There are many types of hypervascular tumors that need to be differentiated from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) including focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Since each tumor requires different treatment strategies, awareness and recognition of reliable imaging features that help precisely distinguish among these hypervascular tumors. Since these hypervascular tumors occasionally manifest overlapping imaging features, the accurate diagnosis of these tumors can still be challenging on MRI. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine ancillary imaging features that help differentiation of hypervascular hepatic tumors on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Hypervascular hepatic tumors are commonly identified in MR imaging. Since these tumors occasionally manifest overlapping imaging features, the accurate diagnosis can be challenging on conventional MRI. Our study demonstrated that hyperintensity on ADC map in HCAs, central hypointensity on AP in NETs, target sign on HBPI in ICCs, and presence of capsule and intratumoral septum in HCCs were independent and significant ancillary features for differentiation of these hypervascular tumors on gadoxtic acid-enhanced MRI.
In our study, considerable number (82.6%, 19/23) of atypical FNHs revealed reverse target appearance on HBP compared with only one case of ICC in other hypervascular tumors. The reason of these atypical findings on HBP in FNH is presumably associated with presence of central scar and absence of OATP8 expression in the hepatocytes surrounding the central scar in hypointense area, and strong expression of OATP8 in peripheral areas. Although this imaging feature were not demonstrated as significant variable, we believe it may be beneficial to differentiate atypical FNH from other hypervascular tumors.
1. Choi JY, Lee JM, Sirlin CB (2014) CT and MR imaging diagnosisand staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development,growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects.Radiology 272:635–654
2. Park HJ, Kim YK, Park MJ, Lee WJ (2013) Small intrahepaticmass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: target sign on diffusionweightedimaging for differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma.Abdom Imaging 38:793–801
3. Park HJ, Jang KM, Kang TW et al (2016) Identification of imagingpredictors discriminating different primary liver tumours in patientswith chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: a classificationtree analysis. Eur Radiol 26:3102–3111
4. L. Grazioli, M. P. Bondioni, H. Haradome et al. (2012) Hepatocellularadenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: value of gadoxeticacid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Radiology 262:520–529
5. Jlian Arista-Nasr, Jose Antonio Fernandez-Amador (2010) Neuroendocrine metastatic tumors of the liver resembling hepatocellular carcinomas. Annals of hepatology 9:186-1916. Van der Hoef M, Crook DW, Marincek B et al. (2004) Primaryneuroendocrine carcinomas of the liver: MRI features in two cases. Abdom Imaging 4:77–81
Ancillary imaging features of hypervascular hepatic tumors
Reverse target sign as central hypointensity with peripheral hyperintense rim on hepatobiliary phase image (HBPI) in focal nodular hyperplasia, hyperintensity on DWI and ADC map in hepatocellular adenoma, arterial central hypointensity in neuroendocrine tumor, target sign as central hyperintensity with peripheral hypointense rim on HBPI in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and presence of capsule and intratumoral septum in hepatocellular carcinoma are helpful imaging features to differentiate these hypervascular tumor groups.