Darryl B Sneag1, Jacqui C Zhu1, Susan Lee1, Tina Jeon1, Bin Lin1, and Maggie M Fung2
1Radiology, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States, 2Applications & Workflow, GE Healthcare, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
This
study’s purpose was to compare non-respiratory and respiratory- triggered proton
density and T2-weighted DIXON fat suppression sequences for high-resolution brachial
plexus MRI. In a cohort of 5 volunteers and 20 patients, we were able to
demonstrate that respiratory triggering substantially reduced ghosting artifact
and improved delineation of nerve fascicular architecture with acceptable increased
scan time.
Purpose
Oblique
sagittal high resolution MRI sequences, orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of
the brachial plexus, can reliably depict morphologic and signal abnormalities. However,
this acquisition technique can be challenging due to respiratory-induced
ghosting artifact that may obscure nerve detail. More than two decades ago, Posniak
et al. mentioned the possible use of respiratory triggering (RT) for plexus
MRI1. However, the efficacy of RT for brachial plexus imaging has
not yet been reported. Our hypothesis was that RT would minimize ghosting
artifact and improve nerve conspicuity of the brachial plexus, without prohibitive
scan time penalty. Methods
In
this prospective, IRB-approved study of 5 healthy volunteers and 20 patients, proton
density (PD) or T2-weighted Dixon fat suppressed (DFS) sequences with and
without RT (with the same scan coverage and comparable spatial resolution –
Table 1), were acquired consecutively within each examination. The study was
performed on three 3T 60cm bore scanners (Discovery MR750, GE Healthcare, USA)
using 16 channel small and/or medium flexible coils. RT was achieved prospectively
with a thoracic bellow, 1-2 respiratory rate (RR) intervals, trigger window = 40%,
and trigger point = 30%.
Two
musculoskeletal radiologists, blinded to the presence of RT, scored the sequences
independently. To optimize blinding, the non-RT and RT acquisitions of
different subjects were submitted for scoring in a random fashion. Subjective
scoring criteria for A) Ghosting artifact; B) Nerve conspicuity (defined as delineation
of nerve fascicular architecture) for three regions of the brachial plexus
(supraclavicular, retroclavicular and infraclavicular); and C) Overall
diagnostic confidence were employed (Table 2). The total image quality score
was computed by summing the scores of the three regions of B. RR, total scan
time and number of slices were recorded, with average scan time per slice
calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare non-RT
and RT parameters. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using weighted Cohen’s
kappa analysis with the exception of total image quality score, which were evaluated
with Krippendorf’s alpha analysis. Spearman
correlation evaluated the associations of image quality with scan time and RR,
where good image quality defined by
nerve conspicuity score ≥3 (Scale 1- 4, Table 2). Significance was set a priori
to p<0.05. Results
In 25 subjects, 50 sequences were compared (4 PD, 12 3-pt.
DFS, 34 2-pt. DFS). Figure 1 shows the subjective scoring comparison results.
RT demonstrated improvements in all image quality catergories with statistical
significance (p<0.05). The diagnostic confidence increased for both readers
from a median score of 2 to 3 ( p = 0.02 for reader 1 and p = 0.04 for reader
2). Inter-observer agreement for asessment of ghosting artifact showed substantial
to almost perfect agreement (kappa coefficents: 0.81 for non-RT and 0.77 for RT). Evaluation of nerve conspicuity demonstrated
almost perfect agreement (Krippendorff's alpha coefficients: 0.986 for non-RT
and 0.985 for RT). Inter-observer agreement of the remaining scores
demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement (kappa coefficient ranging from:
0.41-0.79). There was no evidence of
association between scan time with good image quality on non-RT or RT sequences
(Spearman’s ρ ranging from: -0.35 to 0.29 and -0.04 to 0.29 respectively).
There was a consistent weakly positive correlation between higher respiratory
rate and good image quality (Spearman’s
ρ ranging from: 0.28-0.43). Median scan time per slice increased from 6.95 sec (non-RT)
to 10.21 sec (RT) (46% increase) and total median scan time increased from 4:44
min. (non-RT) to 6:00 min. (RT) (36% increase). Discussion
This study
demonstrated that for brachial plexus MRI, RT can reduce ghosting artifact,
improve nerve fascicular architecture delineation and increase overall
diagnostic confidence, with acceptable scan time cost and very good
inter-observer agreement. There was a consistent weak association between higher
respiratory rate and better image quality. A lower respiratory rate was
challenging for RT scans as all slices in a respiratory cycle are acquired in a
single TR, thereby contributing to a relatively long non-data filling period.
An additional challenge we subjectively observed with respiratory triggering was
an irregular respiratory rhythm, which occasionally precipitated imperfect triggering.
RT techniques that better incorporate RR and respiratory rhythm may further minimize
scan time and improve image quality. Conclusion
Given the
acceptable scan time impact observed in this study, use of RT could be
considered for high resolution brachial plexus MRI to minimize artifact and
improve image quality. Alternative techniques, such as soft gating3,4 or guided
breathing that are insensitive to respiratory patterns may be further
investigated to mitigate artifact.Acknowledgements
Hospital of Special Surgery has an institutional agreement with GE HealthcareReferences
[1] Posniak, H et al.
MR Imaging of the Brachial Plexus. American Journal of Radiology 1993: 161;
373-379.
[2] Cheng JY, et al. JMRI 2014, [3] Lai, ISMRM, 2017