Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

2200

Magnetic susceptibility source separation using multi-echo GRE data only
Taehyun Hwang1, Jingu Lee1, Hyeong-Geol Shin1, Doohee Lee1, Joon Yul Choi1, Hyunsung Eun1, Yoonho Nam2, and Jongho Lee1

1Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Colleg of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Synopsis

In this work, we explored an alternative approach of using nominal R2 instead of measured R2 in separating the two susceptibility sources. The linear relationship between R2 and R2 was investigated and used to obtain the nominal R2 values. The positive and negative magnetic susceptibility source maps using nominal R2 showed similar susceptibility distribution to the map using measured R2.

Introduction

Recently, a new QSM algorithm that separates positive and negative susceptibility sources was proposed [1]. The method requires the estimation of R2 which is defined as R2R2 and, therefore, needs R2 measurement. However, acquiring R2 requires long scan time (10 min) and processing time (up to several hours) [2] and is not commonly performed in neuroimaging. In this work, we explored an alternative approach of using nominal R2 instead of measured R2 (= R2,measured) in susceptibility source separation. The method was applied to healthy volunteers and multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and the resulting susceptibility maps were compared with those from R2,measured.

Methods

[Estimating Nominal R2]

It has been shown that both R2 and R2 can be modeled as a linear equation to tissue susceptibility concentration [3-5]. Therefore, we can infer that the relationship between R2 and R2 is also linear. It can be written as follows:R2=aR2+bEq.[1] Once the two coefficients, a and b, are known, we can use R2 to estimate a nominal value of R2. To obtain the coefficients, two different approaches are tested. First, the measurements in a literature [3] lead to a=0.78 and b=6.07. The estimated R2 using these values is referred to as R2,nominal,lit. hereafter. The second approach is to acquire R2 and R2,measured from in-vivo data and then generate the coefficients using linear regression. This R2 is referred to as R2,nominal,fit.

[Experiments and data processing]

Four healthy volunteers and three MS patients were scanned at 3T. For R2, gradient-echo was acquired (healthy volunteers: resolution=1×1×2mm3, TR=53ms, and TE=5.1:5.0:30.0ms; MS patients: resolution=0.5×0.5×2mm3, TR=53ms, and TE=5.8:6.2:36.7ms). To estimate R2,measured, R2 was acquired using multi-echo spin-echo (healthy volunteers: resolution=1×1×2mm3, TR=2400ms, and TE=10:10:100ms; MS patients: resolution=0.5×0.5×2mm3, TR=1800ms, and TE=10:10:90ms). An R2 map was generated by mono-exponential fitting to the multi-echo data. An R2 map was generated after EPGSLR correction [2]. R2 was calculated by subtracting R2 from R2. The positive and negative susceptibility maps were acquired using [1].

To estimate the coefficients of R2,nominal,fit, a linear regression between R2 and R2,measured was performed for voxels in five regions (SN, RN, CN, GP and PU) in healthy volunteers. No white matter region was included as R2 has been shown to depend on not only susceptibility concentration but also fiber orientation [6, 7]. Outliers were removed using Cook’s distance [8]. The positive and negative susceptibility source maps from R2,measured, R2,nominal,fit, and R2,nominal,lit. were generated and compared. Thalamus, which includes iron-rich but myelin-lacking nuclei (pulvinar and nucleus medialis), and optic-radiation, which has myelin-rich but iron lacking region, were inspected [9-11]. The results were also compared in MS lesions.

Results

When relationship between R2 and R2 was explored, it showed a good linear relation (Fig. 1), agreeing with previous studies [3-5]. The slopes and offsets in [Eq. 1] of four healthy volunteers have similar values with small standard deviation (slope=0.675±0.021 and offset=8.21±0.499). Hence, we used R2,nominal,fit=0.675R28.21 hereafter. From the literature [3], we found R2,nominal,lit.=0.78R26.07. The positive and negative susceptibility source maps of a healthy volunteer are shown in Fig. 2. Overall, the maps show similar contrast distribution. However, the positive susceptiblity map using R2,nominal,lit. was slightly overestimated (Fig. 2a and c right column). When thalamus was zoomed in, pulvinar and nucleus medialis are delineated in the negative susceptibility maps using R2,measured and R2,nominal,fit images (Fig. 2a and b left column and middle column).

In MS patient results, all the positive maps show two ring-shaped lesions (Fig. 3), indicating iron accumulation at the rim of the lesions [12]. One of them shows potentially a feeding vein inside the lesion (Fig. 3; red box), which was still detectable but less apparent in the nominal R2 corrected images. The negative map using R2,measured shows a demyelinated lesion (Fig. 3d and e; green box), and a potentially partially remyelinated lesion (Fig. 3d and e; red box). Similar appearances are observed in the negative susceptibility maps using R2,nominal,fit, and R2,nominal,lit..

Discussion and Conclusion

In this work, we proposed a method to estimate nominal R2 for the separation of magnetic susceptibility sources without measuring R2. The resulting susceptibility maps using R2,nominal,fit showed similar distribution with those from R2,measured in healthy volunteers but the results are slightly different in MS lesions. On the other hand, when using R2,nominal,lit. for the separation, the susceptibility maps had higher values than those from R2,measured in both healthy volunteers and MS patients. The difference between R2,nominal,fit and R2,nominal,lit. may be explained by the different R2 estimation process. To estimate R2 reliably, we applied short echo spacing and EPGSLR correction which was not applied in [2].

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI17C1919010017).

References

[1] Lee, Jingu et al. “Separating positive and negative susceptibility sources in QSM.” ISMRM conference (2017).

[2] McPhee KC, Wilman AH. Transverse relaxation and flip angle mapping: Evaluation of simultaneous and independent methods using multiple spin echoes. Magn Reson Med 2017;77(5):2057-2065.

[3] Sedlacik, Jan, et al. "Reversible, irreversible and effective transverse relaxation rates in normal aging brain at 3T." Neuroimage 84 (2014): 1032-1041.

[4] C Langkammer, et al. “Quantitative MR imaging of brain iron: a postmortem validation study“, Radiology 257 (2010)

[5] Yao, Bing, et al. "Susceptibility contrast in high field MRI of human brain as a function of tissue iron content." Neuroimage 44.4 (2009): 1259-1266.

[6] Lee, Jongho, et al. "Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107.11 (2010): 5130-5135.

[7] Lee, Jingu, et al. "An R2* model of white matter for fiber orientation and myelin concentration." NeuroImage 162 (2017): 269-275.

[8] Cook, R. Dennis. "Detection of influential observation in linear regression." Technometrics 19.1 (1977): 15-18.

[9] Duyn, Jeff H., and John Schenck. "Contributions to magnetic susceptibility of brain tissue." NMR in biomedicine 30.4 (2017).

[10] Bender, B., et al. Optimized 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo: identification of thalamus substructures at 3T. American Journal of Neuroradiology 32.11 (2011): 2110-2115.

[11] Drayer, Burton, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron. American journal of neuroradiology 7.3 (1986): 373-380.

[12] Zhang, Y., et al. "Quantitative susceptibility mapping and R2* measured changes during white matter lesion development in multiple sclerosis: myelin breakdown, myelin debris degradation and removal, and iron accumulation." American Journal of Neuroradiology 37.9 (2016): 1629-1635.

Figures

Figure 1. Scatter plots and regression analysis of R2 and R2 in four healthy volunteers (HV) for the voxels in the five deep gray matter regions (SN, RN, CN, GP, and PU). The results show that four healthy volunteers have similar slopes and offsets.

Figure 2. Positive susceptibility (χpos) and negative susceptiblity (χneg) maps using R2,measured, R2,nominal,fit, and R2,nominal,lit. in a healthy volunteer. The zoomed-in area of top row shows thalamus, which includes well-known iron-rich but myelin-lacking pulvinar and nucleus medialis. The zoomed-in area of bottom row shows optic radiation, which includes well-known myelin-rich but iron-lacking region.

Figure 3. Positive susceptibility and negative susceptiblity maps using R2,measured, R2,nominal,fit, and R2,nominal,lit. in a MS patient. The two lesions (red and green boxes) show different appearances.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26 (2018)
2200