Synopsis
Precise implantation of deep brain stimulation
devices in Parkinson, primary dystonia or epilepsy patients requires
precise structural information about the thalamic region. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the capability of DWI in identifying thalamic substructures. Eight healthy volunteers underwent
ultra-high b-value DWI (5000 s/mm2) at 3T. Images were denoised using
total generalized variation and 7 substructures (Pulvinar and six nuclei) within the thalamus were drawn in and compared to histological
atlases. In all volunteers, all seven structures
could be identified due to signal intensities. High b-value
diffusion weighted imaging therefore shows great potential in determining thalamic substructures.
Introduction
In recent
years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) was discovered for treatment of various
neurological and psychological diseases. Primarily used in treatment of
Parkinson patients, the options nowadays include primary dystonia, epilepsy,
depression and others 1,2. New targets,
especially different thalamic nuclei, have been identified as target regions
for DBS 3. Implantation of
modern stimulation devices requires precise structural information of the human
brain fitted to patients’ individual anatomy. Planning of DBS implantation is
usually performed by conventional MRI- or CT-scans combined with stereotactical
anatomical atlases based on post mortem images. Stereotactical data have to be
applied to the patients’ brain 4,5. Therefore, it
would be helpful and lead to an increased accuracy of DBS implantation to
identify intrathalamic substructures, such as the different thalamic nuclei in
pre-interventional MR-imaging. Various approaches have been proposed during the
last years 6-8.Purpose
To evaluate the
capability of ultra-high b-value DWI in separating and identifying
intrathalamic substructures and to compare these images with post mortem
histological stereotactic atlases of the human brain. Finally, to introduce a
measurement protocol that could allow the pre-interventional and individual
stereotactical planning of DBS implantations.Material and methods
Eight healthy volunteers (mean age: 22.5 years, 4 male, 4
female) were recruited in a prospective MRI-study, approved by the
local institutional review board of our university hospital.
All subjects provided written informed consent, had to be
healthy without any cerebral illnesses or injuries, never underwent surgical intervention
in the brain region and didn’t receive steroid therapy at that time. No
contrast medium was used.
Measurements were performed on a 3T-MRI-scanner (Prisma
Fit, Siemens, Erlangen Germany), able to obtain relatively high b-values with
acceptable noise and vibration levels.
MPRAGE 3D sequence was used to reconstruct anatomically
correct images of the test persons’ brain and to plan acquisition of diffusion-weighted
images (DWI) in AC/PC orientation.
Spin-echo echo-planar imaging DWI sequence with b-values
of 0 (b0) and 5000 s/mm2 (b5000) was used and diffusion was encoded
in 64 directions. For b0, two and for b5000, five averages were measured. Other
imaging parameters were as follows: TR: 3300 ms, TE: 84 ms, FoV: 220x220 mm2,
slice thickness: 2 mm, slice number: 30.
DWI acquisition was focused on the thalamic and
subthalamic region.
Following to the MRI-Scan, images were denoised using total
generalized variation 9.
The images were evaluated on a Linux-Fedora-workstation
and 7 intrathalamic substructres (Pulvinar, Nuclei centrales, Nucleus medialis,
Nuclei ventrointermedii, Nuclei ventrocaudales, Nuclei ventroorales and Nucleus
lateropolaris thalami), defined prior to the evaluation, were identified and
drawn in by hand in the slice 4 mm above the AC/PC line. Later, the defined
substructures were compared to a histological stereotactical atlas of the brain
12.Results
In all volunteers, all seven intrathalamic
substrucutres could be identified due to different signal intensities.
Nuclei, which were drawn in based on DWI, corresponded
very well with the histological data from the atlas 12. In addition, high
concordance between the drawn in nuclei in the different subjects could be
shown.
No movement artefacts were observed and no noise and
vibration problems were declared by the patients.Discussion
Various techniques for identification of intrathalamic
nuclei have been reported previously 8,
10, 11. Unfortunately,
they are often associated with long acquisition time and complicated
post-processing procedures. High b-value DWI seems to present a new and simple
way to separate different thalamic substructures in pre-interventional
MR-imaging. Although, no
movement artefacts were observed in healthy subjects, acquisition time (17 minutes) may provide problems when applied in patients. Reduction of measured directions could reduce
acquisition time while capability of identification remains consistent.Conclusion
High b-value diffusion weighted imaging shows great
potential in determining thalamic substructures. Therefore, as it allows
individual mapping of the thalamic nuclei in pre-interventional MRI, it could
lead to better planning of DBS implantation in neurological and psychiatric
patients. Further investigations, trying to reduce the needed acquisition time,
may provide sequences that are more easily applicable to patients.Acknowledgements
Nils Christoph Nuessle was
supported by the doctoral scholarship IZKF of the medical faculty of Tuebingen.References
1. Almeida L, Deeb W, Spears
C, Opri E, Molina R, Martinez-Ramirez D, et al. Current Practice and the Future
of Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease. Semin Neurol.
2017;37(2):205-14.
2. Deeb W, Giordano JJ, Rossi PJ, Mogilner
AY, Gunduz A, Judy JW, et al. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Deep Brain
Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies. Front
Integr Neurosci. 2016;10:38.
3. Chen XL, Xiong YY, Xu GL, Liu XF. Deep
brain stimulation. Interv Neurol. 2013;1(3-4):200-12.
4. Rasul FT, Bal J, Pereira EA, Tisdall M,
Themistocleus M, Haliasos N. Current surgical options for the epileptic
patients. Curr Pharm
Des. 2017.
5. Ackermans L, Duits A, van
der Linden C, Tijssen M, Schruers K, Temel Y, et al. Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in
patients with Tourette syndrome. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 3):832-44.
6. Bender B, Wagner S, Klose U. Optimized
depiction of thalamic substructures with a combination of T1-MPRAGE and phase:
MPRAGE. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016.
7. Bender B, Manz C, Korn A, Nagele T,
Klose U. Optimized 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient
echo: identification of thalamus substructures at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2011;32(11):2110-5.
8. Tourdias T, Saranathan M, Levesque IR,
Su J, Rutt BK. Visualization of intra-thalamic nuclei with optimized
white-matter-nulled MPRAGE at 7T. Neuroimage. 2014;84:534-45.
9. Knoll F, Bredies K, Pock T, Stollberger
R. Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI. Magn Reson Med.
2011;65(2):480-91.
10. Deoni SC, Josseau MJ, Rutt BK, Peters TM.
Visualization of thalamic nuclei on high resolution, multi-averaged T1 and T2
maps acquired at 1.5 T. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(3):353-9.
11. Gringel T, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Elolf E,
Frolich A, Dechent P, Helms G. Optimized high-resolution mapping of
magnetization transfer (MT) at 3 Tesla for direct visualization of
substructures of the human thalamus in clinically feasible measurement time. J
Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(6):1285-92.
12. Schaltenbrand G, Wahren W, Atals for
Stereotaxy of the human brain, 2. Edition, Thieme, 1977, ISBN: 9783133937023