Deep Gandhi1, Prateek Kalra2, Huiming Dong1, Brian Raterman2, and Arunark Kolipaka2
1Biomedical Engineering, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Stiffness
change has been associated with progress of disease. Magnetic resonance
elastography(MRE) is an imaging-based alternative that can measure stiffness. Diffusion
Tensor Imaging(DTI) provides apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) and fractional
anisotropy(FA) of the tissue. Previous studies have investigated stiffness and
diffusion in kidneys individually. However, none of the studies have investigated the two together. Aim of this study is to show reproducibility of spin-echo
echo-planar imaging(SE-EPI) MRE and correlate it with ADC and FA measurements obtained
from DTI. Preliminary results showed good reproducibility in stiffness
measurements and moderate correlation between MRE stiffness and ADC and FA
values from DTI.
Introduction
There
are a wide variety of kidney diseases, many of which are life threatening and
could result in death. The current non-invasive methods used for diagnosing kidney
diseases such as Ultrasound, CT and MRI are based on observing structural
changes in kidneys which occurs after the disease has progressed. Magnetic
Resonance Elastography(MRE) is an imaging-based alternative to palpation[1]
which can show the change in stiffness when the disease is still progressing. Diffusion
Tensor Imaging(DTI) provides information about diffusion of water molecules,
which is useful in diagnosing different diseases based on diffusion coefficient
and anisotropy of the tissue. It also provides us information about the tissue
anisotropy by the Fractional Anisotropy value. The kidney function changes
during pathological states and this is reflected by changes in the apparent
diffusion co-efficient(ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values[2].
The aim of this study is to show the reproducibility of SE-EPI MRE and also to
correlate the stiffness obtained from SE-EPI MRE to ADC, FA values obtained
from DTI as none of the previous studies have investigated it. Methods
All imaging was performed using a 3T
MRI scanner (Tim Trio, Siemens Healthcare). Written informed consent was obtained
from all healthy volunteers (n=4, age range:22-29 years). Coronal slices were
obtained using SE-EPI MRE pulse sequences. Volunteers were laid supine with
head first in the MR scanner as shown in figure 1. 60 Hz external vibrations
were introduced through a soft driver with one pad for each kidney [3].
The driver pads were placed on the posterior side between the sternum and the umbilicus. For
reproducibility study after the first scan the volunteers were asked to leave
the scan room and repositioned for a repeat scan with the same imaging
parameters
Imaging parameters for SE-EPI MRE
included:FOV=500x500mm2, TR=750ms, TE=40.7ms, EPI-factor=63 matrix
size=128x128 reconstructed to 256x256, slice thickness=6mm, number of slices=5,
MRE phase offsets=4. All slices were acquired in a 18 sec breath hold. Motion
encoding gradient of 60Hz was applied separately in the x, y and z directions
to encode in-plane and through plane displacement fields for SE-EPI MRE. MRE
images were masked to obtain the kidney region and a 4th order
Butterworth bandpass directional filter(10-40 waves/FOV) was applied to remove
longitudinal component of motion and reflected waves. Finally, 3D local
frequency estimation(LFE) was performed to obtain weighted stiffness map using
MRE-Lab(Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).
Imaging parameters for DTI included:FOV=500x500mm2,
TR=1000 ms, TE=67ms, slice thickness=6mm, number of averages=1,
b-value=50,400 and 1000s/mm2, matrix size=128x128 reconstructed to 256x256,
number of slice=5 and diffusion directions=6. All slices were acquired in a 21
sec breath hold. The ADC and FA maps obtained from the scanner were then used
to draw ROI on both kidneys individually to get ADC and FA values for cortex
and medulla for all 4 healthy volunteers. Results
Figure 2 displays the magnitude image in one
of the volunteers, and snapshot of one of the time points of wave propagation
in three spatial directions x, y and z and the corresponding 3D weighted
stiffness map for initial and the repeat scan respectively. Mean stiffness of kidneys
across all 4 healthy volunteers was found to be 3.497±0.66 kPa for left
kidney and 3.817±0.71 kPa for the right kidney for initial scan and 3.535±0.71 kPa for left kidney and 3.841 ± 0.77 kPa for the right kidney for the
repeat scan. Figure 3 shows the correlation between SE-EPI MRE scan 1 and scan 2 for left and right kidneys.
The mean ADC value was observed to be
2.17±0.26x10-3 mm2/s for left kidney and 1.857±0.15x10-3
mm2/s for right kidney. Similarly, mean FA value was observed to be 0.482±0.13 for left kidney and 0.49±0.12 for right kidney. These values fall within
the range of values reported earlier [4] .Figure 4 shows
the correlation between stiffness observed using SE-EPI MRE sequence and ADC
value as well as SE-EPI MRE sequence and FA value obtained from the DTI scan. Figure
5 shows correlation of stiffness with ADC and FA values of cortex and medulla for both kidneys. Discussion and Conclusion
Preliminary results demonstrated good correlation
between the stiffness values obtained using the initial and repeat scan for
left kidney(R2=0.81) and right kidney(R2=0.88). A moderate
correlation was found between kidney stiffness and ADC values (R2=0.37) as well as between kidney stiffness and FA values(R2=0.21) shown in Figure 4. We expect the correlation between stiffness and ADC as well
as stiffness and FA to be improved with increase in sample size.
Acknowledgements
NIH-NHLBI:
R01HL124096 References
[1] Mariappan
et al. Clin Anat. 2010 Jul; 23(5): 497–511.
[2] Takahashi et. al. Curr
Opin Nephrol Hypertens.
2015 May ; 24(3): 217–223.
[3] Gavin Low et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015
Sep; 42(3): 844–850.
[4] Aki
Kido et. al Diffusion tensor MRI of the kidney at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla, Acta
Radiologica, 51:9, 1059-1063