Functional Arterial Spin Labeling (fASL) provides important information of perfusion changes over time and is therefore suitable for detecting neuronal activation due to cognitive functions or motor tasks. However, the low signal to noise ratio of ASL images restrains its application in clinical and research areas. In this study we propose a method for denoising fASL data using infimal convolution of total generalized variations (ICTGV). Compared to standard Gaussian denoising ICTGV denoising incorporates spatial and temporal information of the perfusion weighted time series. This leads to a substantial improvement in noise-suppression for fASL data.
Four healthy volunteers were scanned at a 3T MR system (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Germany). Pulsed ASL measurements were performed using PICOR-Q2TIPS5 single shot EPI with a 20-channel head coil: 15 slices with 6mm thickness, distance factor 25%, 3x3mm in-plane resolution, 6/8 partial-Fourier, TR/TE = 2500/13ms, TI1/TI2 = 800/1800ms and labeling slice thickness 10cm. A block design paradigm with seven interleaved 30-second periods of rest and finger tapping (right hand) was conducted. Additionally a T1-weighted image was acquired for each subject using a 3D MPRAGE sequence with 1mm isotropic resolution. From one subject a synthetic CBF map was generated based on the T1w image.6 In this synthetic CBF map, voxels corresponding to activations due to motor tasks (voxels in the primary sensorimotor area, supplementary motor area and parietal and parietal associative area) are superimposed with a BOLD effect and ASL activation signal change (30s on/off, 7 runs) as shown in figure 1 and described in7. Zero mean Gaussian noise was added to this synthetic CBF map. ASL data processing and statistical analysis were conducted using MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts), SPM12, ASL-toolbox8,9 and in-house MATLAB scripts. Prior to denoising the fASL images were motion-corrected, detrended and surround subtraction was applied to eliminate BOLD signal contamination.10 Spatio-temporal denoising of the fASL data is done by solving the following minimization problem using Primal Dual algorithm11:
$$\min_{dM,v} \frac{\lambda}{2}\left\|dM - dM^{\delta}\right\|_2^2 + \gamma_1(s)TGV_{\alpha1,\alpha0,tsw1}(dM - v) + \gamma_2(s)TGV_{\alpha1,\alpha0,tsw2}(v)$$
where $$$\alpha1\,$$$and$$$\,\alpha0\ $$$ are fixed model parameters4, tsw1 and tsw2 are weightings between spatial and temporal regularization, the parameters s controls the weighting between the two TGV terms and is calculated as described in4, $$$\lambda$$$ denote the regularization parameter for the difference image dM, $$$dM^{\delta}$$$ are the acquired 4D PWI-images and $$$dM$$$ is the 4D denoised PWI image. For comparison the perfusion weighted images were denoised using a conventional 3D-Gaussian kernel of 6mm FWHM. CBF-maps were calculated from the perfusion weighted images using a general kinetic model.12 Task-based fASL analysis was performed in SPM12 for each subject. A general linear model (GLM) was used. The statistical maps were thresholded at p<0.05 after family-wise-error correction on overlayed on the coregistered T1w-images.
This work was funded by the Austrian Science Fund "SFB 3209-18".
NVIDIA Corporation Hardware grant support.
1. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, et al. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1992;23(1):37-45
2. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(1):212-6.
3. Raoult H, Petr J, Bannier E, et al. Arterial spin labeling for motor activation mapping at 3T with a 32-channel coil: reproducibility and spatial accuracy in comparison with BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage. 2011;58(1):157-67.
4. Schloegl M, Holler M, Schwarzl A, et al. Infimal Convolution of Total Generalized Variation Functionals for dynamic MRI. Magn. Reson Med. 2017;78(1):142-155.
5. Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA, et al. QUIPSS II with thin-slice TI1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41(6):1246-1254.
6. Bibic A, Knutsson L, Ståhlberg F, et al. Denoising of arterial spin labeling data: wavelet-domain filtering compared with Gaussian smoothing. MAGMA. 2010;23(3):125-137.
7. Hernandez-Garcia L, Jahanian H, Rowe DB. Quantitative analysis of arterial spin labeling FMRI data using a general linear model. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28(7):919-27.
8. Wang Z, Aguirre GK, Rao H, et al. Empirical optimization of ASL data analysis using an ASL data processing toolbox: ASLtbx. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;26:261–269.
9. Wang Z. Improving cerebral blood flow quantification for arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI by removing residual motion artifacts and global signal fluctuations. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;30:1409–1415.
10. Lu H, Donahue MJ and van Zijl PC. Detrimental effects of BOLD signal in arterial spin labeling fMRI at high field strength. Magn. Reson Med. 2006;56(3):546-52.
11. Chambolle A, Pock T. A First-Order Primal-Dual Algorithm for Convex Problems with Applications to Imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 2010;40:120–145.
12. Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, et al. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998;40(3):383–396.