An insight into the layered functional organization of grey matter can be offered by spatially accurate high resolution measurements of the laminar BOLD signal. However, their specificity is limited by anatomical, physiological and methodological features affecting the functional point spread function (fPSF). In order to examine these, an integrated model of the laminar GRE-BOLD signal has been formulated that combines a vascular geometric model of the cortex with a model describing the relationship between underlying physiological parameters and R2* changes. Using the new detailed model we are able to characterize the laminar GRE-BOLD signal dependency on physiological and partial volume effects.
1 - I. Markuerkiaga, M. Barth, and D. G. Norris, “A cortical vascular model for examining the specificity of the laminar BOLD signal,” Neuroimage, vol. 132, pp. 491–498, 2016.
2 - S. Sakadžić, E. T. Mandeville, L. Gagnon, J. J. Musacchia, M. A. Yaseen, M. A. Yucel, J. Lefebvre, F. Lesage, M. Anders, K. Eikermann-haerter, C. Ayata, V. J. Srinivasan, E. H. Lo, A. Devor, and D. A. Boas, “margin of oxygen supply to cerebral tissue,” Nat Commun, vol. 5, no. 5734, 2015.
3 - V. E. M. Griffeth and R. B. Buxton, “A theoretical framework for estimating cerebral oxygen metabolism changes using the calibrated-BOLD method: modeling the effects of blood volume distribution, hematocrit, oxygen extraction fraction, and tissue signal properties on the BOLD signal.,” Neuroimage, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 198–212, Sep. 2011.
4 - M. Bianciardi, M. Fukunaga, P. van Gelderen, J. A. de Zwart, and J. H. Duyn, “Negative BOLD-fMRI signals in large cerebral veins.,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 401–12, 2011.
5 - J. R. Gawryluk, E. L. Mazerolle, and R. C. N. D’Arcy, “Does functional MRI detect activation in white matter? A review of emerging evidence, issues, and future directions,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 8 JUL, pp. 1–12, 2014.
Figure 1 - Vascular model diagram and defining equations.
A: Diagram of vascular model from baseline (1) to activate state (4). SO2 denotes O2 saturation.
B: 1- the radii of ICAs and ICVs (rICA,ICV) are calculated as per 1 and changes in blood flow (CBF) and volume (V) are related by Grubb’s law. 2- O2 metabolism (CMRO2) is related to O2 concentration (C·O2) and O2 extraction fraction (OEF). 3- the BOLD signal is calculated for each vascular compartment as per 3 (please refer therein for notation). Equations valid in any i-th voxel (unless specified), 0 denotes baseline.
Figure 2 - Simulation flowchart.
A: Details about the vascular anatomy of interest, physiology and experimental design are defined.
B: The simulated GM signal (ΔS/S0 GM) is obtained from the new detailed model of laminar BOLD signal, in which a vascular model (extended from 1) and a model relating physiological changes to ΔR2* (adapted from 3) are coupled by accounting for the O2 transport and metabolism (see Fig. 1).
C: Further optional steps include simulating the effect of imaging a geometrically complex portion of the cortex (CONVOLUTION, as per 1) and PARTIAL VOLUME (both used in Fig. 5).
Figure 3 - Accounting for the ICAs in the cortex.
A-B: Vascular distribution across the primary visual cortex with and without ICAs (as per 1). The volume and structure of ICAs was assumed equal to that of the ICVs while the microvascular blood volume (arterioles, capillaries, venules) was decreased to match the total cerebrovascular volume for better comparison.
C-D: calculated fPSFs normalised to the relative maximum value (in the “sampling voxels”).
E-F: BOLD signal composition following for the same arbitrary activation with TE = 28 ms, n (=ΔCBF/ΔCMRO2) = 2, ΔCMRO2 = 20% and OEF0 = 0.4 (for the “sampling voxels”).
Figure 4 - Effect of variation in experimental and physiological parameters on the BOLD cortical profile.
BOLD signals due to changes in TE, n (=ΔCBF/ΔCMRO2), ΔCMRO2 and OEF0 (baseline oxygen extraction fraction) simulated from the model with and without ICAs (first and second row respectively). Different shades of grey express the change in the relative parameter from the original arbitrary activation (in red – same one as shown in blue in Fig. 2, E-F), with the following values: TE = 28 ms, n = 2, ΔCMRO2 = 20% and OEF0 = 0.4.
Figure 5 - Approaching the real-case: effects on BOLD laminar profiles.
Simulated BOLD signals following activation from shallower to deeper cortical depth (left to right), with and without ICAs (top and bottom).
Plotted are the signal obtained for GM, WM and PIAL compartments in “simulation voxels” (red), the same signal for “sampling voxels” after convolution (CONV) with a kernel (black) and finally after the effect of partial volume (PV) was simulated (blue, mean and standard deviation bars).
Dashed vertical lines show boundaries between GM, WM and PIAL compartments. Top-left panel: dimensions of the simulation and sampling imaging windows (fully shifted).