Chu-Yu Lee1, In-Young Choi1,2,3, and Phil Lee1,3
1Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States, 2Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States, 3Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
Synopsis
Data acquisition for MRS and MRSI requires a stable scanner
frequency during the relatively long scan time. However, gradient heating and
subject motion during the scan result in drifts of the scanner frequency. The
effects of frequency drifts include reduced SNR, broad linewidth, and errors in
spatial encoding and metabolite quantification. We had recently
proposed a new navigator approach: outer volume suppression (OVS)-localized
navigator, to prospectively correct frequency drifts without introducing SNR
losses, overcoming the shortcomings of previous PRESS-localized navigator. The purpose of this study is to validate the OVS-localized navigator approach
through the comparison with non-localized navigator and the
quantitative evaluations of spectral quality and metabolite concentrations in
10 healthy subjects.
INTRODUCTION
Data acquisition for MRS and MRSI requires a stable scanner
frequency during the relatively long scan time. However, gradient heating and
subject motion during the scan result in drifts of the scanner frequency. The
effects of frequency drifts include reduced SNR, broad linewidth, and errors in
spatial encoding and metabolite quantification. 1-12 We had recently
proposed a new navigator approach: outer volume suppression (OVS)-localized
navigator, 13 to prospectively correct frequency drifts without
introducing SNR losses, overcoming the shortcomings of previous PRESS-localized
navigator. 5,10 The purpose of this study is to validate the
OVS-localized navigator approach through the comparison with non-localized
navigator 2,6,11 and the quantitative evaluations of spectral quality
and metabolite concentrations in 10 healthy subjects.METHODS
All
the experiments were performed on a Skyra 3T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen,
Germany). In the first experiment, frequency tracking accuracy of OVS-localized
navigator was compared to that of non-localized navigator with a 1° flip angle.
For the comparison, these two navigators were integrated into a single-voxel
MRS sequence. Un-suppressed water signals were acquired with the navigator
signals. Frequency drifts detected by the navigators were compared to those
measured by the un-suppressed water signals (Fig. 1). The frequency tracking accuracies
were compared through MRS measurements on a phantom with gradient
heating-induced frequency drifts by a preceding 30-min DWI experiment. The
frequency tracking accuracies were also compared through MRS measurements on a
healthy subject, who was instructed to rotate around 10° around the sagittal
axis periodically during data acquisition. In the second experiment, in vivo spectral
quality and metabolite concentrations were assessed with and without the
frequency correction in 10 healthy subjects. Three 2-D MRSI scans were
performed on each subject, including one MRSI scan before a 30-min DWI
experiment without frequency corrections and the other two MRSI scans after the
DWI experiment with and without the frequency correction. MRSI data were
acquired using a semi-LASER sequence 14 (TE/TR = 35/1600 ms, FOV = 20×20 cm2, slice thickness = 2
cm, VOI = 8×8 cm2, and 16×16 phase encoding). OVS-localized
navigator was acquired in all MRSI scans to monitor frequency drifts. Spectral
quality and metabolite concentrations were quantified using LCModel, 15
and were compared between MRSI scans.RESULTS
Both OVS-localized navigator and non-localized navigator
equally tracked the gradient heating-induced frequency drifts (RMSE = 0.1 Hz
vs. 0.1 Hz) (Fig. 1a). However, in the presence of motion-induced frequency
drifts (Fig. 1b), only OVS-localized navigator tracked the frequency drifts
(RMSE = 0.5 Hz vs. 4.4 Hz). In MRSI experiments on humans (N = 10), frequency drifts were increased from 0.6 ± 0.3 Hz/min to 5.1 ± 0.3 Hz by the
DWI experiment-induced gradient heating. The increased frequency drifts
resulted in significantly increased linewidth from 5.6 ± 0.6 Hz to 12.0 ± 1.1 Hz.
The frequency drifts also resulted in increased biases of creatine and
myo-inositol concentrations, and increased CRLB of NAA, choline, myo-inositol,
and glutamate+glutamine of the spectra (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2 and Table 1). With
the frequency correction, frequency drifts were reduced to 0.1 ± 0.1 Hz/min.
The linewidth of the spectra was reduced to 5.4 ± 0.5 Hz. Metabolite concentrations and
CRLB showed no significant differences compared with those before the DWI
experiment (Fig. 2 and Table 1).DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated that OVS-localized navigator could
prospectively correct both gradient heating- and motion-induced frequency
drifts. In particular, corrections for motion-induced frequency drifts required
a VOI-localized navigator due to changes of spatial distribution of B0
inhomogeneity. However, OVS-localized navigator could only partially restore
the spectral quality due to other effects of motion including changes of B0
inhomogeneity and positions. Additional adjustments are necessary to fully
restore spectral quality through prospective motion correction and shim update.
16,17 This study also demonstrated that the degraded spectral
quality and unreliable metabolite quantifications resulting from frequency
drifts can be restored using OVS-localized navigator. The improved spectral
linewidth might contribute to the significantly reduced biases and
uncertainties in metabolite quantification. While we expected an improvement
of the SNR with the frequency correction over that without correction, we did
not observe such effect in the SNR obtained from LCModel. This discrepancy
could be due to inaccurate basis sets in conjunction with distorted broad line
shapes that could artificially reduce LCModel fit residuals. 15 In
conclusion, OVS-localized navigator could provide an effective prospective
frequency correction for enhanced in vivo spectral quality and accurate
metabolite quantification without SNR losses.Acknowledgements
This study was
partly supported by NIH (UL1TR000001, P20GM103418). The Hoglund Brain Imaging Center is
supported by the NIH (S10RR029577) and the Hoglund Family Foundation.References
[1]. Foerster et al., MRM (54), 1261-7, 2005.
[2] Henry et al., MRM (42), 636-42, 1999.
[3]. Schmidt et al., MAGMA (10), 167-70, 2000.
[4]. Helms et al., MRM (46), 395-400, 2001.
[5]. Thiel et al., MRM (47), 1077-82, 2002.
[6]. Ebel et al., MRM (53), 465-9, 2005.
[7]. Zaitsev et al., NMR Biomed (23), 325-32, 2010.
[8]. Keating et al., MRM (64), 672-79, 2010
[9]. Ernst et al., MRM (65), 13-7, 2011.
[10]. Lange et al., JMRI (33), 748-54, 2011
[11]. Tal et al., MRM (70), 895-904, 2013.
[12]. Near et al., MRM (73), 44-50, 2015.
[13]. Lee et al., ISMRM, 5526, 2017.
[14]. Scheenen et al., MRM (59), 1-6, 2008.
[15]. Provencher, NMR Biomed (14), 260-64, 2001.
[16]. Hess et al., NMR Biomed (25), 347-58, 2012.
[17]. Bogner et al., Neuroimage (88), 22-31, 2014.