Na Zhang1, Lin Jia2, Jinhao Lyu3, Lei Zhang1, Wenxiao Jia2, Hairong Zheng1, and Xin Liu1
1Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, shenzhen, China, 2XinJiang Medical University, Urumchi, China, 3Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Intracranial and carotid atherosclerotic plaques are responsible for
about 75% of ischemic stroke, the leading cause of mortality and morbidity
worldwide. A 3D intra- and extra-cranial arterial vessel wall joint imaging was
developed for simultaneously evaluating intracranial and carotid arterial
plaques. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical potential of the 3D joint
imaging technique in a large-scale patients with recent cerebrovascular
symptoms. In general, this joint imaging method allows satisfactory image
quality and comprehensive evaluation of atherosclerotic disease, and it has
great potential to be used for optimizing treatment.
Introduction
Stroke remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and
ischemic stroke accounts for about 80% of the cases. The major underlying cause
of ischemic stroke is atherosclerosis, and intracranial and carotid atherosclerotic
plaques are responsible for about 75% of ischemic stroke. High resolution
vessel wall magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can directly visualize the
vessel wall and has demonstrated the potential to characterize plaque features
which are intimately associated with recent clinical events [1-4]. Recently, a three
dimensional (3D) intra- and extra-cranial arterial vessel wall joint imaging
was developed at 3.0 T MR system based on T1-weighted 3D variable-flip-angle
turbo spin-echo sequence (SPACE) combined with delay alternating with nutation
for tailored excitation (DANTE) module [5]. This joint imaging method can simultaneously
assess intracranial and carotid arterial plaques with improved cerebrospinal fluid and blood suppression, large spatial
coverage and time-saving than current SPACE protocols which using multiple
scans to cover all frequently affected vascular locations. However, a
large-scale clinical evaluation of the technique has yet to be conducted,
particularly in patients with cerebrovascular ischemic events. The aim of this
study was to assess the clinical potential of the newly developed intra- and
extra-cranial arterial vessel wall joint imaging technique in patients with intra- and/or extra-cranial
atherosclerosis disease.Materials and Methods
This prospective study was approved by the local
institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients
before MR imaging. From April 2016 through September 2017 in a single
imaging center, 55 consecutive patients with clinically confirmed recent cerebrovascular
symptoms (46 males, ages 13- 69, mean 45.53±12.06 years) were recruited to underwent 3D intra-
and extra-cranial arterial vessel wall joint imaging with and without contrast
enhancement on a 3T MR system (MAGNETOM TIM Trio, Siemens Medical Solution, Germany).
Exclusion criteria included general contraindications to MR examination and a
renal clearance of < 30 mL/min. A custom designed 32-channel head (24
channels) and neck (4 channels on each side) coil was used for signal
reception. All subjects were placed head first and in a supine position. The
foam padding was used to immobilize the head to prevent movement. Relevant
imaging parameters were: spatial resolution = 0.55 × 0.55 × 0.55 mm3
without interpolation, sagittal orientation, GRAPPA 2, scan time 9 min 6 sec. Image
quality based on a four point score, number of plaques and culprit plaque according
to Qiao et al [6] were evaluated in consensus by two radiologists (L. J. and J.
L.) with more than 6-year experience in vascular MR.Results
All patients successfully underwent MR scans with and without contrast
agent. Characteristics of the 55 patients were detailed in Table 1. The image quality scores for intracranial internal
carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA), basilar artery (BA) and
vertebral artery (VA), and extracranial carotid artery (CA) were summarized in Table 2. There was no significant
difference between pre and post contrast vessel wall MR images (p > 0.05). Except
3 dissection (Figure 1), 2 moyamoya,
2 vasculitis, and 5 who
had no obvious cause or atherosclerotic plaque formation, 150 plaques were detected
in 43 patients with multiple plaques found in 36 patients (84%) (range 1 to 8 plaques,
mean 3.56 plaques per patient). Of which, 122 (81%) and 28 (19%) plaques were identified
in intracranial and extracranial arteries, respectively. The culprit plaques
were also identified for all 43 patients with atherosclerotic plauqes. 63 (100%
enhanced) and 22 (79% enhanced) culprit plaques were identified in intracranial
and extracranial arteries, respectively. A culprit plaque with its downstream
infarction is shown in Figure 2.Discussion and Conclusion
In general, the intra- and extra-cranial arterial vessel wall joint
imaging allows satisfactory image quality for the delineation of vessel wall
and provides large spatial coverage of common sites of atherosclerosis
formation. The combined 3D imaging
technique allows comprehensive evaluation of atherosclerotic disease in intra
and extracranial arteries. This combined 3D MR imaging method has the ability
to classify ischemic stroke etiology subtype and identify culprit plaques for
both intra- and extracranial arteries. In conclusion, this joint imaging is a
promising vessel wall MR imaging method for comprehensive diagnosis of cerebrovascular
symptoms and investigation of etiology, and has great
potential to be used for optimizing treatment.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0100100), and Key Laboratory for Magnetic Resonance and Multimodality Imaging of
Guangdong Province (2014B030301013).References
[1] Fan Z et al. MRM
2017; 77(3):1142-1150.
[2] Qiao Y et al. JMRI
2011; 34:22-30.
[3] van der Kolk AG et
al. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23:2996-3004.
[4] Zhang N et al. MRI
2017; 39:89-97.
[5] Zhang L et al. MRI
2017; 44:65-71.
[6] Qiao Y et al.
Radiology 2014; 271(2):534-542.