Begoña Lavin Plaza1, Alkystis Phinikaridou1, Marcelo E Andia2, and René M Botnar1
1School of Biomedical Engineering Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Radiology department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Synopsis
Atherosclerosis is a systemic,
inflammatory disease of the large and medium-sized arteries. Although vascular interventions aim at treating focal stenosis, they may
trigger systemic responses that accelerate lesions elsewhere. Elastin
remodeling plays a crucial role in vessel wall thickening with monocytes and
vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) being the primary sources of elastin
synthesis. In this study, we used an elastin-binding MR contrast agent to
assess whether (1) vascular injury in the abdominal aorta accelerates
atherosclerosis in the brachiocephalic artery located distally to the site of
injury (2), whether antibiotic treatment alters vascular elastin remodeling and
(3) whether antibiotic
treatment alters VSMC migration and proliferation and monocyte recruitment and
polarization.
Introduction
Intimal thickening
occurs in blood vessels in response to focal mechanical injury or
atherosclerosis. Intimal thickening is associated with activation of vascular
smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and increased recruitment of monocytes, that affect
extracellular matrix remodeling1.
Minocycline is a tetracycline derivate with cardioprotective effects
independent of its antimicrobial properties2-4.
We have previously shown that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI using an
elastin-specific binding contrast agent (ESMA) provides information on elastin remodeling
in animal models of cardiovascular diseases5-7.
Here, we investigated the merits of Gd-ESMA to assess in vivo (1) whether focal vascular injury accelerates atherosclerosis in segments
located distally to the site of injury, (2)
whether minocycline affects elastin remodeling both focally, at the site of aortic
injury, and distally in the brachiocephalic artery (BCA) and (3) whether minocycline
treatment has a direct effect on VSMCs (migration and proliferation) and
monocyte recruitment and polarization.Methods
Study
design is described in Fig 1A. Animal surgical model: Aortic endothelial injury was
performed as described previously8. In-vivo
MRI: A 3T MR
scanner (Philips Achieva, Best, NL) equipped with a 47mm (aorta) and a 23mm (brachiocephalic
artery - BCA) single-loop microscopy surface coil was used. Images were
acquired 2 hours after intravenous administration of an elastin-binding
contrast agent (ESMA) (0.2mmol/kg). Acquisition
parameters for the aorta and BCA are summarized in Fig 1B-1C, respectively. Flow cytometry: Monocyte characterization was performed using specific antibodies for F4/80,
CD115 and Ly6C. Histology: Verhoeff
Van Gieson elastic stain and tropoelastin immunohistochemistry (IHC) were used to
examine elastin remodeling and Ki67 IHC was used for assessment of cell proliferation.
In
vitro: Migration of primary VSMCs was evaluated by using the scrape-injury
model and proliferation using Ki67 immunofluorescence.Results
LGE-MR
images of the aorta after injection of Gd-ESMA are shown in Fig 2A. Increased contrast uptake (Fig 2B) and aortic (R1) vessel wall
relaxation rate (Fig 2C) were observed
in mice fed a high-fat-diet (HFD) that had undergone vascular injury compared
to the HFD and control groups. Importantly, HFD-injured mice treated with minocycline
showed decreased Gd-ESMA uptake, suggesting a reduction of elastin remodeling (Fig 2B-2C) compared with untreated
mice. Histology (Fig 2D) showed elastin remodeling in
the HFD-injury group (Fig 2E3)
but not in minocycline-treated group (Fig
2E4). To investigate the systemic effect of focal vascular
injury on distal atherosclerosis progression we evaluated plaque formation in
the brachiocephalic artery (BCA). LGE-MRI images of the BCA after
injection of Gd-ESMA are shown in Fig
3A. Greater enhancement and increased R1 relaxation rate was detected in
the BCA (Fig 3B) in the HFD-injury
group compared with HFD alone and the control groups (Fig 3C), suggesting that vascular injury accelerates atherosclerosis
in distal vessel segments compared with HFD alone. Mice treated with minocycline showed decreased Gd-ESMA uptake (Fig 3B-3C) compared to the untreated
groups. Histological analysis showed
increased elastin remodeling in the HFD-injury group compared with the HFD
group (Fig 3E2 and 3E3) but reduced elastin
remodeling in the minocycline-treated group (Fig 3E4).
To understand the cellular
effects of minocycline, we analysed tissue monocytes by flow cytometry (Fig 4A and 4D). HFD-injured mice showed increased recruitment of inflammatory
Ly6Chigh monocytes in both the aorta and distally in the BCA compared
with HFD mice. When injured mice were treated with minocycline they showed significantly
less monocyte recruitment in both vascular segments compared to the untreated
mice (Fig 4B and 4E). Importantly, there was a shift in
monocyte subpopulations, from Ly6Chigh to Ly6Clow in the
aorta and an even more pronounced shift in the BCA after minocycline-treatment (Fig 4C and 4F). Additionally, we
evaluated the effect of minocycline on the migration and proliferation of VSMCs.
In vitro VSMC migration was
stimulated when the cells were treated with low density lipoproteins (LDL), an inflammatory-rich
medium collected from M1 macrophages or the combination of both. However, VSMC migration
was reduced when cells were treated with minocycline (Fig 5A-5B), suggesting that minocycline decreases the inflammatory response
triggered by LDL and/or M1 macrophages. Finally, minocycline reduced the
percentage of VSCM proliferation both in
vitro (Fig 5C) and in vivo (Fig 5D). Conclusion
We demonstrate that focal vascular
injury accelerates atherosclerosis in distal vessel segments through a systemic
response driven by monocytes. Minocycline treatment alters elastin remodeling
and retards intimal thickening both at the site of vascular injury and distally
by changing the phenotype of both monocytes and VSMCs.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1Dimitry, A. C. Cardiology in review. 2013;
2Ohshima,
S. JACC. 2010. 3Shahzad,
K. Atherosclerosis. 2011. 4Phinikaridou A. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013.
5Makowski, M.R. Nature
Medicine. 2011. 6Botnar, R.M. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014. 7Protti, A. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. 8Lavin, B. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015.