Omkar B. Ijare1, Athena Hoppe1, Cole Holan1, Martyn A Sharpe1, David S Baskin1, and Kumar Pichumani1
1Kenneth R. Peak Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Ketogenic diet has been
proposed for the adjuvant therapy in the treatment of brain tumors. The
rationale behind using ketogenic diet in the cancer treatment is the inability
of tumor mitochondria to oxidize KBs. Recent studies on ketone body metabolism
using 9L and RG2 cell lines and glioma models suggest that brain tumor
mitochondria are capable of oxidizing ketone bodies. The current study was undertaken
to determine relative utilization of betahydroxy-butyrate (BHB) and glucose in patient-derived
glioblastoma cells. Our findings clearly indicate that human brain tumor cells are fully capable of oxidizing ketone bodies even under
normoglycemic conditions.
Introduction
Warburg hypothesized that tumor cells have defective mitochondria and
they heavily depend on glycolysis for their energy needs. It is well-known that
normal brain cells metabolize ketone bodies (KBs) under hypoglycemic conditions.
It has been postulated that brain tumor
cells lack the ability to metabolize KBs. Based on above hypotheses, ketogenic
diet (KD) has been proposed for the adjuvant therapy in the treatment of brain
tumors [1]. KD, composed of high fat, low carbohydrate, and moderate protein, produces
high levels of KBs in the circulation, and it is thought that defective
mitochondria would not metabolize KBs and tumor cells would starve to death. Recent
studies performed in rat cell lines/glioma models revealed that some tumor cells
are capable of oxidizing KBs [2, 3]. These results contradict the hypothesis that
brain tumors lack the ability to metabolize KBs. Cerebral ketone body
metabolism differs between rodents and humans [4]. In the current study, we are investigating
simultaneous oxidation of ketone body (betahydroxy-butyrate, BHB) and glucose
in patient-derived glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines using 13C-NMR
based isotopomer analysis.Methods
GBM tumor tissues were collected from patients undergoing craniotomy at
the Houston Methodist Hospital following an approved IRB protocol. Cells were
extracted from the tumor tissue and were initially grown in Dulbecco’s modified
Eagle’s medium (DMEM) incubated at 37°C under humidified
air with 5% CO2. Final 3 hours, the cells were grown in the DMEM
media containing 4 mM [2,4-13C]betahydroxy-butyrate ([2,4-13C]BHB)
and 6.0 mM [U-13C]glucose. After 3 hours, the media was removed, cells
were washed with PBS buffer and the cell pellets were snap-frozen in liquid
nitrogen. Prior to NMR data collection, the cell pellets were extracted in 5% perchloric
acid, extracts were lyophilized and was reconstituted in 180 µL D2O
containing 1.0 mM DSS-d6 (pH = 7.4). The sample-solution was transferred to a 3-mm
NMR tube, and 1H and 1H-decoupled 13C NMR spectra
were collected on a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 5-mm cryo-probe
optimized for direct 13C detection.Results
Figure 1 is a schematic showing metabolism of [2,4-13C]BHB
and [U-13C]glucose in a tumor cell. [2,4-13C]BHB is
converted to [2,4-13C]acetoacetate by the enzyme BHB dehydrogenase, and
further metabolized to [2-13C]acetyl-CoA. On the other hand, [U-13C]glucose
is converted to [U-13C]pyruvate via glycolysis which generates [1,2-13C]acetyl-CoA
through pyruvate dehydrogenase. [2-13C]acetyl-CoA enters the TCA
cycle, condenses with unlabeled oxaloacetate to form [4-13C] labeled
α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) and glutamate in the first turn of the cycle. After
multiple turns of the cycle, carbons 3 and 4 of α-KG and glutamate are 13C-labeled.
[U-13C]glucose-derived [1,2-13C]acetyl-CoA,
in the first turn of the TCA cycle, forms 4- and 5- 13C-labeled α-KG and glutamate. After multiple turns of
the cycle, 3, 4, and 5 carbons of α-KG and glutamate are 13C-labeled.
Figure 2 shows the portion of the 13C NMR spectrum of C4 signal of glutamate
with various multiplicities. The singlet (S) and the doublet (D34) are due to [4-13C]glutamate
and [3,4-13C]glutamate respectively, which are derived from the
metabolism of [2,4-13C]BHB. Doublet
(D45) and the quartet (Q) are due [4,5-13C]glutamate, and [3,4,5-13C]glutamate
respectively, which are derived from [U-13C]glucose. Figure 3 shows
a chart of normalized peak areas of S, D34, D45 and Q peaks of C4-glutamate
signal. The relative contribution of BHB and glucose to C4 glutamate signal is
determined as follows: In C4 glutamate
carbon multiplets, the sum of S and D34 is a measure of [2,4-13C]BHB,
whereas the sum of D45 and Q is a measure of [U-13C]glucose. From the 13C-isotomer analysis, we
found that the relative contributions of [2,4-13C]BHB and [U-13C]glucose
to the C4 glutamate 13C fractional enrichment were 42.60% and 57.40% respectively.Discussion
KDs are under clinical trials [1] for the adjuvant therapy for the
treatment of brain tumors. The rationale behind using KDs in the cancer
treatment is the inability of tumor mitochondria to oxidize KBs. Ketone body
metabolism in rat cell lines/glioma models [2,3] revealed that brain tumor mitochondria
are capable of oxidizing KB. Results from the current study using
patient-derived tumor cell lines clearly indicate that human GBMs are fully
capable of oxidizing KB in the presence of glucose.Conclusion
Our findings show that human GBM oxidize BHB even under normoglycemic
conditions.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Donna and Kenneth R. Peak
Foundation, The Kenneth R. Peak Brain and Pituitary Tumor Treatment Center at
Houston Methodist Hospital, The Taub Foundation, The John S. Dunn Foundation, The
Blanche Green Estate Fund of the Pauline Sterne Wolff Memorial Foundation, The
Verelan Foundation, The Houston Methodist Hospital Foundation, The American
Brain Tumor Association, and by many brave patients and families who have been
impacted by the devastating effects of brain cancers and central nervous system
disease. We thank Sophie Lopez for helping with cell culture experiments.References
-
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03160599
(Accessed November 8, 2017)
- Feyter HM, Behar KL, Rao JU et al.,
Neuro-Oncology, (2016) 18:1079- 1087.
- Eloqayli H, Melo TM, Haukvik A, Sonnewald
U. Neurochem Res (2011) 36:1566-1573.
- Morris AA. J Inherit Metab Dis. (2005)
28:109-121.