Vincent Kyu Lee1, Phillip Adams2, Benjamin Meyers1, Lauren Dennis3, Nancy Beluk1, Tracy Baust4, Lucas Saenz4, Yulia Domnina4,5, Joan Sanchez de Toledo4,5, Vincent J Schmithorst1, and Ashok Panigrahy1,6
1Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 2Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 3Science Technology and Mathematics, Regent University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 4Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 5Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 6Radiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Synopsis
Anesthetic neurotoxicity in infants with repetitive exposure
is a risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Dexmedetomidine
exposure is thought to have neuroprotective effects. We tested the hypothesis
that intraoperative volatile anesthetic exposure is predictive of aberrant
brain connectivity in the post-operative period in CHD infants, relative to dexmedetomidine
exposure using DTI and BOLD imaging.
Using both hypothesis driven and data driven approaches, as well as
graph analysis we showed that Increased volatile anesthetic exposure in the
intraoperative period is associated with reduced post-operative frontal brain
connectivity in CHD infants, while DEX exposure was associated with metrics of
improved brain connectivity.
INTRODUCTION:
The mechanism underlying anesthetic neurotoxicity in infants
with repetitive exposure is one of the most significant unanswered questions in
pediatric anesthesia despite recent FDA warning. Extensive animal data, including
primates suggest that apoptosis and aberrant brain connectivity likely
underlies poor neurocognitive outcomes. Significant epidemiologic human data
especially prolonged and/or repeated exposures early in life. Anesthetic/sedative
techniques have recently been described as risk factors for adverse
neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants undergoing cardiac surgery.1 Dexmedetomidine exposure is thought to have neuroprotective effects. We tested
the hypothesis that intraoperative volatile anesthetic exposure is predictive
of aberrant brain connectivity in the post-operative period in CHD infants,
relative to dexmedetomidine (DEX) exposure.METHODS:
A total of 85 term neonates with CHD were recruited prospectively
from the fetal period for pre-operative and post-operative imaging, with 44 of
the patients (PCA of 46 ± 5.6 weeks at scan) completing post-op MRI scans.
Participants were scanned on a Siemens 3T Skyra system using a 32-channel head
coil – each receiving a DTI with the following parameters: FOV = 256 mm, voxel
size = 2.0mm (isotropic), TE/TR=92ms/12600 ms, and 42-directions at B=1000s/ mm2.
DEX and anesthetic clinical factors, during the intra-op and
post-op periods, examined in this study are presented in Table 1 (Figure 1). Both
hypothesis and data-driven approaches were used to analyze the relationship between
intraoperative volatile anesthetic and intraoperative/postoperative DEX exposure and post-operative brain structural (DTI) and
functional (Resting BOLD) connectivity. As part of the hypothesis driven
analysis, manual tractography was performed using DSI studio2 for the
following tracts: genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum (CC); left
and right of cortico-spinal tract (CST), fronto-occipital fasciculus
(IFOF), inferior (ILF) and superior (SLF) longitudinal fasciculi. For data driven voxel-based analysis the DTI
were preprocessed for eddy current correction3 and computation of DTI metrics were performed using
routines in FSL.4 Spatial
normalization was performed using routines in SPM8.5 The L1 images were normalized to a neonatal template and
the FA images were normalized to the standard space using that transformation.
A study-specific template was constructed via averaging the FA images and then co-registering
to the neonatal white matter template. For
graph analysis, the study-specific template was back normalized to the
individual subject's native space and the neonatal parcellation atlas was
transformed into native space using that transformation. Graph metrics were
computed using routines in Brain Connectivity Toolbox (BCT)6 and IDL (Exelis Visual Information Solutions,
Boulder, Colorado). For global metrics, results were deemed significant at p
< 0.05; for nodal metrics, results were deemed significant at False
Discovery Rate (FDR) corrected q < 0.05. RESULTS:
In
the hypothesis driven manual tractography analysis, increased total volatile
anesthetic dose was associated with reduced structural connectivity involving
the FOF (p=0.0037) and the ILF (p=0.0098), with no effect on the CST, CC and SLF
(Figure 2). The data driven VBM diffusivity analysis showed that both the duration of
anesthetic and total dose of volatile anesthetic were predictive of increased
mean diffusivity (opposite of normal developmental change) in frontal lobe
regions that overlap with the FOF and ILF, while an opposite effect was noted
in relation to DEX (Figure 3).The data driven graph analysis of DTI
showed that both duration of anesthetic and total dose of volatile anesthetic
was predictive of reduced nodal efficiency in frontal lobe, while an opposite
effect was noted in relation to DEX (Figure 4). The data driven graph analysis
of resting BOLD showed that both duration of anesthetic and total dose of
volatile anesthetic was predictive of reduced brain connectivity (network
segregation) in frontal lobe, while an opposite effect was noted in relation to
DEX (Figure 5).DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION:
Increased volatile anesthetic exposure in the intraoperative
period is associated with reduced post-operative frontal brain connectivity in
CHD infants using multiple hypothesis-driven and data-driven analytical
approaches. In contrast, intraoperative
and postoperative DEX exposure was associated with metrics of improved brain
connectivity using the same analytical approach, suggesting in vivo evidence of
neuroprotection in CHD infants.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Ellen McCann, Mary, and
Sulpicio G Soriano. "General anesthetics in pediatric anesthesia:
influences on the developing brain." Current drug targets 13, no. 7 (2012): 944-951.
2. Yeh, Fang-Cheng, et al. "Deterministic diffusion
fiber tracking improved by quantitative anisotropy." (2013): e80713. PLoS
ONE 8(11): e80713. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080713
3. Jesper L. R. Andersson and Stamatios N. Sotiropoulos. An
integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject
movement in diffusion MR imaging. NeuroImage,
125:1063-1078, 2016.
4. Behrens, T. E. J., H. Johansen-Berg, M. W. Woolrich, S. M.
Smith, C. A. M. Wheeler-Kingshott, P. A. Boulby, G. J. Barker et al.
"Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex
using diffusion imaging." Nature neuroscience 6, no. 7 (2003): 750-757.
5. Friston, Karl J. "Statistical parametric
mapping." In Neuroscience databases, pp. 237-250. Springer US,
2003.
6. Rubinov, Mikail, and Olaf Sporns.
"Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and
interpretations." Neuroimage 52, no. 3 (2010): 1059-1069.