Synopsis
Pericardial late gadolinium enhancement was correlated with pathologic specimens in 52 patients who had pericardiectomy performed for constrictive or chronic pericarditis. Pericardial LGE is an indicator of pericardial inflammation; however, it does not reliably distinguish inflammation from fibrosis: LGE was seen in 9/10 patients with pericardial fibrosis and minimal or no pericardial inflammation. Pericardial edema or early pericardial enhancement may be more useful biomarkers for pericardial inflammation.
Introduction
Pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) has been
correlated with pathologic evidence of inflammation, and therefore cardiac MRI
may be useful in assessing the extent of pericardial inflammation as well as in
evaluating the response of patients with pericarditis to anti-inflammatory medical
therapy. Fibrotic pericardial thickening
in the setting of chronic or recurrent pericarditis may also demonstrate
enhancement, however, and this may limit the utility of LGE images in
quantifying active inflammation. We
evaluated cardiac MRI examinations in 52 patients who had subsequent
pericardiectomy for constrictive or chronic pericarditis to assess how well the
presence and extent of pericardial enhancement on LGE images correlated with
the presence of inflammation at pathology.Materials and Methods
A search of the cardiac MRI database revealed 52 patients
who had MRI performed between 2014 and 2017 for indications including
pericarditis and had subsequent cardiac surgery which included partial or
complete pericardiectomy or pericardial biopsy performed within 6 months of the
MRI. LGE images were assessed for the presence or absence of pericardial
enhancement, and when present was quantified as mild, moderate, or severe. Early post-gadolinium images (acquired 1 – 3 minutes
following gadolinium injection) were also assessed when present. Triple inversion recovery T2-weighted images
were also assessed for the presence or absence of pericardial edema. Results
Pathologic specimens were involved by both fibrous
thickening and predominantly lymphocytic infiltration in a majority of
specimens (42). In these patients, pericardial LGE was noted in 40/42 cases. In 10 patients, an
inflammatory component was either absent or described as minimal. Pericardial LGE was present in 9/10 of these
patients, classified as mild in 6 and moderate in 3 (Fig. 1). Mild pericardial edema was noted in 2 of
these patients, and early pericardial enhancement in none of these patients
(with early enhancement images available in 5/10). Pericardial inflammation was
graded as moderate in 11 patients and marked in a single patient. Pericardial LGE was present in all of these
patients, classified as moderate or marked in 7 and mild in 4. Pericardial edema was present in 7 patients, and
early pericardial enhancement was seen in 3 of 4 patients with available data.Discussion
Although
pericardiectomy remains the gold standard therapy for constrictive
pericarditis, the not insignificant associated morbidity and mortality have led
some cardiologists to advocate a trial of anti-inflammatory medication in
patients who are not severely symptomatic. Cardiac MRI can potentially be used
to assess the presence and extent of pericardial inflammation at baseline,
thereby identifying patients most likely to respond to anti-inflammatory
therapy, and can also evaluate response to therapy. Pericardial LGE is a reliable indicator of
pericardial inflammation; however, in the setting of constrictive pericarditis
or chronic pericarditis, the presence of pericardial fibrosis can be a
confounding variable – we saw LGE in 9/10 patients who had no or minimal
inflammation in their pathologic specimens.
Pericardial edema and early pericardial enhancement had better
correlation with pathologic inflammation, and these may be more useful
biomarkers of pericardial inflammation. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
No reference found.