Rutger C.H. Stijns1, Bart W.J. Philips1, Chella van der Post2, Iris D. Nagtegaal2, Carla Wauters3, Luc J.A. Strobbe4, Fatih Polat4, Johannes H.W. de Wilt5, Stefan H.G. Rietsch6,7, Sascha Brunheim6,7, Stephan Orzada6, Harald H. Quick6,7, Jurgen F. Fütterer1, and Tom W.J. Scheenen1,6
1Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Pathology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Pathology, Cansius Wilhelmina hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Surgery, Cansius Wilhelmina hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MR Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, 7High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Synopsis
For patients with rectal cancer, the
presence of lymph node metastases is an important risk factor for determining
prognosis and stratifying for treatment. Clinically, lymph node staging is very
challenging, especially when lymph nodes are small (<5mm). By using
ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles combined with (ultra)
high magnetic field imaging (combidex-enhanced MRI), the detection rate of
these metastatic lymph nodes may improve significantly. In this abstract we
present the workflow for validating combidex-enhanced MRI by performing a node
to node comparison of in vivo combidex-enhanced MRI findings
with histopathological examination.
Synopsis
For patients with rectal cancer, the
presence of lymph node metastases is an important risk factor for determining
prognosis and stratifying for treatment. Clinically, lymph node staging is very
challenging, especially when lymph nodes are small (<5mm). By using
ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles combined with (ultra)
high magnetic field imaging (combidex-enhanced MRI), the detection rate of
these metastatic lymph nodes may improve significantly. In this abstract we
present the workflow for validating combidex-enhanced MRI by performing a node
to node comparison of in vivo combidex-enhanced MRI findings
with histopathological examination. Introduction
The presence of lymph node
metastases in rectal cancer is a key factor in determining an adequate
treatment. Concluding on the lymph node status, however, is a major challenge.1 Ferumoxtran-10, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic
iron oxide (USPIO) particle, has proven to be a valuable contrast agent for
detecting lymph node metastases using MRI, also called combidex-enhanced MRI.2 Previous work showed that the
diagnostic accuracy for the detection of small lymph node metastases (<5mm) dropped
substantially.3 By using a 3 and 7 Tesla MRI scanner,
it is possible to increase the spatial resolution of combidex-enhanced MRI, thereby
increasing the sensitivity for the detection of small positive nodes.4 Histopathological validation of these
nodes demands for a dedicated workflow from initial detection during in vivo
MRI up to final histopathological examination. Here, we present the workflow
and initial results in validating combidex-enhanced MRI for detecting small lymph
node metastases in rectal cancer.Methods
In this observational study, patients
with biopsy proven rectal cancer are included 1-2 weeks prior to surgical
treatment. Patients are administered with 2.6 mg/kg body weight of
ferumoxtran-10 mixed with 0.9% saline solution. 24-36 hours later an MRI examination
is performed at 3T and at 7T (Magnetom Prisma and 7T, Siemens Healthineers,
Erlangen, Germany). The MR protocol and parameters are displayed in Table 1.5
The detection of the lymph nodes is done on lipid-selective T1-weighted gradient
echo MR images and the suspicion on metastatic manifestation is determined on
T2*-weighted images6.
Surgical treatment consists of a
total mesorectal excision, in which the rectum including surrounding fatty
tissue with lymph nodes is removed. After fixation in formalin, the surgical
specimen is examined on a 7 Tesla preclinical MR system (ClinScan, Bruker® BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany). These ex vivo MR images are used to annotate lymph nodes for an
MR-guided pathological examination. The annotations enable a node-to-node
comparison between in vivo MRI and pathology. The histopathological analysis is
then used to validate the results of the 3T and 7T MRI scans. A complete
overview of the workflow is given in Figure 1.Results
Three patients have been included in
this ongoing study. Two patients underwent 3T MRI and 7T MRI and one patient
underwent 3T MRI only. Two patients were scheduled for direct surgical
treatment and one patient had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In these
three patients 9 lymph nodes were considered malignant with a mean diameter of
4.1 mm (range 2 - 5 mm, example shown in Figure 2). The 7T ex vivo MRI scans
revealed 146 lymph nodes with a mean diameter of 2.7 mm (range 0.8 – 5.2 mm). Histopathological
examination harvested 48 lymph nodes from the surgical specimens, including the
9 lymph nodes suspicious for metastases based on combidex-enhanced MRI. 8 out
of 9 suspicious nodes could be matched to histology as visualized in Figure 3.Discussion
The preliminary data of the ongoing
study shows that it is feasible to visualize potentially malignant lymph nodes
in rectal cancer patients by using combidex-enhanced MRI. Both 3T and 7T MRI showed
that the contrast agent can migrate to lymph nodes after an intravenous
infusion. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may impede the transport of the
nano-particles towards the locoregional lymph nodes, which has to be explored
in future patients. By using our current workflow, we are able to identify the
potentially metastatic lymph nodes at initial in vivo MRI and keep track of them
all the way to the histological slide at pathology. The additional step of the
7T ex vivo MRI scan allows the node-to-node correlation between the in vivo MRI
images and histology. This extra step in the workflow is of great value in
determining the accuracy of combidex-enhanced MRI on a lymph node basis. The lymph
nodes with a high suspicion of malignancy can be identified ex vivo and pointed
out during work-up for histological examination, thereby enabling the
pathologist to make a final statement on the lymphatic spread of the cancer and
on the predictive value of combidex-enhanced MRI for rectal cancer staging.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas
M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer:
Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and
Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. European radiology 2017.
2. Fortuin AS, Bruggemann R, van der Linden J, et al. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxides for metastatic lymph node
detection: back on the block. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews Nanomedicine and
nanobiotechnology 2017.
3. Harisinghani
MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF, et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult
lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. The New England journal of medicine
2003;348:2491-9.
4. Heesakkers
RA, Futterer JJ, Hovels AM, et al. Prostate cancer evaluated with
ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: early
experience. Radiology 2006;239:481-7.
5. Orzada
S, Maderwald S, Poser BA, Bitz AK, Quick HH, Ladd ME. RF excitation using time
interleaved acquisition of modes (TIAMO) to address B1 inhomogeneity in
high-field MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2010;64:327-33.
6. Philips BWJ, Fortuin AS, Orzada S,
Scheenen TWJ, Maas MC. High resolution MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes at 7
Tesla. Magnetic resonance in medicine 2017;78:1020-8.