Synopsis
Separately, acute stress and cigarette cues are
associated with cigarette smoking relapse, and each has been shown to increase
nicotine seeking/self-administration. However, their potentially additive
effects are understudied in humans. Using functional neuroimaging and a
placebo-controlled double-blind design, we found acute stress suppressed
cue-evoked activation in the medial orbitofrontal, parietal, and prefrontal
cortices. Further, the effects of stress on nicotine withdrawal severity were
inversely related to medial orbitofrontal and nucleus accumbens activation. Our
findings illustrate acute stress exerts cooperative modulation of
neural signals and subjective withdrawal severity, known to be important for
long-term abstinence.
Background
Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in
the United States4. The majority of cigarette
smokers relapse within the first year of treatment5-9. Acute stress and smoking cues are
often precipitating factors of smoking relapse10-15. Indeed, experimental studies reliably
demonstrate both acute stress16-18 and smoking cues17,19,20, separately, increase nicotine seeking/self-administration,
a direct measure of nicotine motivation. However, few human studies have
examined their potentially additive effects21,22. The goal of this study was to isolate
the effects of acute stress on cigarette cue-evoked neural activation during a
simple attention-control task. Methods
Non-treatment-seeking cigarette smokers (expired carbon
monoxide ≥5ppm, ≥10 cigarettes/day, and Fagerstrom23 score ≥4) without psychiatric
comorbidities or cardiovascular/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]
contraindications were eligible. Subjects (N=21) completed two placebo-controlled,
double-blind, random cross-over oral-dosing sessions: acute stress (yohimbine 54mg + hydrocortisone
10mg; YOH+HYD) and placebo (0mg, 0mg). Each subject served as his/her own
control.
Experimental sessions occurred on non-consecutive
weekdays between 11am-4pm (Figure 1). Subjects only smoked at designated times
during each session (ad libitum before/after sessions). From 1-2pm, participants
completed an MRI scan with T1-weighted (MPRAGE) and gradient echo
planar imaging (TE=36ms, TR=2.83s, matrix=80x80, 40 interleaved slices, voxel=2.9mm
isotropic). Two tasks were administered: N-back and cerebrovascular reactivity (Figure
2).
Raw fMRI data were slice-time corrected, motion-corrected,
high-pass filtered (128Hz), coregistered to MNI space, smoothed (6mm Gaussian
kernel), and resliced (1.5mm isotropic) in SPM8. Within each subject and session,
first-level contrast maps (smoking>neutral images for 0- and 1-back,
separately) were submitted to group-level, random-effects analyses (cluster-level
corrected; AFNI 3dClustSim; p<.05).
Mean cluster extents were extracted from first-level contrast maps
(smoking>neutral images; 0- and 1-back) for regions of interest (ROIs): medial
orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC), insula, and nucleus accumbens (NAcc). Cerebrovascular
reactivity (CVR) maps (breath-hold>paced breathing) were contrasted by
session (stress>placebo) using a liberal threshold (voxel-level; p<.05) and subtracted from N-back
maps to remove potential vascular (non-neural) confounds. Finally, the choice
progressive ratio task consisted of 11 independent choice trials during which subjects
could earn (via computer ‘mouse’ clicks) either: one cigarette puff or money
($0.25). After the task, subjects smoked the exact number of puffs earned
(preferred cigarette brand; live video-verified). Results
Relative to placebo, YOH+HYD significantly increased heart
rate, blood pressure, and saliva cortisol (Figure 3). N-back response accuracy was
generally high (85%-100%) and did not differ by session (p=.22) or image type (p=.40).
After scanning, self-reported appetitive craving, relief-motivated craving, and
withdrawal severity was moderate, and did not differ between sessions (p’s=.54, .71, and .84, respectively). Relative to placebo, acute stress
significantly increased nicotine seeking/self-administration (p<.05; partial η2=0.24;
moderate-to-large effect), controlling for nicotine dependence level
(Fagerstrom score). Acute stress suppressed activation: especially in the mOFC,
parietal, and prefrontal cortices (Figure 4). Acute stress effects were
isolated by calculating difference scores (stress minus placebo) for ROI cluster extents and subjective effects. Exploratory
Pearson correlations indicated mOFC and NAcc activation were both inversely correlated
with withdrawal severity (Pearson=-.58 and -.50; Figure 5). Controlling for nicotine
dependence level and past-week smoking frequency, linear regressions confirmed activation
relationships with withdrawal and relief-motivated craving, but not appetitive
craving (R2=.49 and .47, respectively).
No significant relationships were observed for craving.Discussion
Our findings support the predictive validity of this pharmacological
stress-induction approach: YOH+HYD induced a physiological stress response and
increased nicotine seeking/self-administration, relative to placebo. Acute
stress suppressed activation throughout the cortex, but did not modulate
overall nicotine withdrawal severity or cigarette craving levels. However, bivariate
correlations, and follow-up linear regressions, indicated the effect of stress
on mOFC and NAcc activation was inversely related to withdrawal severity. These
findings illustrate the heterogeneous effect of acute stress on important
subjective constructs (craving and withdrawal), but the cooperative effects on
neural signals in brains regions associated with cue processing (mOFC) and
appetitive craving (NAcc)24,25. We speculate that subjects
who experienced greater withdrawal severity may have actively suppressed cigarette
cue salience/appraisal (mOFC activation) in order to minimize appetitive
craving (NAcc activation) which could not be sated during MRI scanning. Importantly,
these relationships remained significant after controlling for potential
confounds (nicotine dependence level and recent smoking frequency). It must be
noted that YOH+HYD is vasoconstrictive (Figure 3), yet CVR difference maps
(Figure 4) indicate greater
activation during stress (>placebo; especially in the cortex). Thus, we
believe stress-induced activation suppression was not an artifact of vasoconstrictive
effects. This study examined two factors (stress, cues) known to precipitate
smoking relapse, and found the effects of acute stress on craving/withdrawal
were specific to the individual, but exhibited strong relationships with neural
signals. Acknowledgements
The authors thank Caroline
Zajac-Benitez, Muzamil Arshad, Chaitali Anand, Jonathan Lynn, Andrew Neff, Lisa
Sulkowski, and Paul Burghardt for their assistance. References
1 Cox,
L. S., Tiffany, S. T. & Christen, A. G. Evaluation of the brief
questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 3, 7-16 (2001).
2 Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A.,
Fiez, J. A. & Brough, E. Carry-over effects of smoking cue exposure on
working memory performance. Nicotine
& tobacco research 9,
613-619 (2007).
3 Hughes, J. R. & Hatsukami, D.
Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Archives
of general psychiatry 43,
289-294 (1986).
4 Health, U. D. o. & Services,
H. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health 17 (2014).
5 Eisenberg, M. J. et al. Pharmacotherapies for smoking
cessation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal 179, 135-144 (2008).
6 Mills, E. J. et al. Comparisons of high-dose and combination nicotine
replacement therapy, varenicline, and bupropion for smoking cessation: a
systematic review and multiple treatment meta-analysis. Annals of medicine 44,
588-597, doi:10.3109/07853890.2012.705016 (2012).
7 Ucar, E. Y. et al. Effectiveness of pharmacologic therapies on smoking
cessation success: three years results of a smoking cessation clinic. interventions 4, 5 (2014).
8 Nides, M. et al. Varenicline versus bupropion SR or placebo for smoking
cessation: a pooled analysis. American journal
of health behavior 32, 664-675
(2008).
9 Silagy, C., Lancaster, T., Stead,
L., Mant, D. & Fowler, G. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking
cessation (Review). (2005).
10 Heishman, S. J. Behavioral and
cognitive effects of smoking: relationship to nicotine addiction. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 1, S143-S147 (1999).
11 Matheny, K. B. & Weatherman, K.
E. Predictors of smoking cessation and maintenance. Journal of clinical psychology 54,
223-235 (1998).
12 al'Absi, M.
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical responses to psychological stress and
risk for smoking relapse. International
journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International
Organization of Psychophysiology 59,
218-227, doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.010 (2006).
13 Hughes, J. R. Smokers' beliefs about
the inability to stop smoking. Addictive
behaviors 34, 1005-1009 (2009).
14 Shiffman, S. et al. Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: an analysis
from ecological momentary assessment. Journal
of abnormal psychology 111, 531
(2002).
15 Shiffman, S. Relapse following
smoking cessation: a situational analysis. Journal
of consulting and clinical psychology 50,
71 (1982).
16 Mantsch, J. R., Baker, D. A., Funk,
D., Lê, A. D. & Shaham, Y. Stress-induced reinstatement of drug seeking: 20
years of progress. Neuropsychopharmacology
: official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 335-356 (2016).
17 Feltenstein, M. W., Ghee, S. M. &
See, R. E. Nicotine self-administration and reinstatement of nicotine-seeking
in male and female rats. Drug and alcohol
dependence 121, 240-246 (2012).
18 Buczek, Y., Le, A., Wang, A.,
Stewart, J. & Shaham, Y. Stress reinstates nicotine seeking but not sucrose
solution seeking in rats. Psychopharmacology
144, 183-188 (1999).
19 Liu, X., Caggiula, A. R., Palmatier,
M. I., Donny, E. C. & Sved, A. F. Cue-induced reinstatement of
nicotine-seeking behavior in rats: effect of bupropion, persistence over
repeated tests, and its dependence on training dose. Psychopharmacology 196,
365-375 (2008).
20 Liu, X. et al. Reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior by
drug-associated stimuli after extinction in rats. Psychopharmacology 184,
417-425 (2006).
21 Dagher, A., Tannenbaum, B., Hayashi,
T., Pruessner, J. C. & McBride, D. An acute psychosocial stress enhances
the neural response to smoking cues. Brain
research 1293, 40-48,
doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.048 (2009).
22 Potenza, M. N. et al. Neural correlates of stress-induced and cue-induced drug
craving: influences of sex and cocaine dependence. The American journal of psychiatry 169, 406-414, doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020289 (2012).
23 Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T.,
Frecker, R. C. & FAGERSTROM, K. O. The Fagerström test for nicotine
dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British journal of addiction 86, 1119-1127 (1991).
24 Chase, H. W., Eickhoff, S. B., Laird,
A. R. & Hogarth, L. The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and
craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Biological psychiatry 70, 785-793 (2011).
25 Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A. &
Fiez, J. A. Prefrontal responses to drug cues: a neurocognitive analysis. Nature neuroscience 7, 211-214 (2004).