Quantitative MRI (qMRI) assessment of tibiofemoral articular cartilage was performed in 13 WNT1 mutation-positive (MP) subjects and 13 mutation-negative (MN) controls. Cartilage thickness, T2 and T1r relaxation times, and texture features contrast, homogeneity and dissimilarity of T2 maps were determined in six regions of interests. Texture features demonstrated an opposing trend with age between the two groups in medial tibiofemoral cartilage, suggesting a possible age-related cartilage preservation in MP subjects. Similar differences were not observed in the other qMRI parameters, suggesting that texture analysis is a more sensitive and accurate tool for quantitative cartilage assessment than mere mean relaxation time measurements.
The cohort comprised 13 mutation-positive
(MP, age range 17-76 years) and 13 mutation-negative (MN, age range 16-77 years)
subjects from two Finnish families with autosomal dominant WNT1 osteoporosis
due to a heterozygous missense mutation c.652T>G (p.C218G) in WNT1. All the subjects were imaged using
a 3.0T MRI unit (Siemens Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany); the protocol
included morphological sequences, and T2 and T1r
mapping. The imaging parameters are presented in Table 1. The articular
cartilage was manually segmented into six regions of interest (ROIs): lateral
and medial anterior central femur (acFL and acFM), lateral and medial posterior
central femur (pcFL and pcFM) and lateral and medial central tibia (cTL and
cTM) (Figure 1). Cartilage thickness, T2 and T1r
relaxation times, and T2 texture features contrast,
dissimilarity and homogeneity were assessed in each ROI. Morphological
assessment of the tibiofemoral joint was conducted using Park scoring system2
for MR images. Differences in
relaxation times and texture features between MP and MN groups were assessed using
Mann-Whitney non-parametric test. The effect of the mutation status on
age-relaxation time correlation and age-texture feature correlation was
analyzed using linear regression analysis. The correlation was presented as
scatter plots and the regression lines of MP and MN groups were compared using
Z-score.
1. Laine CM, Joeng KS, Campeau PM, Kiviranta R, Tarkkonen K, Grover M, et al. WNT1 mutations in early-onset osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 9;368(19):1809-16.
2. Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Park JY, Choi YJ, et al. A practical MRI grading system for osteoarthritis of the knee: association with Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic scores. Eur J Radiol. 2013 Jan;82(1):112-7.
3. Carballido-Gamio J, Stahl R, Blumenkrantz G, Romero A, Majumdar S, Link TM. Spatial analysis of magnetic resonance T1rho and T2 relaxation times improves classification between subjects with and without osteoarthritis. Med Phys. 2009 Sep;36(9):4059-67.
4. Joseph GB, Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, Nardo L, Virayavanich W, Alizai H, et al. Texture analysis of cartilage T2 maps: individuals with risk factors for OA have higher and more heterogeneous knee cartilage MR T2 compared to normal controls--data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R153.
5. Peuna A, Hekkala J, Haapea M, Podlipska J, Guermazi A, Saarakkala S, et al. Variable angle gray level co-occurrence matrix analysis of T2 relaxation time maps reveals degenerative changes of cartilage in knee osteoarthritis: Oulu knee osteoarthritis study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov 1.
6. Baum T, Joseph GB, Nardo L, Virayavanich W, Arulanandan A, Alizai H, et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging-based knee cartilage T2 measurements and focal knee lesions with body mass index: thirty-six-month followup data from a longitudinal, observational multicenter study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Jan;65(1):23-33.
7. McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Jul;51(7):844-9.
8. Widuchowski W, Widuchowski J, Trzaska T. Articular cartilage defects: study of 25,124 knee arthroscopies. Knee. 2007 Jun;14(3):177-82.
9. Lammentausta E, Kiviranta P, Toyras J, Hyttinen MM, Kiviranta I, Nieminen MT, et al. Quantitative MRI of parallel changes of articular cartilage and underlying trabecular bone in degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Oct;15(10):1149-57.
10. Franklin J, Englund M, Ingvarsson T, Lohmander S. The association between hip fracture and hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Nov 26;11:274,2474-11-274.
Table 1. MRI parameters used for Park-grading and quantitative MRI study protocol.
Figure 1. Sagittal T2-weighted image of tibiofemoral joint in a 37-year-old mutation-negative female. Studied regions of interest are marked with blue (anterior central femur), red (posterior central femur) and green (central tibia) color.
Figure 2. Contrast dependency on subject age for 13 mutation-positive (MP) and 13 mutation-negative (MN) subjects with a heterozygous WNT1 mutation p.C218G. Regression lines for both groups are displayed. P-value indicates the difference of the regression coefficients. The medial compartment demonstrates inverse setting of MP and MN groups, suggesting possible age-related cartilage preservation in the MP group. Results are presented separately for different regions of interest: acF = anterior central femur, pcF = posterior central femur, cT =central tibia, in medial (M) and lateral (L) condyles.