Marcel Gutberlet1,2, Arnd Obert1,2, Andreas Voskrebenzev1,2, Filip Klimes1,2, Frank Wacker1,2, and Jens Vogel-Claussen1,2
1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 2Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
Synopsis
19F gas
washin/ washout MRI allows quantification of regional lung ventilation in free
breathing even in obstructed lungs. By increasing the temporal and spatial
resolution of dynamic 19F gas MRI at adequate image quality lung ventilation
imaging was improved. In addition to measuring regional gas washin/ washout
times, gas density variations during breathing were determined, giving further
information of gas dynamics and therefore lung function. Additionally, the concentration
of the fluorinated gas tracer and therefore its distribution in the lung was quantified. The
new approaches were tested in a healthy volunteer and a COPD patient.
Introduction
Mapping of
regional lung ventilation is essential for diagnosis and monitoring of
obstructive lung diseases like asthma and COPD.
Using fluorinated (19F) gas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
to measure washin/ washout kinetics by inhaling a mixture of the tracer gas
with oxygen over several breaths allows assessment of regional lung ventilation
even in obstructed lung regions and in free breathing [1-3]. In a previous
study, an excellent correlation of 19F gas washout time of the total
lung with
pulmonary function testing, the gold standard for diagnosis of COPD, was
found [3]. However, gas dynamics and gas distribution while inhaling a normoxic
fluorinated gas mixture are still not fully understood. Therefore, purpose of
this work was to acquire 19F gas washin / washout dynamics at an increased
spatial and temporal resolution and to quantify its distribution in the lung.Methods
One healthy
volunteer (30 years, male) and one patient with COPD (GOLD II, 76 years, male)
were enrolled in this feasibility study approved by the institutional review
board. Fluorinated gas MRI was performed on a 1.5 T scanner (Avanto,
Siemens) with a transmit Helmholtz coil and a
separate 16 channel phased-array receive coil (Rapid Biomedical) both tuned to 59.9 MHz. Each subject inhaled a mixture of
79% fluorinated gas (C3F8) and 21% oxygen from a 30L
reservoir bag via closed facemask tubing. After inhalation of pure oxygen for 3 minutes,
gas delivery was switched to the normoxic 19F gas mixture and gas
washin MRI was performed in free breathing for approximately 2 minutes using a
spoiled gradient echo (spGRE) sequence with stack of stars trajectory and an
incrementation of the projection angle by the golden angle (TE=1.7
ms, TR=3.4 ms, flip angle: 30°, FOV: 400x400x240 mm3,
matrix size: 64x64x12, 3496 projections). Applying
a sliding window approach, for each 3D block 32 consecutive projections were reconstructed
with a non-Cartesian parallel imaging algorithm resulting
in 216 time points at a temporal resolution of 544 ms [4]. Subsequently, to
quantify 19F gas concentration in the lung, in a single breath-hold
T1 relaxation time was determined with the variable flip angle (VFA)
method [5-7] (3D spGRE sequence with Cartesian sampling, TE=1.7 ms, TR=5
ms, three flip angles: 20°, 30° and 40°, FOV: 500x375x240 mm3,
matrix size: 64x48x12, 2 averages, total scan
time: 17.2 s). After switching to pure oxygen again, 19F gas washout
imaging was started with the identical sequence as used for washin imaging.
Dynamic data were sorted corresponding to its respiratory phase. Regional gas
washin/ washout time and fractional ventilation (FV) respectively were
calculated from the inspiratory 3D images. Additionally, eight temporal samples
of 3D 19F MRI were reconstructed representing one respiratory cycle
in order to calculated FV from gas density variations similar to 1H
dynamic lung MRI [8, 9].Results
The gas
washin dynamics in the healthy volunteer show a very homogeneous gas uptake
over the whole lung (Figure 1). Fractional
ventilation derived from the gas washin dynamics and by analysis of the gas
density variation under breathing provided similar results (Figure 2, average of FV for the total lung: 17.0±5.2% vs. 18.9±8.7% (healthy subject) and 7.3±5.2% vs. 8.5±6.3% (COPD
patient)). The mean
fluorinated gas concentration in the total lung was below the concentration of
the inhaled gas mixture of 79% C3F8 with a lower gas
concentration in the COPD lung (healthy: 64.0±27.3% C3F8, COPD: 47.1±26.3% with T1 relaxation times:
13.1±2.8 ms and 12.0±3.1 ms respectively). The gas images acquired after inhalation of
approximately 30L of the normoxic 19F gas mixture show regions of
reduced gas concentration due to bronchial obstruction in the COPD patient (Figure 3).Discussion
Compared to previous work, spatial and temporal resolution of 19F
dynamic gas MRI in free breathing could be improved (by a factor of 2.5 and 4 respectively) at adequate image quality. Acquisition of pulmonary 19F gas washin/ washout imaging at a sampling rate below the respiratory frequency gives the
opportunity to quantify regional ventilation by both measuring the gas washin/
washout time and by measuring gas density variations in the lung. The resulting
FV showed a good agreement for both approaches. The measured gas concentrations
show that after inhalation of 30L of normoxic C3F8 gas
mixture the equilibrium gas concentration is not reached. The lower gas
concentration in the COPD patient compared to the healthy volunteer may be
explained by the increased gas washin time due to bronchial obstruction.Conclusion
Increased
spatial and temporal resolution may help to improve quantification of regional
lung ventilation. The reduced gas concentration compared to the equilibrium gas
concentration even after inhalation of 30L of the gas mixture needs to be
considered for future 19F gas applications like diffusion or flow
imaging. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Couch MJ, et al. NMR in Biomed. 2014;
27(12): 1525–1534.
[2] Halaweish AF, et al. J
Chest. 2013;144(4):1300-10.
[3] Gutberlet M, et al.
Radiology 2017; doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170591, in press
[4] Uecker M, et al. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2015;23:2486.
[5] Christensen KA, et al. J Phys Chem
1974;78:1971-1977
[6] Chang Y, et al. J Magn Reson 2006;181(2):191-198
[7] Terekhov MV, et al. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2007;15:1136
[8] Zapke M. et al. Respir Rs
2006;7(1):106
[9] Tibiletti M, et al. Proc Intl Soc
Mag Reson Med 2017;25:1189