Ahmad Mayeli1,2, Vadim Zotev1, Raquel Phillips1, Hazem Refai2, Martin Paulus1, and Jerzy Bodurka1,3
1Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States, 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, United States, 3College of Engineering, Stephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, United States
Synopsis
In this study, we have examined the feasibility of training healthy
human subjects to self-regulate the hemodynamic activity of the vmPFC using real-time
fMRI neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf). Eight healthy subjects took part in experimental
group with real rtfMRI neurofeedback from vmPFC and four in control group with a
sham feedback from HIPS region. The results show significant vmPFC BOLD activity
differences between the groups, demonstrating the feasibility of targeted
modulation of the vmPFC using the rtfMRI-nf.
Purpose
Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf)
allows individuals to regulate hemodynamic activity of a target brain region in
real time1,2. Studies employing rtfMRI-nf have demonstrated
participants’ ability to learn volitional control of neurophysiological
activity in various brain regions, including the amygdala, anterior cingulate
cortex and parahippocampal cortex2,3,4. The ventromedial prefrontal
cortex (vmPFC) plays important roles in regulation of anxious emotion and persistence
responses in the face of uncontrollable setbacks5, 6. Furthermore, the
vmPFC is one of the critical loci of a dynamic and flexible neural circuit that
may underlie emotional and behavioral control and active resilient coping7.
In this study, we examined the feasibility of training healthy human subjects
to self-regulate the hemodynamic activity of the vmPFC. Participants in the
experimental group were provided with an ongoing information about the blood
oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activity in the vmPFC in the form of
rtfMRI-nf signal (variable-height bar). They were instructed to raise the rtfMRI-nf
signal by self-relevant value-based thinking, e.g. “think of situation that
make you feel accomplish, competent, or good at something”. Participants in the
control group performed the same task. However they were provided with a sham neurofeedback
based on BOLD activity of the left horizontal segment of the intraparietal
sulcus (HIPS) region instead. The results show significant vmPFC BOLD activity differences
between the groups, demonstrating the feasibility of targeted modulation of the
vmPFC using the rtfMRI-nf. Methods
The study included 12 healthy subjects (6 females). The experiments
were performed using GE MR750 3T MRI scanner with the 8-channel receive-only head
coil. For the whole brain fMRI, a single-shot gradient echo EPI with
sensitivity encoding (SENSE8) with FOV/slice=240/2.9mm,
TR/TE=2000/30ms, SENSE acceleration R=2, 96×96, flip=90°, 34 axial slices was
employed. T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence was used for anatomical reference and to
define ROIs. We implemented the neurofeedback
stimulus via our custom real-time fMRI system9 utilizing the
real-time features of AFNI10 and a custom developed graphic user
interface (GUI) software. For each subject, three spherical ROIs (7 mm radius
in Talairach space) were transformed to the EPI image space using each
subject’s high resolution MPRAGE structural data. These ROIs are defined at the
vmPFC, left Amygdala and the left horizontal segment of intraparietal sulcus
(HIPS) region. AFNI real-time plug-in was used to perform volume registration
of EPI images in our neurofeedback implementation and to export mean values of
fMRI signals for the three ROIs in real time.
An average fMRI signal from the target ROI updated every 2s and was
presented as a red bar (Fig.1). Eight subjects took part in experimental group
with real rtfMRI neurofeedback (target ROI: vmPFC). For the other 4 subjects, a
sham feedback from HIPS region was provided during neurofeedback runs. The
experiment design is shown on Fig. 1. Each run (except Rest) starts with a 40 s
rest block and a 40 s count block respectively, proceeding with 40 s long block
with Think, and Count conditions. For the Think condition, the subject was
asked to think about thoughts that are important for them which are specific,
vivid, and highly arousing in order to activate vmPFC so as to raise the level
of the red bar displayed on the screen. The target level (blue bar) was raised
from run to run. No neurofeedback was provided (no bars displayed) during the
Rest and Count conditions or during the entire Recall and Transfer runs. The
fMRI data analysis was performed in AFNI based on GLM analysis described
elsewhere2. Results
Figure 2 exhibits the average fMRI signal changes for the vmPFC
during the Think condition compared to the Count condition for each
neurofeedback run for the experimental and sham groups. The results show that
(1) recall of self-relevant value-based thoughts robustly activates vmPFC, (2) subjects
in experimental group are able to increase vmPFC activation during all
neurofeedback runs, (3) subjects in the experimental condition show significant
vmPFC activation during the transfer run.Discussion and conclusion
Our preliminary results demonstrate that by using rtfMRI-nf from
the vmPFC during recall of self-relevant value-based thoughts, healthy individuals
can learn to self-regulate their vmPFC BOLD responses.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Laureate Institute for Brain
Research.References
[1] deCharms RC, et
al. Applications of real-time fMRI. Nat. Rev.
Neurosci. 2008; 9:721.
[2] Zotev V, et
al. Self-regulation of amygdala
activation using real-time fMRI neurofeedback. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e24522.
[3] deCharms RC, et al. Control over
brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005; 102:18626.
[4] Weiskopf N, et al. Self-regulation
of local brain activity using real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI). J. Physiol. Paris 2004; 98: 357.
[5] Somerville
LH, et al. Interactions between transient and sustained neural signals support
the generation and regulation of anxious emotion. Cereb Cortex 2013; 23: 49.
[6] Bhanji
JP, et al. Perceived control influences neural responses to setbacks and promotes
persistence. Neuron 2014; 83:1369.
[7] Sinha R, et al. (2016) Dynamic
neural activity during stress signals resilient coping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
2016; 113: 8837.
[8] Pruessmann KP, et al. (1999)
SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 42:952.
[9] Bodurka
J. Real time software for monitoring MRI
scanner operation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Human Brain Mapping
Conference, Melbourne. Neuroimage 2008; 41(Supp. 1): S85.
[10] Cox
RW. Jesmanowicz A. Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Magn.
Reson. Med. 1999: 42: 1014.