been affected by LAPFUD, we examined two pixels'
intensity profiles over time, taken from homogenous healthy and tumor regions. The
time courses of the original LR sequence, the keyhole result and LAPFUD for a healthy and tumor pixel
are shown in Figure 3. Both keyhole and LAPFUD exhibit no major changes compared to the original
LR sequence (both provide temporal correlation with the original LR time course
of above 0.99) for the 2 pixels examined. In other words, LAPFUD exhibits improved spatial
resolution (compared to keyhole) while preserving the temporal one. Conclusion:
We presented a method to enhance the spatial resolution in DCE MRI by using a HR static image.
The Laplacian pyramid based fusion allows making local decisions and combining
detailed information from both images. We illustrated that this method improves
spatial resolution while preserving temporal dynamics, leading to improved
temporal/spatial resolution tradeoff. As a result, it can be used in cases
where both high temporal and spatial resolutions of the dynamic sequence are
required, for better diagnosis and treatment
decisions making. Future work will examine LAPFUD performance in improving
spatial resolution for DCE acquired at higher frame rates.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1P.Tofts ed. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by
disease. John Wiley & Sons, 2005;
2Khalifa F, Soliman A, El-Baz A, Abou El-Ghar M, El-Diasty T, Gimel'farb
G, Ouseph R, Dwyer AC. Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: A review.
Medical physics. 2014 Dec 1;41(12).
3Nadav, G., Liberman, G., Artzi, M., Kiryati, N. and Bashat D.B., 2017.
Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic
contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time. Journal of Magnetic
Resonance Imaging, 45(1), pp.237-249.
4I.O Jelescu et al. Dual-temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced
MRI protocol for blood-brain barrier permeability measurement in enhancing
multiple sclerosis lesions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging May 2011.
5Otazp R, Candes E, Sodickson DK. Low-rank plus sparse matrix
decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and
dynamic components. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2015 Mar 1;73(3):1125-36
6Vanvalls JJ, et al. JMRI 1993 3(4):671-675.
7P. J. Burt, et al, Enhanced image capture through fusion in Proc. 4th
Int. Conf. Computer Vision, Berlin, Germany, May 1993, pp 173-182.
8K. Friston et al. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM), 1999.
9P. J. Burt, et al, The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code. IEEE
transactions on communications, vol. com-31 no. 4, April 1983.