Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution (MT-CSD) can simultaneously estimate the full white matter fiber orientation distribution function (fODF) and the apparent densities of cerebrospinal fluid and grey matter from multi-shell diffusion MRI data, making it an attractive option for clinical and neuroscientific studies. Unfortunately, MT-CSD at high spatial resolution is challenging due to scan time and signal-to-noise ratio constraints. We propose a new MT-CSD approach that enables super-resolution estimation from multiple thick-sliced data sets with varying slice orientation. Using data acquired on a clinical scanner, we demonstrate high-quality tissue density maps and fODFs at 1×1×1mm3 spatial resolution in under 10 minutes.
MT-CSD at native resolution: MT-CSD is typically performed voxel-wise and can be formulated as a constrained linear least squares problem of the form1:
$$\hat{\mathbf{x}}=\text{arg}\min\limits_{\mathbf{x}}\,\lVert\mathbf{C}\mathbf{x}−\mathbf{y}\rVert_2^2\quad\text{subject to}\quad\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x}\ge\mathbf{0}$$
where $$$\mathbf{C}$$$ is the forward spherical convolution matrix relating the vectors of unknown multi-tissue fODF spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients, $$$\mathbf{x}$$$, to the vector of measured dMRI signal intensities, $$$\mathbf{y}$$$; and $$$\mathbf{A}$$$ is the constraint matrix relating the multi-tissue fODF SH coefficients $$$\mathbf{x}$$$ to their amplitudes, effectively imposing non-negativity of the tissue densities.
Super resolution reconstruction: Super-resolution reconstruction is the process of producing a high-resolution image from a sequence of low-resolution images, where each low-resolution image samples the high-resolution scene in a distinct fashion2. In the context of dMRI, acquiring data with thick slices, results in reduced acquisition time and increased SNR; the loss of resolution along the slice direction can be recovered by combining multiple thick-sliced data sets with different slice orientations using super-resolution reconstruction3,4 (see Fig. 1).
Super-resolution MT-CSD: The above equation can be extended to support volume-wise super-resolution estimation of multi-tissue fODFs as follows:
$$\hat{\mathbf{x}}^\prime=\text{arg}\min\limits_{\mathbf{x^\prime}}\,\lVert\mathbf{S}\mathbf{C}^\prime\mathbf{x}^\prime−\mathbf{y}^\prime\rVert_2^2\quad\text{subject to}\quad\mathbf{A}^\prime\mathbf{x}^\prime\ge\mathbf{0}$$
where $$$\mathbf{C}^\prime$$$ is the volume-wise forward convolution matrix and $$$\mathbf{S}$$$ is the super-resolution sampling matrix, relating the signal intensities expected in all high-resolution voxels to the acquired signal intensities in all low-resolution voxels, $$$\mathbf{y}^\prime$$$; and $$$\mathbf{A}^\prime$$$ is the volume-wise constraint matrix. The super-resolution matrix $$$\mathbf{S}$$$ takes into account motion, geometric transformation, blurring, and down-sampling and is implemented efficiently using a set of shear transformations5. The sheer size of the problem and constraint matrices precludes the use of standard quadratic programming solvers. Instead, we employ a majorize-minimize algorithm to decouple the voxel-wise constrained spherical deconvolution problem from the volume-wise super resolution problem6. To improve the conditioning of the super-resolution problem without blurring fine details, we complement the above equation with a small total variation penalty.
Acquisition: 5 dMRI data sets with high in-plane resolution and thick slices (voxel size 1×1×3mm3) were acquired on a 3T MAGNETOM Prisma with a 32-channel head coil array (Fig.1). Each data set was acquired with a unique slice orientation = [-72°,-36°,0°,36°,72°], and a unique set of 26 q-space samples (b = [0,700,1200,2800] s/mm2, distributed over 2, 3, 8 and 13 directions, respectively)7, resulting in a total of 130 unique q-space samples (TR/TE = 4300/90 ms/ms, partial-Fourier = 6/8, iPAT = 2 (GRAPPA), SMS = 2, and bandwidth = 1196 Hz/pix). Total acquisition time was just under 10 minutes.
1. Jeurissen, B., Tournier, J.-D., Dhollander, T., Connelly, A. & Sijbers, J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 103, 411–426 (2014).
2. Greenspan, H., Oz, G., Kiryati, N. & Peled, S. MRI inter-slice reconstruction using super-resolution. Magn. Reson. Imaging 20, 437–446 (2002).
3. Scherrer, B., Gholipour, A. & Warfield, S. K. Super-resolution reconstruction to increase the spatial resolution of diffusion weighted images from orthogonal anisotropic acquisitions. Med. Image Anal. 16, 1465–1476 (2012).
4. Van Steenkiste, G. et al. Super-resolution reconstruction of diffusion parameters from diffusion-weighted images with different slice orientations. Magn. Reson. Med. 75, 181–195 (2016).
5. Poot, D. H. J., Van Meir, V. & Sijbers, J. General and efficient super-resolution method for multi-slice MRI. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 13, 615–622 (2010).
6. Muckley, M. J., Noll, D. C. & Fessler, J. A. Fast parallel MR image reconstruction via B1-based, adaptive restart, iterative soft thresholding algorithms (BARISTA). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34, 578–588 (2015).
7. Caruyer, E., Lenglet, C., Sapiro, G. & Deriche, R. Design of multishell sampling schemes with uniform coverage in diffusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 69, 1534–1540 (2013).
8. Uğurbil, K. et al. Pushing spatial and temporal resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 80–104 (2013).
9. Calamante, F., Jeurissen, B., Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D. & Connelly, A. The role of whole-brain diffusion MRI as a tool for studying human in vivo cortical segregation based on a measure of neurite density. Magn. Reson. Med. (2017). doi:10.1002/mrm.26917
10. Sotiropoulos, S. N. et al. RubiX: combining spatial resolutions for Bayesian inference of crossing fibers in diffusion MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32, 969–982 (2013).
11. Dhollander, T., Smith, R. E., Tournier, J. D., Jeurissen, B. & Connelly, A. Time to move on: an FOD-based DEC map to replace DTI’s trademark DEC FA. in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23, 1027 (2015).