Luca Vizioli1, Lars Muckli2, Federico Di Martino3, and Essa Yacoub1
1CMRR, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 3Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
Synopsis
fMRI
has limited spatial accuracy due to the vascular nature of the signal source.
At high fields, sub-millimeter functional images can be acquired with the hopes
of investigating cortical columns and/or layers. The efforts to improve the
spatial accuracy of the signals tends to be focused on the acquisition side,
rather than the analysis side. Here, we explore the use of multi-voxel pattern
analysis as a means to circumvent the apparent spatial specificity limits of
ultra-high field fMRI.
Introduction
At
ultra-high field, functional voxels can span the sub-millimetre range,
measuring 0.8 mm3 (e.g. 1). These super-high-resolution images allow
recording blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD – 2) responses at the level
of some of the most fundamental units of neural computation: cortical layers
and columns. Such a sub-millimeter resolution however is only nominal in nature
as a number of factors – including voxel blurring along the phase encode
direction and proximity to large draining vessels – limit the spatial acuity of
functional voxels. Studies investigating the functional spatial precision of a single voxel at 7T, using
gradient echo BOLD contrast, have shown that it spreads beyond the millimeter
range, with an upper limit of ~2 mm (3). Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis (MVPA)
may provide a means for retrieving a spatial precision in high field GE BOLD
fMRI that goes beyond that available at the single voxel level. Here, we directly measure the spatial acuity afforded
by MVPA at 7T, by analyzing cortical depth dependent feed-forward and feed-back
signals elicited by natural scenes in V1. Methods
Functional
scans were recorded from 4 subjects using GE-EPI at high resolution (isotropic
0.8 mm3, TE = 17 ms, maximum flip angle =85°, slices = 38, TR= 2000
ms, FOV=128 x 128 mm2, matrix: 160 x 160, IPAT = 2, partial Fourier
= 6/8, pixel bandwidth = 1375 Hz/pixel) on a 7 Tesla scanner. After manually
segmenting the cortex, we parcellated the cortical sheet into 6 equally spaced
depths, ranging from 10% to 90% distance from the Pial surface. We analyzed
feed-back and feed-forward signals triggered by images of natural scenes in V1
defined using standard polar retinotopic mapping (1). To isolate feed-back
activity, retinal input was blocked by occluding
the bottom right hand quadrant of the image stimuli (4). All analyses were
confined within the cortical representation of the stimuli’s bottom right hand
quadrant. We determined the information scale exploited by SVM by
artificially misaligning the pattern structure in increasing spatial steps and
investigating the breakdown of the MVPA classifier performance. Specifically, we trained SVM classifiers independently for
each cortical depth in V1. We then simulated
different extents of misalignment by
parametrically shifting a test ROI from zero to five voxels and measured the
impact of this artificial misalignment on decoding accuracy. We performed 2
types of artificial misalignment: 1) “volumetric misalignment”, where the
test ROI was misaligned along all dimensions, allowing it to trespass into neighboring
depths in volume space; 2) “surface grid driven misalignment”, where
misalignment occurred only along an iso-depth cortical surface grid. Results
SVM classification for the original un-shifted ROI was
significant at each depth for each subject (permutation tested at 5%; no
corrections) during feed-forward stimulation of V1, and only for the 2
superficial depths (10% and 26% distance from the Pial surface) during
feed-back. In both misalignment regimes, as little as one voxel shift led to a
significant decrease in SVM accuracy (p<.05) across all cortical depths. We further
observed that, while for the volumetric misalignment >4 voxels shift was
required for the SVM accuracy to drop to chance level, in the surface grid driven regime, one voxel shift
caused SVM accuracy to be at chance.
Discussion
The
finding that one voxel shift leads to a significant impairment in decoding accuracy
indicates that a multi-voxel pattern of activity carries information that is
precise to at least the nominal resolution of single voxels, 0.8 mm in this
case.
We
argue that our results suggest that MVPA can in fact retrieve finer-grained
information compared to that offered by a single voxel’s BOLD precision. Importantly,
the comparable impact of misalignment across cortical depths suggests that the
impact of large draining vessels, that are prominent in proximity of the Pial
surface and are known to compromise the acuity of single voxels, do not, in this
case, significantly impact the spatial specificity of multi-voxel pattern of
BOLD response. The
findings presented here have strong implications for high resolution fMRI
studies, suggesting that tailored analytical approaches could help overcome
limitations in the specificity of the functional signals and permit studying
the mesoscale organization of the human brain with higher sensitivities.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Muckli L., De
Martino, F., Vizioli L., Petro L.S., Smith, F.W., Ugurbil, K., Goebel,
R. & Yacoub, E. (2015). Contextual feedback to superficial layers of
V1. Current Biology.
2.
Ogawa, S., Tank, D. W., Menon, R., Ellermann,
J. M., Kim, S.-G., Merkle, H., & Ugurbil, K. (1992). Intrinsic signal
changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with
magnetic resonance imaging. PNAS
3.
Shmuel, A., Yacoub, E., Chaimow, D., Logothetis, N.K., Uğurbil, K., 2007.
Spatiotemporal point-spread function of fMRI signal in human gray matter at 7
Tesla. Neuroimage.
4.
Smith, F.W., and Muckli, L. (2010). Nonstimulated early visual areas carry
information about surrounding context. PNAS.