Abhishek Lenka1, Apurva Shah2, Jitender Saini3, Pramod Kumar Pal1, and Madhura Ingalhalikar2
1Neurology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, India, 2Department of Electronics, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International University, Pune, India, 3Radiology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, India
Synopsis
Psychosis
manifested as formed visual hallucinations is one of the debilitating non-motor
symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), the patho-physiology of which remains
unclear. To gain insights into the neural correlates of psychosis in PD this
study analyzed the structural connectomic sub-networks of visual, executive and
memory circuits between patients with PD and psychosis (PD-P), PD without psychosis
(PD-NP) and controls (HC). When PD-P and HCs were compared, a global
connectivity deficit was observed in the visual and executive circuits and multiple connections within the visual network demonstrated significantly lower
connectivity in PD-P. Such changes were not observed in PD-NP vs. HCs.
Introduction
Psychosis is
one of the debilitating non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD)1. It is associated with higher health care
resource utilization and is an independent risk factor for higher mortality in
PD2. Psychosis in PD usually manifests as formed visual hallucinations and
minor hallucinations such as sense of presence and sense of passage. Although older age, greater disease severity
and stage, cognitive impairment, and long-term use of dopaminergic agents have
been regarded as risk factors for emergence of psychosis in PD, exact neural correlates
of psychosis in PD are yet to be
understood. Visuo-spatial, executive and memory dysfunction have been speculated
in PD patients with psychosis3, however there is no direct evidence of
alteration in the neural networks involved in these functions.This study therefore
aims at analyzing the integrity of the visual, memory and executive network in
PD patients with (PD-P) and without psychosis (PD-NP) and healthy controls (HC).Materials and methods
Diffusion MR images were obtained from 69
subjects (PD-P: 28, PD-NP:24, HC: 17, age and gender matched, MMSE > 24)
using a Philips Achieva® 3T MRI scanner
with a 32 channel head coil. The diffusion MRI data for each subject was
acquired using a single-shot spin-echo, echo-planar sequence with 15 diffusion
sensitive gradient directions with b-value = 1000 s/mm2and a b = 0
s/mm2 image, with a voxel size = 1.75 × 1.75 × 2 mm (without any intersection gap). High-resolution 3D T1 TFE images
were acquired with repetition time (TR) = 8.1 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.7 ms, flip
angle = 8°, sense factor = 3.5, field of view (FOV)
= 256 × 256 × 155 mm, voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm. For creating the structural
connectome (figure 1), cortical parcellation and sub-cortical segmentation was
obtained using Freesurfer4 on structural T1 images and a total of 86 regions
were extracted to represent the nodes of the structural network (68 cortical
regions and 18 subcortical structures). The quality of the parcellation was
manually checked for each subject and then transferred to the Diffusion MRI
space using an affine transform. To calculate the edges of the graph,
probabilistic fiber tracking5 was performed by seeding each node and then
computing the number of fibers that reached every other node. The edge strength
therefore indicates the number of fibers traveling between the two nodes6.
After performing tractography from each node we obtained an 86*86 connectome
for each subject which is a symmetric matrix with zero diagonal (no self
connections). Sub-networks associated with executive, visual and memory
functioning were then extracted based on the functional associations of the
brain regions in fMRI literature7. A topological and an edge-wise analysis were
carried out for each of the sub-networks using a MANCOVA model with age and
gender as co-variates. False discovery rates at p= 0.1 significance were
employed to account for multiple comparisons.Results
Significant
network deficits were observed in the visual network connections (r-lingual to r-entorhinal,
l-entorhinal to l-fusiform, l-lingual to r-lingual, l-cuneus to
l-lateraloccipital, r-inferiortempral to r-lateraloccipital) (figure 2) and
also at a visual network level with significantly lower global efficiency and
clustering coefficient (p-value < 0.002) (figure 3), as well as in the
executive network with lower modularity and higher characteristic path length (p-value< 0.005) when PD-P subjects were compared to
HCs. This significance was not observed in any of the pathways when PD-NP
subjects when compared to HCs other than significantly lower clustering
coefficient in the visual network in PD-NP. Between PD-P and PD-NP, no
significant difference was observed; however strong trends demonstrating lower
connection strength (uncorrected) in PD-P subjects was apparent.Discussion
We studied the structural integrity of three
networks i.e. visual, memory and executive network, alterations of which have
been implicated in the pathogenesis of psychosis in PD. The results demonstrate
loss of structural integrity in the visual circuit and global changes in the
visual and executive network of PD-P subjects when compared to the controls. We
did not observe any significant difference in the pattern of connectivity of
the two PD-subgroups; however strong trends demonstrating lower connection
strength in PD-P were noticeable. Future studies with larger sample size are
warranted to gain better insights into the role of these networks in PD-P
subjects. In summary, this study provided direct evidence of possible
involvement of visual and executive networks in the genesis of psychotic
symptoms in PD.Acknowledgements
We would like to thank CDAC BRAF for providing
their parallel computing facility and
DST-SERB for funding this project (ECR/2016/000808).
References
1. Schapira et al. Non-motor features of
Parkinson disease.Nat Rev Neurosci. (2017) Jul;18(7):435-450.
2. Frederick’s et al.; Parkinson’s disease and
Parkinson’s disease psychosis: a perspective on the challenges, treatments, and
economic burden. Am JManag Care (2017)
Apr;23(5 Suppl):S83-S92
3. Lenka
et al. : Psychosis in Parkinson's disease: From the soft signs to the hard
science; J NeurolSci.(2017)
Aug 15;379:169-176.
4.
Fischl B, et al.: Automatically Parcellating the Human Cerebral Cortex,
Cerebral Cortex. (2004)11(22).
5.
Behrens, Timothy EJ, et al. "Probabilistic diffusion
tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain?." Neuroimage
34.1 (2007): 144-155.
6. S.M.
Smith, M. Jenkinson, et. al. Advances in functional and structural MR image
analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage, (2004) 23(S1):208-19,
7. Power JD et al. Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron (2011)72,
665–678.