1425

MR based changes in normal ACL hamstring graft over two years following reconstruction
Fan Xiao1, Jacky Ka Long Ko1, Alex Wing Hung Ng1, Jason Chi Shun Leung2, David Ka Wai Yeung1, Patrick, Shu Hang Yung3, and James Griffith1

1Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 3Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Synopsis

This study investigates that normal changes seen on MRI of the ACL graft over first two years after reconstruction. The graft and perigraft tissues were assessed on serial MRI examinations addressing features such as graft size, signal intensity and perfusion. MR changes were compatible with the histological process known as changes in the ACL graft, usually called ‘ligamentization of the graft’ seems to have stabilized by 24 months.

INTRODUCTION

Over half a million ACL graft reconstructions are undertaken worldwide each year. Yet little imaging data exists on the normal development of the graft. This study documents serial changes in the normal ACL graft during the first 24 months following graft reconstruction.

METHODS

Nine patients (6 males, 3 females, age: 26 ± 13 years) underwent serial MRI examination at 1 (baseline), 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after hamstring graft reconstruction surgery. MR technique: 3T whole-body scanner: proton-density (PD) sagittal, fat-saturated (FS) PD coronal, PD oblique axial along the ACL, FS PD sagittal, post contrast FS T1-weighted oblique axial and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.

Image analysis: Graft signal intensity on PD sequences was compared to that of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Graft cross-sectional area and perigraft reactive tissue were measured on post-contrast oblique axial images. DCE-derived time-intensity curves yielded maximum enhancement (Emax) and enhancement slope (Eslope) of the graft and perigraft reactive tissue.

RESULTS

At baseline, the graft was of uniformly lower signal intensity compared to posterior cruciate ligament (0.76 ± 0.16). Thereafter, relative graft signal intensity almost doubled and was maximum at 3 months. Afterwards, the graft signal intensity reduced progressively to 24 months, to just baseline ratio.

Average graft cross-sectional area (CSA) at baseline was 36.4 ± 3.5 mm2, increasing by 27% to 45.2±3.7 mm2 at 3 months, and thereafter slowly returning to below baseline caliber being 28.7±4.0 mm2 at 24 months.

Average perigraft reactive tissue cross-sectional area at baseline was 123.3±9.6 mm2, increasing by 30% to 166.5±10.0 mm2 at 3 months, and thereafter slowly reducing to 32.0±10.9 mm2 at 24 months only.

Mild graft enhancement has evident at baseline, was greatest at 3 months and then decreased to below baseline levels at 24 months. Up until 9 months after graft reconstruction, the outer half of the graft enhanced more than the inner half of the graft. After that, both the outer and inner halfs of the graft showed a decreasing perfusion trend with the inner half showing slightly higher perfusion parameters than the outer half. Perigraft enhancement was most avid at baseline and thereafter progressively decreased up to 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Changes in the ACL graft, referred to histologically as ‘ligamentization of the ACL graft’ can be clearly depicted on MR imaging of the graft. Graft size, perigraft tissue thickening, graft signal intensity and perfusion were all maximal at 3 months and thereafter slowly reduced up to 24 months. This is compatible with stabilization of the ligamentization process by 24 months.

Acknowledgements

NA

References

NA
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26 (2018)
1425