Edwin Heijman1, Esther Kneepkens2, Jochen Keupp3, Steffen Weiss3, and Holger Grüll4
1Oncology Solutions, Philips Research, Cologne, Germany, 2Biomedical NMR, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 3Philips Research, Hamburg, Germany, 4Department of Radiology, Experimental Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Netherlands
Synopsis
MR-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
(MR-HIFU) is a method that allows non-invasive heating of lesions to well-controlled
ablative or hyperthermic temperatures. Control of acoustic power and focus
position is achieved using a feedback based on MR thermometry. Local hyperthermia
can be used as a trigger for image guided drug delivery using temperature
sensitive liposomes co-encapsulating doxorubicin and MR contrast agent. The
challenge is to acquire both temperature and R1-maps during
hyperthermia dynamically. We investigated a novel MR method interleaving both
acquisitions, with their own temporal resolution, without compromising temperature
feedback showing a gradually increase of contrast agent inside rat tumors.
Purpose/introduction
MR-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
(MR-HIFU) mediated drug delivery has the promise to enhance the intratumoral
drug concentration, increasing the therapeutic window of chemotherapeutics. This
method is based on MR-HIFU induced hyperthermia as a trigger for temperature
sensitive liposomes (TSLs) to release its encapsulating drug locally. Based on
the release of both an MR contrast agent and a drug from TSLs, MR is able to
image the release distribution using R1-mapping (R1=1/T1).
In previous studies (1,2) the
distribution could only be imaged post treatment. We propose a novel method
where temperature mapping, necessary for controlling the hyperthermia, is
interleaved with R1-mapping enabling to image the co-release during
hyperthermia. Methods
TSLs composed of DPPC:HSPC:Chol:DPPE-PEG2000
(50:25:15:3 molar ratio) were prepared encapsulating doxorubicin (dox) and
ProHance® (3). Fisher
344 rats (age 11 ± 1 weeks) bearing a subcutaneous 9L gliosarcoma tumor were divided
into a control (N=4, no HIFU) and treatment group (N=4). When the tumor size
reached > 900 mm3, the animal was enrolled in the study. During
anesthesia the tumor was depilated and the animal received analgesia and was
placed in a small animal HIFU setup which was positioned on a 3T Philips Sonalleve
MR-HIFU tabletop (4). Body
temperature, water temperature near the tumor and respiration were continuously
monitored.
Figure 1A shows graphically the
experimental outline of this study starting with testing if heat and Gd loaded
TSL interfere with the R1 and temperature maps, respectively (2
and 3), followed by two times 15 min MR-HIFU hyperthermia (4 and 6;
8 mm treatment cell; frequency 1.4 MHz; acoustic power 14W). Non-interleaved R1
maps were acquired for comparison at baseline temperature.
To enable interleaved scanning the MR patch
MISS/iScan (5) was
modified for external control of interleaved scans. The interleaved sequence group contained an Inversion
Recovery-Look-Locker sequence (IR-LL) as “iScan” and Proton Resonance Frequency
Sequence (PRFS) as externally controlled “Dual scan” (see Figure 1B and C), for
R1 and temperature mapping respectively. Per dynamic cycle, one
inversion recovery curve was sampled and two PRFS slices (sagittal and coronal)
were acquired resulting in temporal resolution of 2 min and 8.6 s, respectively. To prevent signal saturation the IR-LL slice was placed adjacent to
the sagittal temperature map (Figure 1D).
After the experiment, the tumor was excised
for dox quantification using high-performance liquid chromatography
(doxorubicinmeasured). Whole tumor time-averaged R1,avg were
calculated from R1 maps which were derived from IR-LL acquired
apparent R1-maps (6). R1
values were then used to calculate the dox concentration (doxorubicincalculated)
from the intraliposomal Gd/dox ratio.Results
Figure 2 shows the average tumor R1
and temperature inside the treatment cell as well as the body temperature (red)
and the water temperature near the tumor (blue) of all four treated animals.
The interleaving of the IR-LL scans with PRFS scans did not hamper the
temperature control during hyperthermia. The
change in R1,avg (ΔR1, IL avg) correlated with the doxorubicinmeasured
(Figure 3A, R2adj = 0.933, p = 6.1∙10-5). A
Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 3B) indicated that on average, the difference
between the doxorubicincalculated and the doxorubicinmeasured
was 1.71 μg/g (95% CI ranging from −1.54 to 4.96 μg/g). During the experiment
of animal 1, the water in which the tumor was submerged had cooled down (~
35°C) resulting no release of Gd from the TSLs.
Conclusion
In this study, we successfully demonstrated
the implementation of an interleaved scanning approach during MR-HIFU induced
hyperthermia. The interleaved acquired temperature maps provided the HIFU
console sufficiently feedback to ensure stable hyperthermia, while the R1
maps allowed visualizing the co-release of doxorubicin and ProHance® in the
tumor. A good correlation was found between R1 change and
doxorubicin concentration. The interleaved scanning approach as opposed to a
single sequence allowed free choice of MRI sequences and independent
optimization of scan parameters, however, possible spin history effects need to
be avoided. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank NanoNextNL Project
03D.02, BMBF “TSL-LIFU” no. 3XP5014C and the European Union Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 603028 (iPaCT project) for
funding. Furthermore, Jeannette Smulders and Saskia Tromp - van den Bogaerdt
are acknowledged for the ICP-OES measurements (all Materials Analysis, Philips
Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). Furthermore, we would like to thank
David Veraart, Carlijn van Helvert, Leonie Niesen and Jo Habets (all Maastricht
University, Maastricht, the Netherlands) and Marije Janssen (Eindhoven
University of Technology) for the support with the animal experiments. References
1. Hijnen N, Kneepkens E, de Smet M, Langereis S, Heijman E, Grüll
H. Thermal combination therapies for local drug delivery by magnetic
resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 2017;114:E4802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700790114.
2. de Smet M, Heijman E, Langereis S,
Hijnen NM, Grüll H. Magnetic resonance imaging of high intensity focused
ultrasound mediated drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes: an in
vivo proof-of-concept study. 2010;150:102–10. doi:
10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.10.036.
3. de Smet M, Langereis S, van den Bosch S,
Grüll H. Temperature-sensitive liposomes for doxorubicin delivery under MRI
guidance. 2009;143:120–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.12.002.
4. Hijnen NM, Heijman E, Köhler MO,
Ylihautala M, Ehnholm GJ, Simonetti AW, Grüll H. Tumour hyperthermia and
ablation in rats using a clinical MR‐HIFU system equipped with a dedicated
small animal set‐up. International Journal of Hyperthermia [Internet]
2012;28:141–155. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2011.648137.
5. Henningsson M, Mens G, Koken P, Smink J,
Botnar RM. A new framework for interleaved scanning in cardiovascular MR:
Application to image-based respiratory motion correction in coronary MR
angiography. Magn Reson Med 2014;73:692–6. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25149.
6. Shin W, Gu H, Yang Y. Fast high-resolutionT1mapping
using inversion-recovery look-locker echo-planar imaging at steady state:
Optimization for accuracy and reliability. Magn Reson Med [Internet]
2009;61:899–906. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21836.