Erika P Raven1,2, Peter van Gelderen1, Diana H Fishbein3, John W VanMeter2, and Jeff H Duyn1
1Advanced MRI, LFMI, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2Georgetown Center for Functional and Molecular Imaging, Washington, DC, United States, 3Program for Translational Research on Adversity and Neurodevelopment, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, MD, United States
Synopsis
The spatiotemporal growth trajectories of white
matter, and in particular myelin, are an important part of cognitive
development during adolescence. Quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT)
imaging can be used to measure the fraction of non-water protons (fMT) as an estimate of myelin
in vivo. Here we used a recently
developed, time-efficient pulsed MT approach to extract fMT from white matter regions at different stages of
development in a community-based cohort of adolescents. We tested the sensitivity of this
approach for detecting region-specific change in fMT in repeated scans that covered a period of 18
months.
Introduction
Neuroimaging studies of adolescent development have provided evidence for the regional maturation of white matter,
particularly for late-myelinating regions such as frontal lobe.1 While these changes are concurrent with histological
evidence of increased myelination,2,3 standard techniques typically used in longitudinal
studies, such as volume and diffusion metrics, are nonspecific to myelin as
they represent the combined effects of multiple tissue and acquisition
parameters.4,5 Alternatively, quantitative magnetization transfer
(qMT) imaging can be used to estimate distinct tissue characteristics, i.e. the
fraction of non-water, mostly macromolecular protons (MP), that are abundant in
myelinated tissue.6 To do this in a time-efficient manner, we applied a
recently developed qMT approach to estimate MP fraction (fMT) in a longitudinal study of adolescents. Using a
brief, efficient MT pulse followed by a gradient-echo EPI sequence, the transient
saturation of MPs was measured as a function of variable delay time after each pulse.7,8 The feasibility of this technique for use in developmental
studies was tested by extracting fMT
in white matter regions selected to span both early and late maturation trajectories,
including optic
radiation (OR), splenium (SCC) and genu (GCC) of the corpus callosum, and
frontal white matter (FLWM), respectively. We hypothesized late-myelinating
regions (FLWM, GCC) would have increased fMT
versus early myelinating regions (SCC, OR) that have reached “peak” maturation during
the period of investigation. Methods
Fifty-six
adolescent participants were scanned two times, 18 months apart (average ages
14.31±0.72; 15.86±0.73, respectively), on a 3T Siemens MRI scanner using a
12-channel receive array. A two-pool model of exchange was used to estimate fMT from saturation recovery experiments as performed
in 7,8. To allow for accurate extraction of fMT, two sets of EPI scans were acquired using 1) a transient,
double inversion pre-pulse (“MT”) to saturate the MP pool, and 2) a single
inversion pre-pulse (IR) to establish T1 relaxation of the free water pool.
The MT pulse was applied at five variable delay times (t=10, 71, 132, 193, and 254ms), a pulse duration of 6ms, and
pulse amplitude (B1) of 750Hz for a total of eighteen repetitions
(three with no pulse for reference) and scan time of 6:16min. The IR pulse was
applied at five delay times (t=9,
203, 461, 843, and 1600ms), a pulse duration of 5.12ms, and B1
amplitude of 750Hz. IR scans had four repetitions (two for reference) and scan
time of 1:24min. Both EPI scans had a resolution of 1.7mm3 and
SENSE=2. The TE was 30ms, and TRs were 2 and 3s for MT and IR experiments,
respectively. ROIs were drawn on EPI reference images. MT exchange was
estimated over time (t) using a
bi-exponential model.8,9 From this, we calculated the MP pool fraction,
or fMT, and compared results
from each scan within individuals. Variation
across volunteers within each ROI was also assessed as the ratio of SD to mean fMT (SD/mean*100). Results
The OR,
SCC, and GCC ROIs did not show a significant change between time points;
however, FLWM was significantly increased (t(49)=3.19, p<0.003). From this moderate effect (Hedges’s g =0.36), we observed 31 total participants, or ~60%, to
have increased fMT. There
were no within subject deltas greater than 15% for any white matter region with
average increase in FLWM being ~2.5% for all individuals. The across-cohort variability of each ROI ranged from
5.3-6.3% for Time 1, and 6.0-7.6% for Time 2. Low variability (<10%) was to
be expected, given the narrow age range and healthy status of participants at
each time point.Discussion
Using
a rapid qMT approach, we observed a significant increase in FLWM fMT (~2.5%) over an 18-month time
span in a community-sample of adolescents. This result was consistent with
protracted maturation in frontal lobe, although we did not detect change in
GCC, which sub-serves interhemispheric communication to frontal regions. This may
be due to the narrow age range sampled for this study, or that GCC is
relatively mature by mid- to late-adolescence. Alternatively, detecting small longitudinal
effects is dependent on the stability of the technique; however, there were no changes
greater than 15% for any region indicating excellent precision of fMT estimation.
Previous test-retest results (repeated scans at 3T, n=5
adults) reported only small errors (0.5%) in fMT8, contributing towards its high
reproducibility and sensitivity. Assuming similar error, variance across volunteers (~6%) far surpassed this threshold; thus, it is plausible for use in the detection of biological differences. Future longitudinal
studies would benefit from rapid acquisition of fMT estimation as presented in this abstract. In
addition, the MT pulse used has low RF power deposition and is
insensitive to B1 inhomogeneities, facilitating use at ultra-high
field (e.g. 7T) where increased SNR and T1 relaxation contribute to
enhanced MT effects.Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by the NIH/NIAAA
1R01AA01998301, Intramural Research Program of the NIH/NINDS, and the Metropolitan
Washington Chapter of Achievement Rewards for College Scientists.
References
1. Lebel C,
Beaulieu C. Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from
childhood into adulthood. J Neurosci. 2011;31(30):10937-10947.
2. Yakovlev PI, Lecours A-R.
The myelogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In: Regional
Development of Brain in Early Life; 1967:3-70.
3. Flechsig P. Anatomie des
menschlichen Gehirns und Rückenmarks auf myelogentischer Grundlage. 1920:9-37.
4. Tamnes CK, Roalf DR,
Goddings A, Lebel C. Diffusion MRI of white matter microstructure development
in childhood and adolescence: Methods, challenges and progress. bioRxiv preprint. 2017.
5. Mills KL, Tamnes CK.
Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis
across development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014;9:172-190.
6. Henkelman RM, Huang X,
Xiang Q, Stanisz GJ, Swanson SD, Bronskill MJ. Quantitative interpretation of
magnetization transfer. Magn Reson Med. 1993;29:759-766.
7. van Gelderen P, Jiang X,
Duyn JH. Exploring a flexible pulse design for studying magnetization transfer.
Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 23. 2015;630(2001):996.
8. van Gelderen P, Jiang X,
Duyn JH. Rapid measurement of brain macromolecular proton fraction with transient
saturation transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2016;77:2174-2185.
9. van Gelderen P, Jiang X,
Duyn JH. Effects of magnetization transfer on T1 contrast in human brain white
matter. NeuroImage. 2016;128:85-95.