Kyu-Ho Song1, Min-Young Lee1, Chi-Hyeon Yoo1, Song-I Lim1, and Bo-Young Choe1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Synopsis
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) with optimized
relaxation time provides an effective means for quantifying lipid content and characterizing
hepatic steatosis. The aim of this study was to quantify the difference in
hepatic lipid content with metabolic changes and determine effect of diet on high-fat
diet (HFD)-fed mice by measuring the main localized MRS sequence with
relaxation times.
Purpose
The pathogenesis of storage disease or metabolic disorders
depends on their specific effect on metabolism. Complex interactions occur between
the metabolic pathways of fatty acids, glucose, and lipoproteins.1,2 Changes in the
expression of metabolites, in addition to changes in saturated and unsaturated
fatty acid contents following formation of abnormal metabolites, play an
important pathogenic role and can be measured by proton MRS.3,4 The aims of
this study were to: (1) validate a noninvasive MRS-based procedure for
quantifying differences in hepatic lipid content of the liver with respect to
metabolic changes; (2) determine the possible effect of a HFD on the hepatic
lipid content in mice with serum biochemistry; and (3) demonstrate that incorrect
and correct relaxation times yield contradictory quantification results for
liver fat tissue.Materials and Methods
Hepatic steatosis (ten male C57BL/6N mice) was induced
in the mice via HFD pellets composed of 60% fat, 20% protein, and 20%
carbohydrates. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRS analyses were performed
using a horizontal 9.4 T MRI animal scanner (Biospec 94/20 USR, Bruker Biospin
GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a 20-cm bore magnet with a 400 mT/m
gradient and a four-channel receive-only array animal coil. The MRS scan
parameters were as follows: standard stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) sequence
(repetition time [TR], 5,000 ms; mixing time [TM], 10 ms; echo time [TE], 20
ms; number of signal average, 128; acquisition data point, 2,048; acquisition
bandwidth, 4,401.41 Hz; repetition time, 1; scan time, ~11 min) and multi-TEs
STEAM sequence (with TE, 20–70 ms). For animal proton MRS, a voxel size of 3×3×3 mm3 (2.7 mL) was selected. Before the MRS scan, the water
resonance signal in the volume of interest of the livers of HFD-fed mice was
suppressed by variable pulse power and optimized relaxation delays.5 All the MRS data
were quantified using the Linear Combination of Model Spectra (Version 6.3.1).6 The following correct
curve-fitting equation (M(TE)=M0e(-TE/T2)[cos(πJETE)+b]) was used to measure the relaxation times of lipid resonance,
where JE and b are the values of the J-coupling evolution and
complement number to M0 in cases with nonzero JE values,
respectively.7Results
To measure the lipid metabolite peaks, we analyzed the
time points shown in Fig 1. The signal-to-noise ratios for methylene protons
of the liver were as follows: 0 week, 33.2 ± 10.1; 2 weeks, 58.2 ± 8.2; 4
weeks, 70.9 ± 6.4; 7 weeks, 106.0 ± 9.2; 10 weeks, and 114.2 ± 10.9. As shown
in Fig 2 and 3, the differences in relaxation times with incorrection and correction
values were as follows: ~0.90 ppm (week 0: p < 0.001; week 10: p < 0.001),
~1.60 ppm (week 0: p < 0.001), ~2.03 ppm (week 0: p < 0.05), ~2.78 ppm
(week 0: p < 0.001; week 10: p < 0.05), and ~5.30 ppm (week 0: p < 0.05).
Figure 4 shows the total saturated fatty acid levels calculated at 2 (p <
0.05), 4 (p < 0.01), and 10 (p < 0.01). The change in the total
unsaturated fatty acid was statistically significant at week 2 (p < 0.05) (week
2-10, p < 0.01) and the change in the total unsaturated bonds was
statistically significant from week 4 to 10 (p < 0.05). In addition, the
change in the polyunsaturated bonds was statistically significant at week 4 (p
< 0.05). As shown in Fig. 5, liver weights in HFD-fed mice (1.69 ± 0.14 g)
were significantly higher than those in normal-chow diet-fed mice (1.43 ± 0.10
g) as controls. Serum glucose (p < 0.05), aspartate transaminase (p <
0.001), and alanine transaminase (p < 0.001) concentrations were
significantly elevated in HFD mice. Serum albumin (p < 0.05) and total
bilirubin (p < 0.05) concentrations were also significantly lower in HFD
mice.Discussion and Conclusion
Our results indicate that methyl and methylene protons
are sensitive to HFD-induced lipid accumulation in the fatty liver and reveal
that the relaxation times of resonances yield significantly different
quantification of lipid contents in animals. In conclusion, we suggest that
for the research and clinical evaluation of disease, obtaining a STEAM sequence
with T2 correction using an ultra-high field scanner is an appropriate
method for lipid content quantification. The resonances are dependent on the relaxation
correction for metabolite quantification. We analyzed the lipid content
(upregulated saturated and unsaturated fatty acids; downregulated
polyunsaturated fatty acids) in the liver of HFD-fed mice and evaluated the
lipid quantification with a sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants (2012-007883) from
the Mid-career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation
(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) of
Korea.References
1. Cheung JS, Fan SJ, Gao DS, et al. In vivo lipid
profiling using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in an experimental liver
fibrosis model. Acad. Radiol. 2011;18(3):377-383.
2. Cobbold JF, Patel JH, Goldin RD, et al. Hepatic lipid
profiling in chronic hepatitis C: an in vitro and in vivo proton magnetic
resonance spectroscopy study. J. Hepatol. 2010;52(1):16-24.
3. Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the
natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to
hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology.
2002;123(1):134-140.
4. Chabanova E, Bille DS, Thisted E, et al. 1H MRS assessment
of hepatic steatosis in overweight children and adolescents: comparison between
3T and open 1T MR-systems. Abdom. Imaging. 2013;38(2):315-319.
5. Tkáč I, Starčuk Z, Choi IY, et al. In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of rat
brain at 1 ms echo time. Magn. Reson. Med 1999;41(EPFL-ARTICLE-177519):649-656.
6. Provencher SW. Automatic quantitation of localized in
vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR Biomed 2001;14(4):260-264.
7. Yahya A, Tessier AG, Fallone BG. Effect of J‐coupling on lipid
composition determination with localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy
at 9.4 T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2011;34(6):1388-1396.