Thomas Christen1, Wendi W. Ni1, Jia Guo1, Audrey P. Fan1, Michael M. Moseley1, and Greg Zaharchuk1
1Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
The MR vascular fingerprinting (MRvF) approach extends the concept of MR
fingerprinting to the study of microvascular properties and functions. Encouraging
results have been obtained in healthy human volunteers as well as in stroke and
tumor models in rats. However, it has been suggested that the method has a low
sensitivity to blood oxygenation measurements. In this study, we tested the
MRvF approach in healthy volunteers while
breathing different gas mixtures (Hyperoxia (100%O2), Normoxia (21%O2),
hypoxia (14%O2)) and examined the results when different types of
fingerprints are considered.
Introduction:
The MR vascular fingerprinting (MRvF) approach1 extends the
concept of MR fingerprinting2 to the study of microvascular
properties and functions. The MR signal evolution
(Free Induction Decay + Spin echo=fingerprint) is sampled in each voxel and
compared to a dictionary of curves obtained using advanced numerical
simulations of the same experiment. The results are high-resolution parametric
maps representing blood volume fraction (CBV), blood vessels radius (R), and
blood oxygenation (SO2). Encouraging results have been obtained in healthy
human volunteers1 as well as in stroke and tumor models in rats3.
However, it has been suggested that the method has a low sensitivity to blood
oxygenation measurements1,4. In this study, we tested the MRvF
approach in healthy volunteers while breathing
different gas mixtures (Hyperoxia (100%O2), Normoxia (21%O2),
hypoxia (14%O2)) and examined the results when different types of
fingerprints are considered.Materials and Methods:
The local IRB committee approved all studies. Experiments
were performed at 3T (GE Healthcare Systems, Waukesha, WI) with an 8-channel GE
receive-only head coil. The MR acquisition protocol included: (1) a blood T2
mapping sequence based on the TRUST approach5 for independent blood
oxygenation measurements (acq matrix=64x64, FOV=22x22cm2, NA=4, TR=10s,
TEs=20-40-60-100ms, Acq time=264s). (2) A GESFIDE sequence for fingerprinting
(TR=2000ms, 40echoes, SE=100ms, FOV=20*20cm2, ST=1.5mm, 128*128, 12slices,
Tacq=4min). 10 volunteers were scanned while breathing different gas mixtures (Hyperoxia
(100%O2), Normoxia (21%O2), hypoxia (14%O2)). Each epoch lasted 6 minutes and
acquisitions started after 1 min to ensure stable gas environment and subject
physiology. The protocol was repeated after intravenous injection of Feraheme (off
label contrast agent, 7 mg Fe/kg, AMAG Pharmaceuticals
Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) and the ratio of the GESFIDE acquisitions pre and
post contrast was initially taken as ‘vascular fingerprint’1. Simulations
and post processing were performed as previously described1.Results:
Physiological monitoring and TRUST measurements (Fig.1) indicated global
changes of blood oxygenation during the gas challenges. MRvF parametric maps obtained in one volunteer during the 3 challenges are
presented in Fig.2a-c. CBV maps show a good contrast between GM and WM, while
Vessel Radius and Blood oxygen saturation maps are more homogeneous. The
numerical values obtained during normoxia and averaged over the volunteers are
consistent with previous reports. However, no changes were observed in SO2
estimates between the gas challenges. The accuracy of the fingerprinting
approach depends on the ability to separate the fingerprints signals in the
dictionary. In order to study the sensitivity of MRvF to SO2, we
examined the dictionaries (pre-contrast, post-contrast, ratio pre/post,
Fig.3a-c) when CBV and R are fixed (Fig.3d-f). It can be observed that the
maximum sensitivity to SO2 appears in the pre-contrast dictionary (green
arrow) while only a portion of the ratio dictionary allows for curves discrimination.
These findings are summarized in Fig.3g-i where the standard deviation of the
curves is computed at each echo time. Figure 4 extends the previous results for
all parameters. It confirms that the maximum sensitivity to SO2 is
obtained in the pre-contrast dictionary (although CBV also influences the results) and
shows that the method is mostly sensitive to CBV changes (especially using the
post-contrast dictionary). R measurements should be extracted from the ratio
dictionary. Given these observations, we designed a new fingerprint that
concatenates the pre, post and ratio signals. Figure 5 shows the new results
after using this updated dictionary. The CBV and R results are similar to those initially
obtained but the SO2 estimates now show significant differences
between hypoxic and hyperoxic measurements.Conclusion:
This study shows that MRvF maps can be obtained in
healthy volunteers while modifying the inspired oxygen content. Results confirm
that the original MRvF fingperprint pattern has a low sensitivity for SO2
measurements. By analyzing the properties of the dictionaries, we show that it
is possible to design a new fingerprint pattern with higher SO2 sensitivity
which seems promising for non-invasive detection of hypoxic tissues in several
pathologies. Acknowledgements
Supported
in part by (NIH 5R01NS066506, NIH 2RO1NS047607, NCRR 5P41RR09784, R21-NS087491).References
[1] Christen et.al, Neuroimage, 2014 [2] Ma et.al,
Nature, 2013 [3] Lemasson et.al, Scientific Reports 2016 [4] Pouliot et.al,
Neuroimage 2017 [5] Lu and Ge, MRM, 2008.