Exact sequence modelling using the Bloch equations is employed to directly extract quantitative T1 and T2 relaxation maps from standard MRI sequences. The need for excess specialized sequences was eliminated by measuring relaxation directly from T1, T2, and PD-weighted images, and a rapid B1 map. This approach enables wider use of quantitative MRI.
A flowchart of the image processing steps is shown in Figure 1.
MRI Acquisition: Eight volunteers (mean age 29, range 23-34 years, 4 male) were imaged on a 3T Siemens Prisma MRI system. Dual-Echo TSE (TE=10.3,92.7ms; TR=5s; turbo factor=8; refocussing angle=165⁰; 2 concatenations; TA=5:24), and T1-weighted TSE (TE=10.3; TR=600ms; turbo factor=8; refocussing angle=165⁰; 4 concatenations; TA=1:20) images were acquired in 2D interleaved multi-slice axial acquisitions with 30 contiguous slices with odd and even slices acquired on separate acquisitions to minimize incidental magnetization transfer (MT) (voxel size=0.86×0.86×3mm3; typical matrix=256×208). TSE sequences were repeated in a single-slice implementation.
Flip angle maps (B1) were collected on all subjects using a Bloch-Seigert approach2 (TE=2.24ms; TR=16150ms, flip angle=80°; voxel size=1.1x1.1x3.0mm; TA=0:33). B1 maps were interpolated to match TSE data. B1 is expressed as a normalized parameter relating the actual and prescribed flip angle: α=B1αprescribed.
For traditional gold standard relaxation measurement, single-slice multi-echo spin echo (TE=10–200 ms with 10 ms spacing; TR=5 s; refocussing angle=180⁰), and an inversion recovery (IR) experiment (eight inversion-prepared TSE; inversion time (TI)=[50,100,200,500,1000,2200,3000,4500ms]; TE=10ms; TR= TI+5s) were performed.
T1 and T2 fitting of TSE data: Steady-state slice-selective TSE sequences were simulated using Bloch equations, similar to previously described1, including detailed sequence parameters (gradient and RF pulse shapes and timing). Lookup-tables of signal intensities were generated for both the dual-echo and T1 weighted sequences for a range of T1 (300-3500ms), T2 (20-200ms), and B1 (0.6-1.4), at each echo time in the readout train. Fitting for T1, T2 and amplitude is performed by comparing signal intensities to the lookup table cross-section corresponding to the measured B1.
Gold standard relaxation mapping: The IR data was fit pixel by pixel for T1 via S = S0(1-f exp(-TI/T1)), where f is inversion efficiency. MESE data was fit for T2 with indirect and stimulated echo compensation, as previously described3.
Statistics: Normality was checked with Q-Q plots and histograms. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare fitting methods (α=0.05), with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Methods were also compared with Bland-Altman plots4.
We would like to thank Peter Šereš for assistance with data collection. Grant support was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC). Salary support for KCM was provided by scholarships from NSERC, and Alberta Innovates Health Solutions.
1. McPhee KC, Wilman AH. T2 quantification from only proton density and T2-weighted MRI by modelling actual refocusing angles. NeuroImage. 2015 Sep;118:642–50.
2. Sacolick LI, Wiesinger F, Hancu I, Vogel MW. B1 mapping by Bloch-Siegert shift. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(5):1315–1322.
3. McPhee KC, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxation and flip angle mapping: Evaluation of simultaneous and independent methods using multiple spin echoes. Magn Reson Med. 2017 May 1;77(5):2057–65.
4. Bland, Martin J, Altman D. Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. The Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;327(8476):307–10.
5. Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, Ball WS. NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI. 1999 Apr;9(4):531–8.
* indicates the value is significantly different compared to gold standard.
† indicates value derived from the multi-slice protocol is significantly different from the value derived from the single-slice protocol.