Sonia I. Goncalves1 and Noam Shemesh1
1Neuroplasticity and Neural Activity Lab, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
Synopsis
MRS is a versatile technique that allows for the
non-invasive in-vivo exploration of tissue metabolism. In most MRS pulse
sequences based on broadband excitation, the acquisition is preceded by water
saturation pulses that suppress the water bulk signal and implicitly also
exchangeable protons downfield of water. We introduce a new method for short-TE
downfield MRS and show that it detects multiple peaks in-vivo that extend
beyond 9 ppm.
Purpose
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a
versatile technique that allows for the non-invasive in-vivo exploration of
tissue metabolism. Most MRS pulse sequences rely on broadband excitation and water
saturation. Although the water bulk signal is suppressed such that
millimolar-level metabolites can be observed, the spontaneous exchange between
saturated water and labile protons, resonating downfield of the water peak,
deems the latter virtually unobservable in conventional water-suppressed
techniques. Downfield spectroscopy has been achieved using high dynamic range
MRS [1-4]. Relaxation-Enhanced MRS [5, 6] (RE-MRS) has been proposed as an
alternative technique for downfield spectroscopy. RE-MRS employs
frequency-selective excitation targeting resonances of interest, while avoiding
the excitation of bulk water. Although RE-MRS outperformed other methods [1] in
revealing downfield resonances, the sequences involved very long echo times (>40
ms); since downfield resonances are nearly invariably broad, the long TE may
reduce the sensitivity to detect low-concentration metabolites. Here, we
introduce a new method for downfield spectroscopy that combines RE-MRS
principles and Image-Selective-In-Vivo-Spectroscopy ISIS [8] localization, abbreviated iRE-MRS. We obtain TEs
as low as 13 ms at 9.4 T and as low as 7.5 ms at 16.4 T, validate our method in
phantoms, and show that, even at this lower field strength, multiple new downfield
resonances can be detected in-vivo.Methods
Figure 1 illustrates the proposed sequence for
one ISIS cycle. The localization module is followed by acquisition: a 90ºx-180ºy
spin-echo pulse combination. The 180º refocusing pulse is surrounded by spoiler
gradients along the three physical axis. The pulses used to acquire phantom data
were generated by the shape algorithm implemented in Paravision 6.0.1. For
in-vivo experiments, RF pulses were designed using the Shinar LeRoux algorithm
[9]. The downfield metabolites were excited using an 8 ms equiripple
single-band pulse with a 4 ppm bandwidth whereas for upfield excitation an 8 ms
equiripple single-band 3 ppm bandwidth pulse was used. A 4 ms equiripple refocusing
pulse was designed with 4 or 3 ppm bandwidth for downfield and upfield spectral
regions, resepectively. Phantom validations were performed using a 10 mm NMR
tube filled with Fluorinert and containing three 3 mm tubes with a 100 mM
solution (in PBS) of Glutamate, NAA and GABA, on a 16.4T vertical scanner
equipped with a micro5 probe. In-vivo experiments were carried out on 6
Long-Evans male rats weighting 250 g and aged ~3 months on a 9.4T horizontal
bore scanner (Bruker-Biospin, Billerica, MA). For all experiments, reference
spectra were acquired with a PRESS sequence placed on identical voxels and with
identical TEs/TRs. All spectra were preprocessed by first applying zero filling
(32k) to the averaged time-domain signal, apodization with a 10 Hz factor.Results
Figure 2 shows representative spectra obtained
in the tube containing NAA. The excitation was centered at 0.4 ppm and ranged
from -2.6 to 3.4 ppm. The comparison of both spectra shows that iRE-MRS correctly
reproduces the gold-standard PRESS spectrum for frequencies falling within the RF
pulses’ passband. Figure 3 shows representative downfield spectra for three
representative animals.. In addition to the observation of the NAA peak at ~7.85 ppm, other peaks
at ~6.4, 6.8 and 8.3 ppm
are clearly visible. To investigate whether the iRE-MRS offers benefits over RE-MRS
the echo times were gradually increased (Figure 4). Clearly, longer echo times
dramatically decrease the sensitivity in peak detection. Figure 5 shows the
spectra obtained for one animal, when the excitation was centred at 10 ppm and
ranged from 8 to 12 ppm. To our knowledge, peaks at this region have never been
reported, but iRE-MRS shows several peaks beyond 9.5 ppm which to this point
remain unidentified.Discussion
Downfield MRS can significantly benefit from TE
reductions, which have here been achieved with a new pulse sequence based on
ISIS and RE-MRS (iRE-MRS). Compared to previous work [1-4], iRE-MRS avoids
broadband excitation therefore precluding the use of water suppression pulses
or the necessity of using e.g. calibration factors to exclude the water peak [2].
Apart from the increased sensitivity, iRE-MRS reveals multiple peaks that extend beyond 9 ppm,
which afford an exciting new vista for characterizing more metabolites in the
brain than currently possible. Some of these signals are likely carboxylic acid
or nucleotide/nucleoside signals resonating around these frequencies.Conclusion
We demonstrate that short-TE iRE-MRS provides spectra that are able to
unravel multiple metabolite resonances, even beyond 9ppm, in-vivo at 9.4T. The
application of short echo time iRE- MRS at higher field strengths has the
potential to open-up new directions in the investigation of in-vivo downfield
resonances.Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Jean-Nicolas Dumez for
assistance with the SLR algorithm. This study was funded by the European
Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Starting Grant,
agreement No. 679058).References
[1] Piotto et al., J.
Biomol. NMR, 2, 661-665, 1992; [2] Dreher and Leibfritz, Magn. Res. Med., 54,
190-195, 2005. [3] MacMillan et al., 65, 1239-1246, 2011; [4] MacMillan et al.,
70, 916-924, 2013; [5] Emir et al., NMR Biomed., 30(7), doi: 10.1002/nbm.3714; [6] Shemesh et
al., Chem. Eur. J., 19, 13002-13008, 2013; [7] Shemesh et al., Nat Commun, doi: 10.1038/ncomms5958, 2014; [8,
6] Ordidge et al., J. Magn. Res., 66, 283, 1986; [9, 5] Pauly et al., IEEE
Trans. Med. Imaging, 10, 53-65, 1991;