Xiang Xu1,2, Jing Liu1,3,4, Jiadi Xu1,2, Linda Knutsson1,5, Huanling Liu1,6, Yuguo Li1,2, Bachchu Lal7, John Laterra7, Peter C.M. van Zijl1,2, and Kannie Chan1,8
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Research Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Radiology College, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China, 4Department of Radiology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, China, 5Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 6Department of Ultrasound, Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital, Guangdong, China, 7Division of Cancer Imaging Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 8Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Synopsis
To investigate the origin of
glucoCEST contrast, we altered glucose utilization using an mTOR inhibitor (rapamycin) and studied dynamic glucoCEST
signals in a human glioblastoma mouse model. By inhibiting glucose transport, cellular
uptake and metabolism are suppressed and the perfusion of vessels and leakage
into extravascular extracellular space highlighted. A great
increase in glucoCEST contrast was seen in tumors in mice with the inhibitor
compared to without. This provides evidence of a large extracellular glucose
contribution to glucoCEST, and suggests that we can use glucoCEST to monitor
the efficacy of rapamicin with respect to its inhibitory effect.
Purpose
D-glucose can be used as a biocompatible
contrast agent for cancer detection by employing its hydroxyl protons as a
natural label for chemical exchange saturation transfer (glucoCEST) (1-4) or spin Lock (glucoCESL) (5,6,7) GlucoCEST
contrast can in principle originate from three different compartments: vascular
space (v), extravascular
extracellular space (EES) and
intracellular space (c), with the
latter containing mainly phosphorylated glucoses. We applied dynamic glucoCEST
enhanced (DGE) imaging(3) to study the effect of altered
glucose metabolism under the effect of
rapamycin in a human brain tumor mouse model,
with the purpose of identifying the compartmental contributions to glucoCEST
contrast. This inhibitor is used for glucose deprivation treatment in brain
tumors and is expected to affect the glucose utilization.Methods
Animal preparation: Human U87-EGFRvIII glioma cells
were implanted (0.5×105
cells/μl) by stereotaxic injection into the right caudate/putamen of female
SCID mice. Mice in the inhibitor group received intraperitoneal injection of the
inhibitor (rapamycin, 3 mg/kg every other day for two days) prior to MRI (8, 9). CEST imaging: Mice were fasted overnight and anesthetized using
isoflurane and positioned in an 11.7T horizontal bore Bruker Biospec scanner.
DGE images were acquired at a single frequency of 1.2 ppm for the hydroxyl protons
before, during and after glucose injection at a temporal resolution of 10 s for
both the inhibitor (N=4) and no treatment group (N=4). 0.15 mL 50% w/w glucose
was given over 60 s through the tail vein, leading to a prolonged increase in
vascular glucose levels as verified by analyzing glucoCEST signal in the blood
vessel. The DGE images were
acquired over 20
minutes using a short-echo Rapid Acquisition with Relaxation Enhancement (RARE) sequence, TR/TE =
5.0 s/3.8 ms, RARE factor of 23, a matrix of 128x64 and a FOV of 1.6 cm2 (All
images were normalized to an image without saturation acquired prior to injection).
A single slice with 0.12 x 0.25 mm3 in plane resolution and
thickness of 1 mm was imaged with fat suppression. Saturation was achieved by a
single continuous wave magnetization transfer pre-pulse of 3 s at B1
= 1.6 μT. Data analysis: Area-under-curve (AUC) was
calculated over 300 s post bolus
injection to study the uptake and retention of glucose. Results and Discussion
DGE contrast in the inhibitor group increased upon
glucose injection and after an initial maximum reduced and stabilized with a
similar pattern in the vessels, tumor and contralateral tissue (Fig. 1). DGE
highlighted the tumor as shown in the AUC image in Fig. 1, in a pattern similar
to previously reported for mice without treatment (3). Interestingly, the data in Figure 2 show that,
for contralateral brain, the steady state DGE signal returned to the pre-injection
level in the no-treatment group, while it remained high in the treatment group,
namely on the order of magnitude (~1%) of the no-treatment tumor contrast. The
tumor DGE contrast persisted during the total measurement period in both the no-treatment
and inhibitor-treatment group. The inhibitor effect is observable in the tumor,
contralateral brain and blood vessel (Fig. 2). The glucose enhancement under
the inhibitor effect is the more pronounced in the tumor. An increase of 3.7%± 2.3%
at maximum is observed compared to the contralateral brain where it is 1.7% ±1.3% at maximum. Interestingly, the glucoCEST signal in the blood vessel was
higher in the inhibitor treatment group, which suggests a global reduction in
glucose utilization under the inhibitor treatment. When considering the three compartments,
i.e. v, EES and c, the signal
difference between the two groups should be contributed to a consistent
increase in the vasculature (as confirmed by contralateral brain) and the absence
of cellular transport followed by tumor metabolism. Since the glucose transport
into the cells was reduced in the inhibitor group, the observed glucoCEST
signal was greater. For aggressive tumors such as human U87 glioma, the
observed high glucoCEST contrast in the tumor can be attributed to the acidic EES together with some contribution of increased vascular compartment
due to angiogenesis.Conclusion
The DGE
imaging approach enables the study of uptake and retention of glucose in tumors.
Comparing two groups of mice implanted with human brain tumors treated with and
without the inhibitor to alter the glucose utilization for treatment, a great
difference in glucoCEST contrast is seen. The stronger signal observed in the
inhibitor group provides evidence that a large part of glucoCEST signal
originates from the EES and blood
vessels. In addition, it can be concluded that DGE MRI can be applied to
monitor the inhibitor treatment efficacy with respect to drug delivery.
Acknowledgements
Grant
support: 1R21EB018934 and R01EB019934References
1. Chan KW, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2012;
68(6):1764-73.
2. Walker-Samuel S, et al. Nat Med. 2013;
19(8):1067-72.
3. Xu X, Chan KW, et al. Magn Reson Med.
2015; 74(6):1556-63.
4. Xu X, et al. Tomography. 2015;
1(2):105-14.
5. Jin T, Mehrens H, Hendrich KS, Kim SG.
J. Cereb. Blood Flow and Metab. 2014;34(8):1402-1410.
6. Zu Z, Spear J, Li H, Xu J, Gore JC.
Magn. Reson Imag. 2014;32(9):1078-1084.
7. Paech D, et al. Radiology 2017
Jun 16:162351. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162351
8. Cloughesy TF, et al. PLoS Med. 2008;
5(1):e8. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050008
9. Wei LH, et al. 2008; 14(11):3416-26.
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1824