Blake E. Dewey1,2, Xiang Xu2,3, Linda Knutsson3,4, Amod Jog5, Jerry L. Prince1,3, Peter B. Barker2,3, Peter C. M. van Zijl2,3, and Paul Nyquist6
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Kirby Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 5Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 6Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
White matter hyperintensity (WMH) has been
associated with cognitive and motor decline. The condition is of presumed
vascular origin and may involve decreased blood brain barrier (BBB) integrity. A
double contrast injection scheme was used to access both dynamic contrast
enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-related
parameters in an asymptomatic population with high prevalence of WMH. The mean
transit time (MTT) was found to be significantly prolonged (5.87, p=0.002) in WMH
when compared to normal appearing white matter and that there was no
significant change in Ktrans (0.018, p=0.351) between the
lesions and the white/gray matter.
Purpose
White matter hyperintensity (WMH) of presumed
vascular origin associated with aging has been associated with later cognitive
and motor decline. The underlying pathophysiology is hypothesized to be
intermittent hypoperfusion secondary to changes of the small vessels due to the
effects of hypertension or other atherosclerotic risk factors. This decrease in
perfusion results in intermittent decreased oxygen delivery to the tissue. The
condition may also involve decreased blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. In
this study, we used a double MRI contrast injection scheme[1] to access both
dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion-related
parameters such as mean transit time (MTT), and the volume transfer coefficient
(Ktrans) to study an asymptomatic
population with high prevalence of WMH.Methods
This
pilot study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board. 21
participants (54.1 ± 3.5 years, 45% hypertensive) provided
informed consent and underwent 3T MRI (Philips Achieva) with a 32-channel head
coil. Images were acquired involving two separate bolus injections of
gadolinium (ProHance, Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy)[1]. Two structural images
were acquired before gadolinium injection: a 3D T1-weighted MPRAGE (1mm3 isotropic resolution,) and a 2D T2-weighted
FLAIR (0.98x0.93x3mm3 resolution). T1-mapping was also
performed before gadolinium using an inversion recovery Look-Locker sequence (2x2.2x4mm3).
Two doses of contrast agent were used in the study with dosage of 0.1mmol/kg
and 5cc/s injection rate. During the first contrast injection, DCE data were
acquired with a T1-weighted gradient echo sequence (FA =26°, TE =
2.5ms, TR = 5.1ms, 2x2.2x4mm3, 150 dynamics, 14 pre-contrast
baseline images). A post contrast MPRAGE image was then acquired using the
parameters mentioned above. After ~10 minutes from the first contrast
injection, a second dose of contrast agent was administrated and DSC imaging
was performed. (Single-shot gradient echo EPI, TE = 29ms, TR = 1500ms, 2x2x4mm3,
100 dynamics, 10 pre-contrast baseline images). After acquisition, structural
images were processed using a fully automated pipeline, BRAINMAP[2], which
performed image registration using the ANTs software package[3], skull removal using Multi-cONtrast
brain STRipping (MONSTR)[4], whole-brain grey/white matter segmentation using Multi-Atlas
Cortical Reconstruction Using Implicit Surface Evolution (MACRUISE)[5] and
lesion segmentation using Subject-Specific Sparse Dictionary Learning (S3DL)[6].
Automatically segmented lesion masks
were manually edited to remove false positives common to this process. T1-map,
DCE and DSC data were processed using Nordic-Ice (NordicNeuroLab, Norway)
including motion correction and semi-automatic selection of the arterial input
function (AIF). The baseline DSC and DCE images were averaged together and
rigidly registered to the MPRAGE image using ANTs. The perfusion parameter maps
were transformed using the registration transform and values extracted using segmentation masks for each
of the white matter (WM), grey matter (GM) and lesions (WML). All region masks
were eroded twice prior to extraction to avoid partial volume contamination
with normal tissue. The mean of each region was calculated and a Wilcoxon
rank-sum test was performed to determine statistical significance of region
differences.Results/Discussion
None
of the subjects showed any contrast enhancement on the post-contrast MPRAGE. After
processing, two subjects were excluded due to excess motion. Representative
images for the perfusion maps of one patient are presented in Figure 1. Figure
2 shows the results of segmentation and alignment from the same subject and the
same slice as presented in Figure 1. Notice that the MTT slices are interpolated to match the FLAIR resolution, but the underlying resolution remains 2x2x4mm. Overall, this cohort of subjects was heterogeneous
according to total lesion volume (mean: 2820mm3 ± 2609mm3). Figure 3 shows boxplots of
the mean values for each ROI for Ktrans (left) and MTT (right). MTT was
significantly prolonged in WML compared to normal appearing WM (p=0.002), suggesting
that these lesioned areas of the brain have associated vascular pathology. We
also see that there is a small but significant difference in MTT for the WM and
GM ROIs (p<0.0001), with values that are consistent with current literature[7].
This demonstrates confidence in the analysis methods. For Ktrans, we
found no significant difference between the WM and GM (p=0.07) or between WM
and WML (p=0.351). The uniformity suggests BBB integrity is not compromised in
the current cohort, but could also be due to the limited SNR of
DCE measurements or composite nature of Ktrans.Conclusion
In
this cohort of an asymptomatic
population with high prevalence of WMH,
we found that identified WML showed significant differences in MTT with no
significant difference in Ktrans. Further research will consider the
statistical modeling of patient data with respect to clinical data and the
addition of other disease courses to measure the contribution of vascular
pathology to overall disease course.Acknowledgements
The first two authors (B.E. Dewey and X. Xu) contributed equally to this work. This work was supported by Johns Hopkins Department of Anesthesia STaRR award.References
[1]
Essig, M., Shiroishi, M. S., Nguyen, T. B., Saake, M., Provenzale, J. M.,
Enterline, D., et al. (2013). Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked
technical questions. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 200(1),
24–34. http://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9543
[2]
Dewey et al. ECTRIMS Online Library. October 26, 2017
[3]
Avants, B. B., Tustison, N. J., Song, G., Cook, P. A., Klein, A., & Gee, J.
C. (2011). A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in
brain image registration. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2033–2044.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
[4]
Roy, S., Butman, J. A., Pham, D. L., Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging
Initiative. (2017). Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts
insensitive to pathology. Neuroimage, 146, 132–147.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.017
[5]
Huo, Y., Plassard, A. J., Carass, A., Resnick, S. M., Pham, D. L., Prince, J.
L., & Landman, B. A. (2016). Consistent cortical reconstruction and
multi-atlas brain segmentation. Neuroimage, 138, 197–210.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.030
[6]
Roy, S., He, Q., Sweeney, E., Carass, A., Reich, D. S., Prince, J. L., &
Pham, D. L. (2015). Subject-Specific Sparse Dictionary Learning for Atlas-Based
Brain MRI Segmentation. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics,
19(5), 1598–1609. http://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2439242
[7] Perkiö, J., Aronen, H. J., Kangasmäki, A., Liu, Y., Karonen, J., Savolainen, S., & Østergaard, L. (2002). Evaluation of four postprocessing methods for determination of cerebral blood volume and mean transit time by dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47(5), 973–981. http://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10126