Chao Luo1,2, Guoxi Xie3, Jo Lee1,2, Xing Yang4, Xiaoliang Zhang5,6, Xin Liu1,2, and Ye Li1,2
1Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China, 2Shenzhen Key Laboratory for MRI, Shenzhen, China, 3School of Basic Science, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China, 4High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China, 5Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 6UCSF/UC Berkeley Joint Graduate Group in Bioengineering, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
Due to lack of dedicated fetal imaging RF coils, the system body
coil is often used to acquire fetal images. This setup is not optimized and
offers limited sensitivity and image quality. In this work, we designed and
manufactured a 22-channel flexible coil array for fetal examinations. Compared
with Siemens 6-channel body coil, the proposed fetal coil array achieves
significant improvements in imaging coverage, image SNR and parallel
acceleration capability.
Introduction
MRI is advantageous in fetal imaging due to its high soft-tissue
contrast, high resolution, and dynamic imaging capability., and has become an
important prenatal supplementary examination1. However, owing to lack of
dedicated fetal imaging RF coils, the system body coil is often used to acquire
fetal images. This setup is not optimized for the fetal applications and offers
limited sensitivity, parallel imaging capability2,3, and image quality. In this
work, we designed and manufactured a 22-channel flexible coil array for fetal
examinations. Compared with Siemens 6-channel body coil, the proposed fetal
coil array achieves significant improvements in imaging coverage, image SNR and
parallel acceleration capability.Methods
According to clinical requirements and
anatomical structure, the proposed 22-channel fetal coil was designed at 3T with
an overall size of 310×900mm2 and covered by the polyethylene
material. The proposed 22-channel fetal coil consisted of twenty-two elements,
as shown in Fig. 1. The width of the copper tape was 5 mm. The dimensions of
the loop 1, 5, 20, 22 were 110×160mm2, and loop 2, 6, 15, 18 were
110×150mm2;
and loop 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 17 were 110×126mm2, and the rest of loop were
120×126mm2.
All the loops were tuned to 123.2 MHz, corresponding to
the proton Larmor frequency at 3T. The
adjacent loops overlapped to minimize the coupling between loops and the
average S-parameter was approximately -15 dB or less.
The proposed 22-channel fetal coil array and
the Siemens 6-channel body coil array were tested on Siemens trio MRI 3T
scanner in phantom experiment firstly. The gradient echo (GRE) sequence with
the following parameters was used to acquire the phantom images of signal:
TR/TE /band width/flip angle = 300ms/10ms/130 Hz/pixel/60 degree, FOV/matrix/slice
thickness = 400×400mm2/256×256/3 mm. The commercial Siemens
6-channel body coil was used as a reference with the same protocol. The
covariance weighted root-sum-of-squares (Cov-rSoS) was employed to estimate the
image SNR of 22-channel fetal coil and 6-channel Siemens body coil with nine
elements of spine coils. Images are acquired in the transverse, sagittal and coronal
planes. The HASTE sequence with the following parameters was used to acquire the
fetal head images: TR/TE /band width/flip angle = 966ms/61ms /781 Hz/pixel /140
degree, FOV/matrix/slice thickness/slices/accelerate factor = 360×360mm2/256×165/3mm/31/2.
The TRUFI sequence with the following parameters was used to acquire the
fetal heart images4: TR/TE /band width/flip angle = 85.25ms/1.21ms/1502Hz/pixel/60
degree, FOV/matrix/slice thickness/slices/accelerate factor = 360×360mm2/208×208/4mm/1/4.
In all experiments, the proposed
22-channel fetal coil and the 9-channel spine coil were combined as the receive coil. Furthermore, a high
dielectric pad was placed between the back of pregnant woman and sickbed during
all the fetal imaging. Furthermore, a high dielectric pad was placed
between the back of pregnant woman and patient table during all the fetal imaging.Results
The Q-factors for unload/load were 127.2/11.8
which was measured with a network analyzer. The noise correlation matrix of
proposed 22-channel fetal coil and 6-channel Siemens body coil was measured
from noise images and shown in Fig 2. The maximal mutual coupling coefficient
is less than 0.46.
The coupling between the two set of the coil arrays is negligible according to
the noise correlation matrix. The SNR maps of transverse profile for the
proposed 22-channel fetal coil array and 6-channel body coil were demonstrated
in Figure 3. Compared with Siemens 6-channel body
coil, the mean of SNR at least increased by 11% in the center region of phantom. The average and maximum g-factors in the
black circle are listed below the 1/g-factor maps for comparison as shown in
Fig. 4. The fetal head and heart can be seen clearly from the fetal images
acquired with the proposed 22-channel fetal coil array as shown in Fig. 5.Discussion/Conclusion
The comparisons between the proposed
22-channel fetal coil array and a commercial Siemens 6-channel body coil were
performed in phantom experiments to validate the performance of the designed
22-channel fetal coil array. Based on the analysis of the phantom experiment,
the proposed 22-channel fetal coil array was superior to the Siemens 6-channel body
coil in term of SNR, longitudinal imaging coverage, penetration and parallel
performance. The fetus head and heart images were obtained with the proposed
22-channel fetal coil array in clinical examination, showing its potential of
the fetal coil array for the clinical diagnosis.Acknowledgements
This
work was supported in part by NSFC under Grant No. 61571433, 81527901, 81527901,
81327801 and 81627901. Guangdong Province grants 2014A030313691, 2015B020214006
and 2014B030301013. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS No. 2017415,
city grants KQJSCX20160301143250 and JCYJ20170413161314734 and a Pengcheng
Scholar Award.References
[1] Wielandner Alice, et al. Potential
of magnetic resonance for imaging the fetal heart. Seminars in Fetal and
Neonatal Medicine. Vol. 18. No. 5. WB Saunders, 2013. [2] Ye Li, et al.
Parallel MRI performance evaluation of a novel 32 channel fetal array at 1.5T,
20th ISMRM, 2012, 0568. [3] Keil B, Wald L L. Massively parallel MRI detector
arrays. Journal of magnetic resonance, 2013, 229: 75-89. [4] Yamashita,
Yasuyuki, et al. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. American journal
of roentgenology 168.2 (1997): 513-519.