Bing Tian1, Shahed Toossi1, Laura Eisenmenger1, Christopher Hess1, and David Saloner1
1UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Advances in vessel wall imaging techniques using high-resolution
MR sequences now allow for improved visualization of the walls of intracranial
vessels. In this study, we present results obtained with a 3D SPACE to
visualize the walls of intracranial aneurysms and to grade the extent of aneurysm
wall enhancement in subjects whose aneurysms were monitored over time. Our
studies showed that visualization of the aneurysm wall is significantly better
on post-contrast images than on pre-contrast images, and the majority of
unruptured aneurysms show wall enhancement. Furthermore, we found the wall enhancement
scores to remain essentially unchanged on follow up studies.
Purpose
High resolution MRI vessel wall imaging provides
important capabilities in assessment of intracranial vascular disease including
intracranial aneurysms. This study aims to compare the aneurysm wall
visualization on pre- and post- 3D isotropic T1-weighted fast-spin-echo
sequence (SPACE) images and to explore whether there is a change in wall
enhancement at follow up.Methods
Twenty-nine patients with thirty-five unruptured
intracranial aneurysms were scanned on a 3T Siemens Skyra scanner with pre- and
post-contrast 3D T1-weighted SPACE (0.5mm isotropic). Follow up studies were
performed on all patients. Aneurysm wall visibility and enhancement scores were
assigned by three neuroradiologists on pre- and post-contrast SPACE
respectively. The aneurysm wall visibility between pre- and post-contrast images
as well as the wall enhancement between follow up and baseline studies were
compared. Differences in wall visibility and enhancement were also investigated
as a function of aneurysm diameter and location.Results
Agreement among three reviewers in grading wall
visibility and enhancement was excellent. Post-contrast images had
significantly higher wall visibility compared to pre-contrast images. A wall
enhancement score ≥2 was found on 71% (25/35) of the aneurysms. Changes in
levels of wall enhancement were found on 17% (6/35) of the aneurysms at follow
up studies, but those changes were small. The wall of large aneurysms (≥7mm) was
better visualized than small aneurysms. Wall enhancement scores of large
aneurysms were significantly higher than that of small aneurysms. There was no
significant differences in aneurysm wall visibility and enhancement between
different locations. Enhancement patterns were relatively stable over time.Discussion
It is expected that
improved characterization of the aneurysm wall will provide insights into the
likelihood that a specific aneurysm might grow over time, and importantly
whether an aneurysm is at increased risk for rupture. The studies were acquired
with isotropic high spatial resolution (0.5mm) of 3D SPACE.
An understanding of intracranial
vessel wall response to the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents
is incomplete. There is a consensus opinion that this enhancement is likely
related to inflammatory status[1]. Yet the response is non-specific, and, in particular, vessels that are
apparently otherwise healthy can also show some degree of enhancement. Nevertheless,
there are reports that aneurysm wall enhancement might be strongly correlated
with rupture[2]. In this study, wall enhancement (score≥2) was
detected on 70% of the 35 unruptured aneurysms. This result differs from
previous reported studies. However, the wall enhancement was on average found
to cover less than 50% of the aneurysm wall area (average score: 2.34±1.16). As
these aneurysms were stable (no growth over time), further studies are needed
to identify the difference in wall enhancement degree between stable and
unstable aneurysms.
Our results indicated that
the walls of large aneurysms are better visualized than those of small ones. We
also find that there was greater wall enhancement in larger aneurysms. The
reason for improved vessel wall visibility in larger aneurysms may be that the
aneurysm wall thickness might increase as the aneurysm diameter increases[3]. We also divided patients
into three groups based on aneurysm location. Differences in visibility and enhancement
of the aneurysm wall did not reach statistical significance by location. However, this could be related to the small
number of aneurysms in each group. Besides, this might also reflect the
heterogeneity in wall thickness in these different locations.
Follow-up imaging should
be considered in patients with conservatively managed unruptured aneurysms to
evaluate aneurysm growth[4]. In our study, 4 of the 6 aneurysms that had different enhancement scores
at follow up showed changes of only one grade. Two showed changes of up to 2
grades, and of these one increased in enhancement over time while the other
decreased. Furthermore, only 1 of the 6 aneurysms that showed any enhancement change
were ≥7mm. Due to the small number of
aneurysms demonstrating any change in contrast enhancement, it remains unclear the
extent to which enhancement patterns are stable over time in asymptomatic,
stable aneurysms; however, our study suggests that if there are any changes
they are relatively small.
Conclusion
3D T1-weighted high resolution SPACE can be used to
evaluate vessel wall characteristics in intracranial aneurysms patients and assess
changes in enhancement at follow up studies. Imaging with SPACE following
contrast administration provides better aneurysm wall visibility and improves diagnostic confidence.Acknowledgements
we have nothing to disclouse.References
[1]
Hu P, Yang Q, Wang DD, Guan SC, Zhang HQ. Wall enhancement on high-resolution magnetic
resonance imaging may predict an unsteady state of an intracranial saccular
aneurysm. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:979-985.
[2]
Nagahata S,
NagahataM, ObaraM, et al. Wall enhancement ofthe intracranial aneurysms
revealed by magnetic resonance vesselwall imaging using three-dimensional turbo
spin-echo sequencewith motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium: a sign of ruptured
aneurysm? Clin Neuroradiol. 2016; 26(3): 277-283.
[3]
Song J, Park JE, Kim HR, Shin YS. Observation of cerebral aneurysm wall thickness using
intraoperative microscopy: clinical and morphological analysis of translucent
aneurysm. Neurol Sci. 2015;36:907-912. doi:
10.1007/s10072-015-2101-9.
[4]
Etminan N, Brown RD Jr, Beseoglu K, Juvela S, Raymond J, Morita A, et al. The unruptured intracranial aneurysm
treatment score: a multidisciplinary consensus. Neurology. 2015;85:881-889. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001891.