Takayuki Masui1, Motoyuki Katayama1, Mitsuteru Tsuchiya1, Masako Sasaki1, Kenshi Kawamura1, Yuki Hayashi1, Takahiro Yamada1, Naoyuki Takei2, Yuji Iwadate2, and Kang Wang3
1Radiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan, 2Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Hino, Japan, 3Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Madison, Japan
Synopsis
Fat-sat DISCO is modified version of DISCO,
based on LAVA with view-sharing, which can be used for dynamic contrast MR
imaging with high temporal resolutions. Gadobutrol has higher concentration of
Gadolinium and its single bolus injection might induce T2 shorting effects. Simultaneous
bolus injection of Gadobutrol and saline may suppress T2 shorting effects and will
facilitate enhancement on T1-weighted imaging. Using fat-sat DISCO with
simultaneous bolus injection of Gadobutrol and saline, dynamic contrast MR imaging
of the lung can steadily provide selective visualization of pulmonary
vasculatures and parenchymal enhancement.
Introduction
Dynamic contrast pulmonary MR imaging with
high temporal resolution can provide information of selective vascular anatomy
and parenchymal perfusion. Currently, we used a modified version of Differential
Sub-sampling with Cartesian Ordering1 (F-DISCO), which is based on 3D
T1-weighted imaging, LAVA with Spec IR using adiabatic pulse for fat saturation
and apparent temporal resolution for one phase covering the thorax can be set less
than two seconds. Gadobutrol (Gd-DO3A-butrol, Bayer HC) may induce strong T2
shorting effects with bolus injection due to higher concentration of Gadolinium.
Thus, simultaneous injection of gadobutrol and saline can be performed for
dilution. Accordingly, the purpose was to evaluate feasibility of dynamic enhanced
MR imaging for evaluation of the pulmonary vasculatures and parenchyma using fast
imaging technique F-DISCO with simultaneous injection of Gadobutrol and saline.
Materials and Methods
The current study was approved by the
institutional review board (IRB) in our hospital and informed consent was
obtained from each patient.
Population: 30 patients who underwent dynamic contrast MR imaging for the
evaluation of the thorax were included (men:women=20:10 , mean age 45 years
old).
MRI: MR imaging was performed on a 3T magnet (Discovery 750, GEHC) with
32 channel phased array multicoil. After localization, dynamic contrast
enhanced MR imaging was performed with F-DISCO (a modified version of DISCO), with following imaging parameters;
TR 2.6ms, TE 0.9ms, 70-88 slices, 25-30phases, slice thickness 3-5mm with 50%
overlap, FOV 35-40cm, Matrix 256x224-200, SecIR (adiabatic pulse) for fat saturation.
Apparent temporal resolution per phase was 1.4-1.9sec.
MR
contrast medium and Injection method: MR contrast
medium Gadobutrol (Gd-BT-DO3A 1.0mmol/mL, 0.1mmol/kg, Bayer HC) was injected through cubital vein at an injection rate
of 1ml/sec with simultaneous injection of saline at the rate of 2ml/sec). Two second
after injection of Gd-chelate, serial dynamic MR images were obtained with possible
20-30 seconds’ breath holding followed by quiet free breathing.
Evaluations:
Subjective:
With selection of optimal phase for visualization
of following structure as
Right ventricle, Pulmonary artery (main,
distal), Pulmonary parenchyma, Pulmonary veins (main), Ascending Aorta- Aortic
arch, image quality (overall, homogenous SI for each structure), artifacts (blurring,
noise), degree and homogeneity of fat signal suppression (mediastinum,
supraclavicular area) were evaluated using a five point scale (5 excellent, no
artifact-1 poor, artifacts).
And in the selected phase for each
structure, visualization of 28 segments of the vasculatures in each patient was
evaluated using a five point scale (5 excellent-1 not visualized, poor): the pulmonary
arteries, veins and the aorta.
Homogeneous enhancement in the pulmonary
parenchyma was evaluated and recognition of Minor fissure in the right lung was
also evaluated using a five point scale (5 excellent- 1 poor, not visualized).
Positive (Visualized) and negative was
regarded as for sore of 4 and 5, and for that of 1 or 2, respectively. Three
observers independently evaluated features and difference in positive and
negative documents were resolved with consensus.
Objective:
Signal intensity changes in each structure
for serial dynamic contrast images.Results
In all cases, image qualities for pulmonary
vasculatures were good and artifacts were not prominent (Fig 1). All 28
segments of pulmonary vasculatures were well visualized (Figs 2-4A). Homogenous
enhancement of the pulmonary parenchyma could be observed in all cases and
minor fissure in the right lung could be recognized as low intensity area
(Fig4B). Fat saturation was accomplished in the mediastinum but, in
supraclavicular areas, fat saturation was inhomogenously made (Fig 4B).
Representative signal intensity change in
various regions (Fig 5).
Perfusion
of the pulmonary parenchyma could be recognized in all patients.Discussion
The current study demonstrated fast dynamic
contrast imaging with high temporal resolutions could constantly provide
vascular anatomy as well as perfusion of pulmonary parenchyma. The contrast
media utilized in the current study was Gadobutrol which has high
concentration as twice higher than other Gd-chelate. Thus, bolus injection of
contrast media might induce strongly T2 shorting effects. Resultantly, less
contrast enhancement in the pulmonary parenchyma could be expected. In the
current study, simultaneous injection of Gadobutrol with slower injection rate
of 1mL/sec and 2mL/sec injection rate of saline was made. This method might
achieve dilution of the contrast media, and pulmonary parenchyma could be
enhanced with good recognition, thus, pulmonary perfusion defect might be
evaluated as minor fissures.Conclusion
Using fast imaging technique fat-sat DISCO with
simultaneous bolus injection of Gadobutrol and saline, dynamic contrast MR imaging
of the lung can steadily provide information of pulmonary vasculatures and perfusion
of pulmonary parenchyma.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) JMRI 2012; 35(6):1484