Ashley M. Stokes1, Zhiqiang Li2, James G. Pipe2, Richard J. Caselli3, Marwan N. Sabbagh4, and Leslie C. Baxter5
1Translational Bioimaging Group, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 2Magnetic Resonance Technology Design Group, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 3Mayo Clinic - Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, United States, 4Neurology, Alzheimer’s and Memory Disorders, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 5Human Brain Mapping Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Synopsis
The goal of this project is to establish
advanced MRI signatures of each stage of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), including
preclinical, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia stages. These
advanced imaging methods will allow us to non-invasively investigate the
underlying neurobiological changes that precede cognitive impairment. While
structural MRI is known to change with disease progression, advanced MR imaging
may provide more specific signatures of disease progression. The asymptomatic and MCI
phases represent a clear potential for early intervention, and the non-invasive
methods developed here may identify patients along the clinical trajectory of
AD.
Introduction
It has been estimated that a 10-year delay in
the onset of AD may essentially eliminate the disease [1], highlighting the importance of early detection.
Although structural MRI is widely used in the assessment of AD-induced
morphological changes [2], these changes are known to occur late in the AD
trajectory and may not be ideal early biomarkers. Functional and molecular
changes precede brain atrophy [3,4] and may be detectable using advanced MRI in the
earlier MCI phases, when intervention would prove most beneficial. The goal of
this project is to establish advanced MR imaging signatures that are
phenotypical of each stage of AD. In this study, arterial spin labeling (ASL)
is used to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF), intravoxel incoherent motion
diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) provides measures of perfusion fraction
and diffusion, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is used to probe
AD-related molecular species, and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is
sensitive to iron deposition. Each of these metrics was chosen for its
sensitivity to a known or suspected pathological change associated AD. We
hypothesize that these advanced metrics may provide early biomarkers for
incipient MCI or AD, prior to morphological changes.Methods
Three subject groups were recruited for this cross-sectional
study: cognitively normal (CN), MCI, and AD (Table 1). All subjects underwent
cognitive testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), functional
assessment staging (FAST), and clock draw immediately prior to MRI. MRI data were
acquired at 3T (Ingenia, Philips). Structural MRI data was obtained using ADNI
(Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative) protocols [5], and structural parcellation was performed using
FreeSurfer software [6,7]. CBF was measured using a 3D spiral-based
pseudo-continuous ASL pulse sequence (TR/TE = 4400/15 ms, voxel size = 2.75 x
2.75 x 6 mm3, 90 mm inferior labeling distance, 1800 ms label
duration, and 2000 ms post-labeling delay) [8]. Control and tagged image pairs were acquired, along
with an additional proton-density (PD)-weighted imaging volume, to quantify
voxel-wise CBF maps. The perfusion-insensitive diffusion coefficient (D) and
blood volume fraction (fp) were obtained using IVIM-DWI (single-shot spin-echo
EPI sequence with TR/TE = 6000/50 ms, voxel size = 2.5 mm isotropic, 40 slices,
with three orthogonal diffusion-encoding directions and 8 b-values (b = 0, 25,
50, 75, 100, 200, 500, 1000 s/mm2)). The diffusion data were
normalized to the b = 0 data and then fit to a bi-exponential model to
obtain IVIM parameters [9]. Glutamate (3.0 ppm) and amide (3.5 ppm) proton
transfer (APT) were probed using pulsed CEST sequence (3D gradient-echo, TR/TE
= 54/8.7 ms, voxel size = 1.5 x 1.5 x 5.0 mm3, 26 slices, 25 ms 1 μT
gauss pulse with 48 interleaved offsets). Quantification of GluCEST [10] and APT was calculated using the residual from a
Lorentzian fit. SWI was acquired to quantify cerebral microbleeds (3D multi-gradient-echo,
TR/TE/ΔTE = 31/7.2/6.2 ms, 4 echoes, voxel size = 1.0 mm
isotropic). Minimum intensity projections (minIP) were reconstructed with 10 mm
slice thickness. All data were registered to the T1-weighted image volume using
the affine (12 DOF) registration algorithm FLIRT (FSL, FMRIB Centre, Univ. of
Oxford) for ROI analysis. Regional metrics were compared using an unpaired
t-test. Work is ongoing to acquire longitudinal data in this cohort. Results / Discussion
Mean (± standard deviation) scores for the MoCA,
FAST, and clock-draw are shown in Table 1. Figure 1 illustrates representative
imaging examples from each group and imaging method. Across all subjects,
regional analysis of structural MRI (Figure 2) revealed significantly reduced
cortical thickness and hippocampal volume, while lateral and inferior lateral
ventricular volumes were elevated. Figure 3 shows the regional analyses for the
advanced MRI biomarkers. Both cerebral cortex and cerebral WM showed lower
perfusion for the AD subjects, though these results were not significant. The
perfusion-insensitive (IVIM-D) diffusion coefficient showed significant
differences in the cerebral cortex, with increased diffusion in the AD subjects
(p = 0.002 for CN vs. AD and p = 0.004 for MCI vs. AD). These results may
indicate altered microstructural characteristics. GluCEST was reduced in the AD
subjects, consistent with prior MR spectroscopy results [11]; additionally, APT-CEST showed lower CEST signal in
the AD subjects, suggesting altered protein content in these patients. SWI
analysis is currently underway to quantify and characterize cerebral
microbleeds in each group.Conclusions
This study lays the framework for the
development of advanced multi-parametric MRI to characterize the
neuropathological changes that occur in Alzheimer’s disease. These advanced
imaging signatures may be early indicators of incipient AD-related MCI or dementia,
when intervention would prove most beneficial.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Arizona Alzheimer’s
Consortium, Barrow Neurological Foundation, and Philips Healthcare.References
[1] DeKosky ST, Marek K.
Looking Backward to Move Forward: Early Detection of Neurodegenerative
Disorders. Science (80- ) 2003;302:830–4. doi:10.1126/science.1090349.
[2] Frisoni GB, Fox NC,
Jack Jr. CR, Scheltens P, Thompson PM.
The clinical use of structural MRI in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol
2010;6:67–77. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2009.215.
[3] Jack Jr CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen
PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the
Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 2016;9:119–28.
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6.
[4] Li TQ, Wahlund LO. The
search for neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease with advanced MRI
techniques. Acta Radiol 2011;52:211–22. doi:10.1258/ar.2010.100053.
[5] Jack Jr. CR, Bernstein MA, Fox NC, Thompson P,
Alexander G, Harvey D, et al. The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
(ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:685–91.
doi:10.1002/jmri.21049.
[6] Dale A, Fischl B, Sereno
MI. Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface
Reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9:179–94.
[7] Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale
A. Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: II: Inflation, Flattening, and a
Surface-Based Coordinate System. Neuroimage 1999;9:195–207.
[8] Li Z, Schär M, Wang D,
Zwart NR, Madhuranthakam AJ, Karis JP, et al. Arterial spin labeled perfusion
imaging using three-dimensional turbo spin echo with a distributed
spiral-in/out trajectory. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:266–73. doi:10.1002/mrm.25645.
[9] Meeus EM, Novak J, Withey
SB, Zarinabad N, Dehghani H, Peet AC. Evaluation of intravoxel incoherent
motion fitting methods in low-perfused tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016.
doi:10.1002/jmri.25411.
[10] Haris M, Nath K, Cai K,
Singh A, Crescenzi R, Kogan F, et al. Imaging of glutamate neurotransmitter
alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Nmr Biomed 2013;26:386–91.
doi:10.1002/nbm.2875.
[11] Rupsingh R, Borrie M, Smith
M, Wells JL, Bartha R. Reduced hippocampal glutamate in Alzheimer disease.
Neurobiol Aging n.d.;32:802–10. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.002.