Synopsis
The
aim of this study was to determine the most accurate weighting factor for
precise quantification of fatty liver when the 6-point interference Dixon fat
percentage imaging technique is used by analyzing changes in WFs of fatty acid
metabolites in liver. The importance of accurate WFs in the calculation of
6-pt-DIXON-based FP was confirmed in the phantom experiment. This study
proposes average WF values that can be effectively used to acquire accurate
6-pt-DIXON FP images for non-alcoholic fatty liver. In addition, if the
WFs of liver parenchyma FMs are applied, the accuracy of 6-pt-DIXON FP imaging
can further increase.
Introduction
The aim of
this study was to determine the most accurate weighting factor (WF) for precise
quantification of fatty liver when the 6-point interference Dixon fat
percentage imaging technique (6-pt-DIXON) is used by analyzing changes in WFs
of fatty acid metabolites(FM) in liver.Methods
Phantom
experiment and MRI/1H-MRS acquisition
A lipid
phantom experiment comprised of four test tubes, which contained oleic,
linoleic acid, and soybean oil was manufactured in preparation for the repeatability
test, which was aimed at studying the repeatability of 6-pt-DIXON measurements
of FP in response to WF changes (figure 1). We used a point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence
for localized 1H-MRS with TR = 1.5 s s, TE = 35 ms, and NEX = 64. A
10×10×10 mm3 voxel was placed within a homogeneous area to avoid
air.
WF calculation from phantom
series MRS data
The integrated areas under peaks were measured
.We calculated the WF of each of the 7 peak FMs with the following equation: Individual FM weighting factor=(appropriate
lipid proton concentration )/(7 peak lipid ptrons intergrated areas )
WFs for
individual FMs were calculated for oleic acid (WF1), linoleic acid (WF2),
soybean oil (WF3), and soybean oil2 (WF4) based on the concentration ratios of
the 7 peak lipid protons using integrated areas. Also, the average WF
(WFave3,4) of WF3 and WF4 was calculated for use in the FP experiments during
the 6-pt-DIXON examination.
Various WF applied 6-Echo
Interference Dixon MR Imaging (6-pt-DIXON) Fat Percentage image acquisition and
analysis
The 3T MR was used to evaluate the differences in FP
value of 6-pt-DIXON pulse sequences difference. The reference weighting factor (WFref) was calculated using the
7T MRS data of calf subcutaneous tissues in reference to the study by Ren et.
al [1]. The values of WF1, WF2,
and WFave3,4 obtained from the MRS phantom experiment were applied
to the 6-pt-DIXON method to acquire FPs.
High fat diet fatty liver rat
model MRS experimental protocol and analysis
Ten male
8-week-old Sprague­Dawley rats were fed a 60% high fat diet until the end of
the experiment. The baseline MRS/I were acquired before rats were fed the HF
diet, and MRS/I data was then acquired every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. We use a
point-resolved spectroscopy sequence for localized 1H-MRS with TR =
1,500 msec, TE = 35 msec, NEX = 64 and Voxel = 8×8×8 mm3. The
concentrations associated with fat deposition were calculated as the
water-to-total 7 lipid peak integrated concentration ratios using water scaling
and were grouped into 4 groups: 0-10%, 11-20%, 21-30%, and > 31%.Results and Discussion
The lipid proton profiles obtained from the test
tube MRS data are different from each other, as shown in Fig. 2. Individual
lipid proton weighting factors indicate the weighting factors of oleic acid
(WF1), linoleic acid (WF2), soybean oil (WF3), and soybean oil2 (WF4), which
were calculated based on the concentration ratios of the 7 peak lipid protons
using integrated areas. The WF of the soybean oil (test tubes 3 and 4) was
determined as the average of the values of the two test tubes, weighted with
coefficients (WFave3,4). Fig. 3 shows the results of the statistical analysis
comparing mean differences based on the 6-pt-DIXON images obtained 10 times
each, after the 4 WFs were applied. When those WFs were applied, the mean FP
was unchanged in test tube 1 (oleic acid) (p = 0.146), whereas the mean FPs of
the remaining 3 test tubes were significantly changed.
The liver fat percentage (%) in by MRS data was
calculated using the equation: sum of 7 peak lipid proton concentrations/(water
concentration + sum of 7 peak lipid proton concentrations). The WFs for FM in
these four groups were not statistically significant. However, the p-values of
WFs at 0.9 and 1.6 ppm were substantial, 0.078 and 0.045, respectively, albeit
not statistically significant. By fat composition, methylene metabolite was the
leading composition, accounting for 63-71% of the total FM concentration in
high fat diet-induced fatty liver tissue, followed by methylene, methylene
protons β to COO, and diallylic metabolite with similar concentration levels.
The methane and diallylic metabolite made up about 4.5~4.8% of total FM
concentration and allylic metabolite made up about 3.8%, representing the
lowest concentration in hepatic lipid composition
Conclusion
This
study proposes average WF values that can be effectively used to acquire
accurate 6-pt-DIXON FP images for non-alcoholic fatty liver. In addition, if
the WFs of liver parenchyma FMs, which are specific to each liver disease, are
applied, the accuracy of 6-pt-DIXON FP imaging can further increase.
Acknowledgements
This research was
supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research
Foundation of Korea(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future
Planning(2015R1C1A1A02036988).References
1. Ren J, Dimitrov I, Sherry AD, Malloy CR.
Composition of adipose tissue and marrow fat in humans by 1H NMR at 7 Tesla. J
Lipid Res. 2008:49(9):2055-2062.