Alexey V. Dimov1,2, Ajay Gupta1, Brian H. Kopell3, and Yi Wang1,2
1Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States, 2Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 3Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
In this work, we
investigate the use of a sub-millimeter quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)
protocol for preoperative imaging of the suthalamic nucleui (STN) for planning
of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Image scoring revealed superior performance of
QSM compared to the conventional T2 weighted (T2W) protocol. In contrast to
T2W, image scores further increased for QSM when resolution was increased.
Target audience
researchers
and clinicians interested in deep gray matter structures imaging and deep brain
stimulation (DBS).Purpose
Accurate
depiction of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is crucial for DBS surgery planning used
in treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) [1-3]. Quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) has been shown to be superior to traditional T2
weighted spin echo imaging (T2w) [4,5]. The aim of the study was to describe a sub-millimeter
QSM protocol for preoperative imaging of the STN in planning of DBS.Methods
7
healthy volunteers were included in this study. T2w and QSM were obtained for all
healthy volunteers, and images of different resolutions were reconstructed.
Image quality and visibility of STN anatomical features were analyzed by a
radiologist using a 5 point scale. To characterize visibility of each STN
quadrant on QSM and T2w images, their CNRs with respect to immediately adjacent
white matter (WM) were calculated for each slice resolution according to the
following definition: $$$CNR_{WM} = \frac{|I_j-I_{wm}|}{\sigma_{wm}}$$$.
Here $$$I_j$$$ is the average intensity of one of the four
STN quadrants, $$$I_{wm}$$$ is average WM intensity and $$$\sigma_{wm}$$$ is the standard deviation of intensity within
the closest white matter sector. To assess the sensitivity of each sequence to
the heterogeneous distribution of iron within the STN, contrast ratios between
adjacent quadrants were estimated. The contrast ratio between regions i and j was defined as $$$CR_{ij} = \frac{I_i-I_j}{I_j}$$$.
Statistical analysis was performed using
MATLAB routines. Comparisons of CNR values for each resolution were performed
using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. For
visualization scores, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was employed to test the image
score differences between imaging methods for both resolutions.
Additionally,
data from 10 retrospectively and randomly selected PD patients who underwent 3T
MRI for DBS were analyzed for STN size and susceptibility gradient
measurements.Results
The
average visualization scores for QSM and T2w images in high/low resolutions
were, 3.86/2.0 and 1.886/1.0, respectively. The difference between scores for
high resolution QSM and T2w images was significant (p<0.005), while no statistically
significant difference was observed in the low resolution image sets. Switching
to high resolution led to a statically significant increase in the
radiologist’s assessment of the QSM images (p<0.005), but not of the T2w images.
Higher
contrast-to-noise (CNR) values were observed in both high and low resolution
QSM images. Inter-resolution comparison demonstrated improvement in CNR for QSM
(p<0.05, Table 2), but not for T2w images. QSM provided higher
inter-quadrant contrast ratios (CR) within the STN, and depicted a gradient in
the distribution of susceptibility sources not visible in T2w images.
STN
sizes along its three main axes (mediodorsal-lateroventral, dorsolateral-ventromedial
and rostro-caudal) were $$$(3.2±0.3)\times(5.3±0.3)\times(11.8±0.9)$$$ mm3
for the left and $$$(3.1±0.2)\times(5.3±0.4)\times(11.0±0.9)$$$
mm3
for the right STN. The STN susceptibility gradient over all healthy subjects was $$$-0.022±0.004$$$ ppm/mm.
Patients study
QSM was successfully
reconstructed in all 10 patient cases. Figure 4 shows QSM of the STN in the axial
and coronal planes. In all cases, high contrast between STN and white matter,
and the ability to distinguish it from the SN were achieved. The measured
dimensions were $$$(3.2±0.2)\times(5.6±0.6)\times(12.5±1.7)$$$
mm3
for the left and $$$(3.1±0.2)\times(5.5±0.5)\times(11.8±1.8)$$$
mm3
for the right nucleus. The average QSM STN gradients were $$$-0.026±0.009$$$
ppm/mm and $$$-0.029±0.008$$$ ppm/mm for the left and right nuclei, respectively.
Discussion
QSM can be used to
overcome inadequacies of relaxation-based contrasts in T2w MRI. The comparative
analyses of QSM and T2w presented here suggest that susceptibility mapping is
better suited for high resolution preoperative STN imaging. QSM can offer
better visualization of the iron distribution within the STN, providing identification
of optimal DBS targeting sites. The
qualitative and quantitative results suggest that QSM – unlike T2w – benefits
from high resolution acquisition, which makes it valuable for accurate
segmentation of the target areas without the need for image interpolation.Conclusion
For 3T MRI,
sub-millimeter QSM provides accurate delineation of the anatomical STN features
for DBS targeting.Acknowledgements
This
investigation was supported in part by grants R01CA178007-05, R01CA178007-04,
R21EB024366-01, R01NS090464-02, R01NS095562-02, R01NS095562-01A1, S10OD021782-01
from National Institutes of Health.References
[1]
Wodarg F. et al, Stimulation site within the MRI-defined STN predicts
postoperative motor outcome. Movement Disorders 27:874-879, 2012
[2]
Akram H. et al, Subthalamic deep brain stimulation sweet spots and hyperdirect
cortical connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 158:332-345, 2017
[3]
Bronstein JM. et al, Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert
consensus and review of key issues. Arch Neurol 68:165, 2011
[4]
Liu T. et al, Improved Subthalamic Nucleus Depiction with Quantitative
Susceptibility Mapping. Radiology 269:216-223, 2013
[5]
Schafer A. et al, Direct visualization of the subthalamic nucleus and its iron
distribution using high-resolution susceptibility mapping. Human Brain Mapping
33:2831-2842, 2012