Michal Rivlin1, Daniel Barazany2, and Gil Navon1
1School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Neurobiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Synopsis
In
our previous work using preclinical 7T MRI scanner we have shown that tumors in
mice can be imaged using CEST-MRI of glucosamine. Moving toward clinical application,
considering the excellent safety profile of glucosamine, we tested the CEST-MRI
of glucosamine on a 3T clinical scanner. Here we report significant CEST MRI
signal up to ~3.5 ppm from the water signal corresponding to the exchangeable
protons of the glucosamine hydroxyls and amine residues. Thus, CEST MRI using
glucosamine has the potential to report on the activity of tumor metabolism,
noninvasively by using MRI.
INTRODUCTION
The efficacy of
glucosamine (GlcN) as an agent for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
MR molecular imaging of tumors was recently demonstrated in several animals' tumor
models1. We suggest applying GlcN CEST-based MRI to
develop novel molecular imaging modality for tumor and metastases detection and
follow-up; the potential of clinical application of CEST MRI with GlcN is
strengthened by its lack of toxicity as can be indicated from its wide use as
food supplement2. Here, the translation of GlcN CEST MRI method to
clinical MRI scanner was examined, in order to evaluate the feasibility of the
new contrast agent to obtain new class of images.METHODS
In vitro experiments were performed on
phantoms consisted of GlcN sulfate solutions (25-55 mM). MRI scans were
conducted on a 3T Siemens Prisma clinical MRI scanner system. Images were
acquired at room temperature using a 64-channel phased-array head coil for RF
reception. The CEST protocol includes series of frequencies, using a train of 3-30
gauss saturation pulses with 50-100 ms long, interpulse delay of 22-61 ms and 2
s pause between measurements, saturation attenuations were in the range of 1.0-3.0
μT. The images were acquired using a single-shot turbo gradient echo with cubic
resolution of 3 mm3. TR/TE/flip angle = 5.2 ms/2.7 ms/10o,
resulting in a scan time under 3 minutes.RESULTS
We demonstrated that GlcN can be detected by
CEST- MRI at clinical scanner (3T). Several choices of irradiation parameters
were tested, representative results are shown in figures 1 and 2. The MTRasym
plot of 25-55 mM GlcN solutions showed significant signal in the hydroxyls
regions over the entire saturation frequency offset range, the signal was
proportional to the concentration (Fig.1). GlcN CEST signal was examined in
terms of saturation pulse duration (Fig.1) as well as saturation attenuation (Fig.
2). As there is some overlap in GlcN signal when measured at different saturation
pulse durations, the preferred parameters for the CEST experiment will be those
that will give maximum signal with minimum transmission time (low SAR). The average
magnitudes of CEST signal obtained with B1=3 μT
and a total saturation pulse duration of 2.75 s were 2.6 and 1.8% per 10 mM at
frequencies offsets of 1.4 and 2.4 ppm respectively corresponding to the exchangeable
protons of the hydroxyls at the 3,4 and at the 1 positions, respectively. The CEST
contrast achieved at ~3.2 ppm may be dominated by the amine protons transfer
effect3. In that range, the average CEST signal was 1.1% per 10 mM of
the agent.DISCUSSION
Initial phantom GlcN CEST MRI experiments at
3T have shown promising practical utility for evaluating cancer. GlcN generates
a significant CEST MRI signal up to ~3.5 ppm from the water signal, likely
arises from a mixture of GlcN hydroxyl protons groups and amine protons group.
In tumor cells, the signal is expected to be higher owing to the contribution
of GlcN metabolic products (that accumulate in the cells), thus GlcN CEST MRI
signal has the potential to report on the activity of tumor metabolism. The
amine protons of GlcN can produce clinical CEST MRI contrast with selective
saturation at 3.2 ppm, even at the lower magnetic field strength (3T).
Generally, the rate of chemical exchange of amine protons with water is
relative fast and might be too fast to generate CEST at high pH (>7.0). But,
an acidic tumor microenvironment of pH<7.0 may slows the chemical exchange
of these protons, causing an increase in CEST contrast.CONCLUSIONS
These findings provide preliminary support for
the potential use of GlcN as a new MRI contrast agent to detect tumors, tumor
response to therapy and tumors metabolism, noninvasively by using MRI.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Rivlin, M, Navon, G. Glucosamine and
N-acetyl glucosamine as new CEST MRI agents for molecular imaging of tumors. Scientific
Reports Nature 2016; 6 (32648) doi:10.1038/srep32648.
2. Anderson, JW et al.
Glucosamine effects in humans: a review of
effects on glucose metabolism, side effects, safety considerations and
efficacy. Food Chem Toxicol 2005;43(2):187-201.
3. Consuelo N, Beecher and
Cynthia K. Larive, 1H and 15N NMR Characterization of the
Amine Groups of Heparan Sulfate Related Glucosamine Monosaccharides in Aqueous
Solution. Analytical Chemistry. 2015; 87(13): 6842-6848.