Ke Zhang1,2, Seong Dae Yun3, Simon M.F. Triphan4, Volker J. Sturm1,2, Lukas R. Buschle1,2, Artur Hahn2, Sabine Heiland2, Martin Bendszus2, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer1, N. Jon Shah3,5, Christian H. Ziener1,2, and Felix T. Kurz1,2
1Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, 2Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, 3Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine – 4, Medical Imaging Physics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 4Department of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, 5Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, JARA, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Synopsis
To obtain vessel
architectural imaging (VAI), a dual gradient-echo/spin-echo EPI sequence
is needed to simultaneously track the dynamic signal changes in both gradient
echo and spin echo contrasts. However, brain coverage and in-plane matrix size
in previous brain studies were limited. In this study, the multiband excitation
and blipped-CAIPI techniques were applied to improve the slice coverage. To
enhance the in-plane resolution, two rephasing gradients were
inserted after the GE readout, to return the data
acquisition to the k-space center before the SE readout and enable parallel
imaging techniques.
INTRODUCTION
Vessel
architecture imaging (VAI) MRI is a useful technique for noninvasive
measurement of topological and structural heterogeneity of the microvasculature1,2.
To obtain VAI, a dual GE/SE EPI sequence is needed
to simultaneously track the dynamic signal changes in both GE and SE contrasts
after the injection of contrast agent. However, the brain coverage and
the in-plane matrix size in previous brain studies were limited3,4.
In this study, the MB (multiband) excitation and blipped-CAIPI
(blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging) techniques were applied to
improve the slice coverage. To enhance the in-plane
resolution, two rephasing gradients were inserted after the GE
readout, which returns the data acquisition to the k-space center before the SE
readout, to easily enable parallel imaging techniques (Fig. 1).METHODS
32 patients with gliomas were scanned
using a 20-channel head receive RF coil on a 3T Prisma Siemens scanner (Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany). By using readouts of dual GE/SE
2D EPI, 60 measurements including 10 baseline measurements were obtained in 1.5
minutes. Sequence parameters were as follows: TE (GE/SE)=22/90 ms,
dim=120×120×24, MB factor=2, iPAT factor=3, resolution=2×2×4.5 mm3,
TR=1.5s. Before VAI analysis, motion correction
including realign and reslicing was achieved with SPM (Wellcome Trust Center for
Neuroimaging, UCL, London, UK). The truncated relaxation rate time curves were
fitted with a gamma-variate function2,5.
VAI analysis was performed using in-house developed MATLAB code (MathWorks,
Natick, MA). For analysis of the VAI parameters, the
mean value and standard deviation at five different regions of interests (ROI) were
calculated: (a) tumor, (b) peritumoral
non-edematous tissue, (c) peritumoral edema, (d) contralateral normal appearing
brain tissue (cNAB), and (e) necrosis. ROIs were manually drawn for each
patient based on the features seen in the FLAIR and the contrast-enhanced
T1-weighted images, respectively.RESULTS
A
VHL from a voxel at the region of the middle cerebral artery is represented in
Fig. 2. After plotting the relaxation rate curves in a point-by-point
time-parametrized plot, we uncover a clockwise loop that is typical for large
arterial inflow. Multiple VAI parameters can be calculated from this curve: the
maximum distance between ascending and descending branches of the loop (I); the
long axis (slope length), short axis and signed area of the vortex curve
(microvessel type indicator MTI), the gradient of the long axis (slope), as
well as the vascular-induced bolus peak-time shift (VIPS) between the SE- and
GE-EPI signal curves,
see Fig. 3. To further examine
differences in tumor grades among the different VAI parameters, we performed a
ROI-based quantitative analysis that revealed that VAI parameters I and MTI to be significantly decreased in
the tumor core of HGG patients compared to LGG patients. Within the HGG patient
collective (yellow boxes in Fig. 4), these VAI parameters were also lower in
the tumor core than in the peritumor, edema and cNAB regions.
CONCLUSION
A
high resolution GE/SE EPI sequence for VAI was implemented. By using MB
excitation and blipped-CAIPI techniques, whole
brain coverage GE/SE EPI was reached. By inserting the rephasing gradient after the GE EPI, a
higher in-plane resolution can be easily achieved by exploiting parallel
techniques. The VAI parametric maps derived from this sequence provide
insights into the complexity and heterogeneity of vascular changes in brain
tumor.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Contract Grant number:
DFG ZI 1295/2-1 and DFG
KU 3555/1-1). F. T. Kurz was also supported by a postdoctoral
fellowship from the medical faculty of Heidelberg University and the
Hoffmann-Klose foundation of Heidelberg University.References
1. Emblem KE, Mouridsen K, Bjornerud A, et al. Vessel architectural
imaging identifies cancer patient responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Med 2013;19(9):1178-1183.
2. Stadlbauer A, et
al. Magnetic resonance imaging
biomarkers for clinical routine assessment of microvascular architecture in
glioma. J
Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;37(2):632-643.
3.
Kiselev VG, Strecker R, Ziyeh S, et al. Vessel size imaging in humans. Magn
Reson Med 2005; 53: 553–563.
4. Xu C, Kiselev VG, Möller HE, et al. Dynamic
hysteresis between gradient echo and spin echo attenuations in dynamic
susceptibility contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 2013; 69: 981–991.
5. Rausch M, Scheffler K, Rudin M, et al. Analysis of input functions from different
arterial branches with gamma variate functions and cluster analysis for
quantitative blood volume measurements. Magn Reson Imaging
2000;18(10):1235-43.