Saya Horiuchi1, Hon J. Yu1, Alex Luk1, Adam Rudd1, Jimmy Ton1, Edward Kuoy1, Jeff Russell2, Kelli Sharp3, and Hiroshi Yoshioka1
1Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, 2Science and Health in Artistic Performance, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States, 3Department of Dance, The Claire Trevor School of the Arts, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
Synopsis
This study demonstrated T2
and T1rho profiles of talar dome and tibial plafond cartilage from male and
female ballet dancers using angular-segmentation methodology for quantitative assessment
of cartilage in vivo. The results in this study showed both T2 and T1rho
relaxation time indicated the lowest value over the central weight-bearing
portion, while they indicated relatively higher values in the anterior and
posterior portion. These findings can be due to the combination of the magic
angle effect which has higher influence on T2 value and early cartilage
degenerative changes which are more sharply detected by T1rho value.
Purpose
Many
dancers begin their training long before skeletal maturity for years, which can
lead to ankle arthritis in experienced dancers. Accurate and non-invasive
assessment of early cartilage disease is important for young dancers. The
purpose of this study was to demonstrate T2 and T1rho profiles and values of
talar dome and tibial plafond cartilage in male and female ballet dancers, and
compare them using an angle-dependent mapping approach for quantitative assessment
of cartilage in vivo.Materials and Methods
The study
protocol was approved by the institutional review board, and all subjects gave
written informed consent. Ten healthy female dancers (mean: 21.7 years old,
range: 19-30) and 9 male dancers (mean: 23.1 years old, range: 18-40) were
enrolled. Equal numbers of left and right ankles were scanned in the female
group. Four right ankles and five left ankles were scanned in the male group.
One left ankle of a male dancer was excluded because of incorrect angular
position. All MR studies were performed on a 3T scanner (Achieva, Philips
Healthcare, Netherlands) using an 8-channel, dedicated ankle/foot coil. Three
sagittal images were acquired including fat suppressed (FS) proton
density-weighted imaging (PDWI), T2 mapping, and T1rho mapping with true
sagittal angulation parallel to the magnetic static field (B0). The acquisition
parameters were as follows. FS PDWI: 2D turbo spin-echo; repetition time
(TR)/echo time (TE)= 3958/30 ms, number of excitation (NEX)=1, and total
acquisition time=2.5 minutes. T2 mapping: 2D turbo spin-echo; TR/TE=3000/13,
26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91 ms, NEX=1 and total acquisition time=11 minutes. T1rho:
3D FS PROSET (PRinciple Of Selective Excitation Technique); TR/TE=7.5/3.8 ms,
flip angle=10°, NEX=1, spin-lock frequency=575 Hz, time of spin-lock (TSL)= 0,
10, 20, 40, and 80 ms, and acquisition time=3 minutes 51 seconds for each TSL.
All images were obtained with field of view (FOV)=140x140mm, slice
thickness/gap=3/0 mm, image matrix=512×512, and number of slices=20. Manual
cartilage segmentation of the talar and tibial cartilage on T2 and T1rho images
was performed by a radiologist using MIPAV software (http://mipav.cit.nih.gov).
T2 and T1rho angle-dependent profiles of the talar and tibial cartilage were created
from the five-middle segmented-slices in each ankle by angular segmentation in
steps of 4-degrees over the length of the segmented cartilage1,2 with
the angle 0 defined along B0 as shown in Figure 1. Mean thickness and volume of
the talar and tibial cartilage were estimated using the five-middle
segmented-slices and the entire segmented-slices, respectively. The angular T2
and T1rho profiles were compared between male and female dancers using the
first, third, and fifth slices of five segmented-slices defined as medial,
middle, and lateral slice, respectively. Both angular segmentation and profile generation
were performed using a custom program prepared in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick,
USA).Results
Mean thickness
and volume of the talar and tibial cartilage were shown in Table 1. T1rho demonstrated
thicker cartilage and larger cartilage volume measurements in comparison to
those of T2 for both male and female dancers because deep cartilage was dark
similar to the subchondral bone plate on T2 mapping leading to underestimation.
Male dancers showed thicker cartilage and larger cartilage volume than female
dancers. The angular T2 and T1rho profiles in the middle slice were shown in
Figure 2. Average T2 and T1rho value in posterior 1/2 magic angle (150-154°), B0
direction (178-182°), anterior 1/2 magic angle (206-210°) and anterior magic
angle (234-238°) were evaluated in Table 2. There were no significant
differences in both T2 and T1rho profiles between female and male dancers.
Tibial cartilage tended to yield lower T2 and T1rho values than talar cartilage.
Both talar and tibial cartilages demonstrated angular-dependent T2 and T1rho
profiles. T2 and T1rho values of talar and tibial cartilage indicated the lowest
values from the angular range of approximately 180°±20°, which corresponded to
the central weight-bearing portion of talar dome and tibial plafond. T2 and
T1rho values of talar and tibial cartilage tended to be higher at closer angle
to the magic angle.Conclusion
This study
demonstrated an angular-dependent T2 and T1rho profiles and values of talar and
tibial cartilage in female and male ballet dancers. T2 value was shown to be more
largely influenced by magic angle effect, while T1rho was less prone to be influenced
by it2,3. On the other hand, T1rho value was shown to be more
sensitive to early cartilage degeneration than T2 value4. Therefore,
increased T2 and T1rho values over the anterior and posterior portion of the talar
dome and tibial plafond in dancers can be due to the combination of the magic
angle effect and early cartilage degeneration.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Yu HJ, Luk A,
Ton J, et al. Comparison of T2 and T1r mapping of the ankle cartilage between
young healthy females and dancers. 26 April, 2017, 25th Annual Meeting &
Exhibition (ISMRM), Honolulu. (#5106)
2. Nozaki T,
Kaneko Y, Yu HJ, et al. Comparison of T1rho imaging between spoiled gradient
echo (SPGR) and balanced steady state free precession (b-FFE) sequence of knee
cartilage at 3 T MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1299-1305.
3. Kaneko Y,
Nozaki T, Yu HJ, et al. Normal T2 Map Profile of the Entire Femoral Cartilage
Using an Angle/Layer-Dependent Approach. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:1507-1516
4. Choi JA, Gold
GE. MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am.
2011;19:249-282.