Pallab K Bhattacharyya1,2, Bhumi Bhusal3, Anna Crawford1, Thomas Masaryk1, and Mark J Lowe1
1Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clnic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
RF-induced heating of
an entirely insulated partially implanted conducting wire in a gel phantom was
measured at two different 3 tesla systems with a receive-only spine matrix
coil. Presence of inner spiral-wound stainless steel
helix in Arrow AK-05502 intrathecal catheters raises concern about possible
RF-induced heating during MRI. Temperature of the catheter was measured by
using fiber optic sensors with fluoroptic monitoring with the catheter inserted
into an ASTM gel phantom. Different
configurations representing in vivo
settings were tested at different E-fields in the phantom. No significant
heating was observed in any of the configurations.
Introduction
RF-induced heating of an entirely insulated partially implanted
conducting wire in a gel phantom was measured at two different 3 tesla systems
with a receive-only spine matrix coil. An Arrow AK-05502 intrathecal catheter
(Teleflex, Morrisville, NC), used as sturdy subarachnoid cerebrospinal
fluid drains placed for prophylaxis against spinal cord ischemia during aortic
aneurysm repair and having inner spiral-wound stainless helix, was used as
insulated conducting wire. Temperature changes during routine lumbar spine scans
at different points corresponding to different electric (E) fields along the
catheter located were measured in this study.Methods
MR scans were performed using 3T Siemens whole
body Prisma and Skyra scanners (Erlangen, Germany) with a receive-only spine
matrix coil. The 89 cm long catheter was inserted from the back of a
polyacrylic gel filled phantom,1 and was guided
into the phantom (Fig. 1) closely
matching the path followed in human. Inside the phantom, the length traversed
along the Z axis (SI direction) was varied between 15 and 21 cm, and the depth
from the back/posterior side (AP direction) of the phantom was varied between
4.5 and 6.5 cm. These variations represented different lengths of the catheter
inside and outside the dielectric medium, and were made to closely mimic
possible scenarios during a human scan. The catheter was run parallel to the Z-axis
outside the phantom, as would be in vivo.
Two fluoroptic temperature sensors (model m3300, LumaSense Technologies, Santa
Clara, CA, USA) were used for temperature measurement. The points of contact of
the probes were the insulating tube surrounding the wire (i) close to the tip, at
the distal end of the catheter, and (ii) either at a point on the catheter far
away from the tip (proximal) or dangling in the gel as a reference. The E-field
distribution in the body transmit coil with the gel as dielectric media was
simulated (Fig. 2(a)) using commercial
software (XFdtd 7.4; Remcom Inc., State College, PA, USA) to solve Maxwell’s
equations using the finite-difference time-domain method.2 The RF transmit
coil was modeled as a 16-rung high-pass quadrature birdcage coil with a radius
of 35.5 cm and a length of 71 cm. The
properties of the dielectric medium in the simulation were as follows:
dielectric constant = 79 and electrical conductivity = 0.47 S/m. These values
are close to the properties of tissues represented by the gel phantom. The
points of thermal probe contact on the catheter corresponded to E-fields in the
range of ~7-21 V/m, which was smaller than that obtained with simulation of 2
mm Varipose man human model (Fig. 2(b)), ensuring smaller temperature (varies
as E2) rise during in vivo
scanning. A routine lumbar MRI protocol consisting of the
following scans was performed: (i) localizer, (ii) sagittal and coronal
Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-shot Turbo spin-Echo (HASTE) localizer
(TR/TE/FA=1080ms/97ms/1800, turbo factor (tf)=256), (iii) sagittal
T2 weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) (TR/TE/FA=3860ms/85ms/1600, tf=17),
(iv) sagittal T1 weighted TSE (TR/TE/FA=600ms/10ms/1600, tf=3), (v)
sagittal Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) (TR/TE/TI/FA=7000ms/83ms/180ms/1200,
tf=11) and (vi) sagittal T2 weighted TSE (TR/TE/FA=4000ms/108ms/1600,
tf=21) (only Prisma scan parameters are listed here). All scans were run only
for the combination of 17 cm inside length along Z axis and 5.5 cm distance
from the back setting (17/5.5), and then the highest SAR sequence, HASTE, was
performed with other length combinations. Results and Discussion
For
the sake of brevity only data acquired at the Prisma scanner are presented
here. Specific absorption rate (SAR) values recorded for each scan from the
console are shown in Table 1. Temperature recordings during all scans with the
17/5.5 setting (described above) did not show any significant (>2oC)
heating (Fig. 3). No significant temperature change was observed when the
highest SAR sequence (HASTE) was run with the other combination of lengths
along Z axis and distance from the back of the phantom (Fig. 4).Testing
different combinations of wire lengths inside the phantom at both Prisma and
Skyra ensured measurements relevant to safety of patients of different sizes.
This testing opens up opportunity for use of this sturdier and conditionally MR
safe catheter for subarachnoid draining and post-operative spine MRI. These
results do not necessarily generalize and individual centers should perform
experiments or simulations to validate safety of performing MR scans in the
presence of any such partially implanted insulated conducting wires.Conclusion
Partially implanted fully insulated conducting
wires such as Arrow AK-05502 intrathecal catheters do not heat up during spine
MRI at 3T Prisma and Skyra scanners with a receive-only spine matrix coil. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Baker KB, Tkach JA, Phillips
MD, Rezai AR. Variability in RF-induced heating of a deep brain stimulation
implant across MR systems. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 2006;24(6):1236-1242.
2. Taflove
A, Hagness SC. Computational
electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method. Norwood, MA:
Artech Hhouse; 2005.