Recent evidence suggests that the pubertal period corresponds with changes to white matter microstructure above and beyond age-related development. This study uses a longitudinal fixel-based analysis to investigate which regions of the brain correspond to changes in white matter fibre density and cross-section during pubertal development. We show that, over a 16-month follow-up period, increases in fibre density and cross-section are predominantly in the posterior white matter. These results add to evidence that white matter develops in a posterior-anterior fashion, and signifies the dynamic nature of brain development during puberty.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data were acquired for 60 typically developing children (27 female) on a 3.0 T Siemens Tim Trio (b=2800s/mm2, 60 directions, 2.4x2.4x2.4mm voxel size, TE/TR=110/3200ms, multi-band factor=3). Data were acquired at two time-points approximately 16 months apart: time1 (M = 10.4, SD = .41 years old), time2 (M = 11.7, SD = .47 years old). Children were classified peri-pubertal as 43% had physical signs of pubertal onset at time1, and 70% at time2.
DWI data were processed using MRtrix3 (v3.0rc1) using a recommended pipeline6. An unbiased longitudinal fibre orientation distribution (FOD) template was generated across the two time-points. Longitudinal permutation-based testing of FBA metrics was performed using connectivity-based fixel enhancement7 with a paired t-test design. Significant regions were identified at pFWE < .05.
Further post-hoc statistical testing of the corpus callosum was performed via segmentation into 10 subregions: the genu (G1, G2, G3); body (B1, B2, B3); isthmus (ISTH); and splenium (S1, S2, S3) as previously described8 (Fig 3a). The mean FD, FC and FDC value was computed for each callosal subregion.
We observed a statistically significant increase in FD over time (pFWE < .05; Fig 1a) localised to the mid and posterior corpus callosum, namely G1, B2, B3, ISTH, splenium and its bilateral projections (forceps major), as well as left anterior cingulum and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF). The strongest evidence for change was in forceps major and left SLF. Increases in FC (pFWE < .05; Fig 1b) were more widespread compared with that observed in FD (Fig 1b). Increases were localised to the full extent of the corpus callosum apart from G1 and G2, as well as bilateral projections of the callosal subregions, left cingulum, bilateral SLF and bilateral cortico-spinal tract (CST). Increases in FDC (pFWE < .05; Fig 1c-2) were localised to the full extent of the body, isthmus and splenium, left cingulum, bilateral SLF and CST.
Post-hoc analysis of the corpus callosum subregions revealed an upward translation of the FD, FC and FDC profiles with time (Fig 3b-d). Non-overlapping confidence intervals (indicating statistical significance at p < .01) were observed in the posterior body and anterior splenium, consistent with the whole-brain findings.
The current study is the first known application of FBA in a longitudinal experiment. The observed increases in fibre density and cross-section longitudinally might be reflected by increasing axonal diameter, or axon count, during the 16-month follow-up period. We have previously shown that pubertal children have greater FD in the posterior splenium compared with age-matched pre-pubertal children4 using the same group of children. Subsequently we hypothesised that longitudinal maturation of the white matter would persist anteriorly towards the midbody.
In line with our predictions, predominately the posterior white matter exhibited increased FD, FC and FDC longitudinally. Post-hoc analysis of the corpus callosum revealed that the most evidence for a difference over time was observed in the anterior splenium and body of the corpus callosum. Taken with our previous findings, this study adds to a growing body of evidence that white matter, at least in the corpus callosum, develops in a posterior-anterior fashion, and that pubertal onset and progression may contribute to this gradient.
We also observed increases in bilateral CST and SLF, consistent with previous studies that link pubertal progression with the development of these white matter pathways2,9. We were unable to fully model other factors such as sex and pubertal stage using the current statistical framework. Future work should explicitly investigate whether sex, and/or the rate of pubertal progression, affects fibre development above and beyond age-related development.
1. Yakovlev, P.I., Lecours, A.R., 1967. The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In: Minkowski, A (Ed.), Regional Development of the Brain Early in Life. Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc., Boston, pp. 3–70. Massachusetts.
2. Asato, M.R., et al., White Matter Development in Adolescence: A DTI Study. Cerebral Cortex, 2010. 20(9): p. 2122-2131.
3. Lebel, C., et al., Microstructural maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. NeuroImage, 2008. 40(3): p. 1044-1055.
4. Genc, S., et al., White matter alterations at pubertal onset. Neuroimage, 2017. 156: p. 286-292.
5. Herting, M.M., et al., Longitudinal changes in pubertal maturation and white matter microstructure. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2017. 81: p. 70-79.
6. Raffelt, D.A., et al., Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage, 2017. 144(Pt A): p. 58-73.
7. Raffelt, D.A., et al., Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: Whole-brain statistical analysis of diffusion MRI measures in the presence of crossing fibres. Neuroimage, 2015. 117: p. 40-55.
8. Genc, S., et al., Age, sex, and puberty related development of the corpus callosum: a multi-technique diffusion MRI study. bioRxiv 187724, 2017.
9. Pangelinan, M.M., et al., Puberty and testosterone shape the corticospinal tract during male adolescence. Brain Structure & Function, 2016. 221(2): p. 1083-1094.
10. Aboitiz, F., et al., Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res, 1992. 598(1-2): p. 143-53.