It is challenging for the routine clinical ocular MRI protocol to use a large FOV covering the whole orbits and sellar region with high spatial resolution relatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate custom-made ocular surface coil in diagnosing images for ocular masses and the optic nerve by comparing TSE DWI images. The dedicated ocular coil obtained large FOV and high spatial resolution images with higher SNR in TSE DW images as examples. The custom-made surface coil can demonstrate ocular masses and the optic nerve more clearly, and provide more details with high SNR in one-step.
Synopsis
It is challenging for the routine clinical ocular MRI protocol to use a large FOV covering the whole orbits and sellar region with high spatial resolution relatively. The aim of this study was to evaluate custom-made ocular surface coil in diagnosing images for ocular masses and the optic nerve by comparing TSE DWI images. The dedicated ocular coil obtained large FOV and high spatial resolution images with higher SNR in TSE DW images as examples. The custom-made surface coil can demonstrate ocular masses and the optic nerve more clearly, and provide more details with high SNR in one-step.Purpose
Material and Methods
The institutional review board approved the prospective study on five patients(3 men, 2 women; age range 39-69 years)with suspected ocular mass or optical nerve lesions underwent MRI examinations of orbits on a 3.0T MR station (Ingenia 3T, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) successively using a 8-channel head coil and a custom-made 360 degree ocular surface coil (Suzhou Medcoil Healthcare Co., Ltd). The ocular coil was tailored to obtain the signal in the deep orbits and sellar region. All patients underwent conventional MRI and turbo spin-echo DWI with b-values of 0 and 900 s/mm with the same sequence parameters. The image quality in DWI was qualitatively graded on by 2 readers in consensus on a 3-point scale from 1 (loss or indistinct), 2(partial and blurred) to 3 (full and clear) for the presence of optic nerve (Figure 1). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of images from the ocular surface coil was compared with the ones from the head coil. (Figure 2)Results
Both ocular masses and optic nerve showed more clearly in the DW images from the ocular surface coil (Figure 3E, 4A) than in the ones from the head coil (Figure 3B, 4B). The DW images from the ocular surface coil dedicated more internal details of the ocular mass than the ones from the head coil (Figure 3B). The presence of optic nerves was totally rated 3 in five patients in the DW images from the ocular surface coil, and rated 1 in two patients, 2 in two patients, and 3 in one patients in the DW images from the head coil. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DW images from the ocular surface coil was higher than the ones from the head coil (Table 1).Discussion and Conclusion
This study demonstrated that, comparing to previously used head coil and surface coils, the custom-made dedicated small ocular surface coils generated better images for both ocular masses and the optic nerve simultaneously with high spatial resolution and high SNR. The ocular masses imaging could benefit from its convenience in covering more regions. Both ocular masses and optic nerve showed more clearly and more details in the DW images from the ocular coil than in the images from the head coil. Moreover, the high quality of DW images offers unique insights into the internal microstructure and texture information, particularly with regard to pathology and genomics. It can improve our future ability to study ocular masses and optic nerve pathologies noninvasively, offer information in the differential diagnosis of ocular masses and monitor the changes of their treatment[5,6].1. de Graaf P, Pouwels PJ, Rodjan F, et al. Single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging for retinoblastoma: initial experience. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(1):110-118.
2. Hoch MJ, Bruno MT, Shepherd TM. Advanced MRI of the Optic Nerve. J Neuroophthalmol. 2017;37(2):187-196.
3.Erb-Eigner K, Willerding G, Taupitz M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of ocular melanoma. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(10):702-707.
4. Sepahdari AR, Aakalu VK, Setabutr P, et al. Indeterminate orbital masses: restricted diffusion at MR imaging with echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging predicts malignancy. Radiology. 2010;256(2):554-564.
5. Sepahdari AR, Kapur R, Aakalu VK, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant ocular masses: initial results and directions for further study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33(2):314-319.
6. Foti PV, Longo A, Reibaldi M, et al. Uveal melanoma: quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the response assessment after proton-beam therapy, long-term follow-up. Radiol Med. 2017;122(2):131-139.