Diffusion as a Biomarker for Brain Disease
Koji Sakai1

1Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan

Synopsis

This session focuses on and tries to appraise diffusion MRI (dMRI)-derived imaging biomarkers (dMRI-IB) for brain disease. To categorize dMRI-IB: 1) confirm the definition of IB; 2) proceed through dMRI-derived measures and applications; 3) introduce the possible candidate of dMRI-IB; and 4) discuss about barriers that dMRI-IB candidates should overcome. In addition, this session will address following issues: 1) why only limited dMRI measures can be considered for IB? 2) what is the problem for dMRI-IB candidates to become true IB? 3) what can we do for creating new IB?

Purpose

Several decades have passed since diffusion MRI (dMRI) was established.

This session will address whether the dMRI derived measures can be considered as biomarkers.

Contents

To outline whether the dMRI derived measures can be used as biomarkers: I will

1) confirm the definition of biomarker [1, 2], especially an “imaging biomarker (IB)” [3, 4];

2) review the dMRI derived measures and their common clinical applications [5, 6, 7, 8];

3) introduce the candidates of dMRI-IB for brain diseases; and

4) discuss about the dMRI parameters that can be useful to define IB?

Definition of Imaging Biomarker

The definition of biomarker was proposed by FDA [1] in 2001 as follows:

“a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention.”

The definition of “imaging biomarker” was proposed by QIBA (RSNA) [4] in 2015 as follows:

“an objective characteristic derived from an in vivo image measured on a ratio or interval scale as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or a response to a therapeutic intervention”. Imaging biomarker can be divided four different purposes [9]:

diagnosis/prognosis, monitoring, predictive, response.

dMRI derived measures are now utilizing these four purposes.

dMRI measures

Since dMRI was established [10], dMRI derived measures and their applications have been developed and widely spread from brain to whole body.

Well-known dMRI derived measurement methods are as follows:

DWI [11], IVIM [11], QSI [12], DTI [13], DSI [14], HARDI [15], QBI [16], CHARMED [17], DKI [18], AxCaliber [19], NODDI [20], etc. dMRI derived measurements are: ADC [11] by DWI; ADC, FA [21], and tractography by DTI [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27], by DSI [28], and by QBI [29]; MK by DKI [18]; MD, MK, and ZDP by QSI [30]; and NDIODI (orientation dispersion index), vin (intra-neurite tissue volume fraction), a (neurite density index), and viso (isotropic volume fraction) by NODDI [31].

Among these dMRI derived measurements, which one is recognized as an imaging biomarker?

Clinical applications

For clinically typical brain diseases, such as ischemia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [35-37], and traumatic brain injury (TBI) [38-43], dMRI derived measures have been extensively studied.

For the diagnosis of ischemic stroke, clinical utility of DWI and ADC have been studied [32].For the treatment of acute phase of ischemic stroke, diffusion-perfusion mismatch has been also studied [33] and clinically utilized [34].

Requirements for dMRI-IB

dMRI-IB candidates can be divided into two major categories [44].

Those are the “clinical research tool” and “decision making tool”.

To make it become a “clinical research tool”, we typically have to confirm only the possibility and applicability. On the other hands, “decision making tool” is required to fit the definition of IB through major study with attention to evidence-based medicine [45].

Therefore, to create and apply a new dMRI-IB, the candidate parameters should fulfill a stepwise process of “validation”, “qualification”, and “utilization”.

We need to recognize the difference between these two categories and select appropriate tool for our purpose.

Conclusion

As take home messages, learners can recognize:

1) some dMRI derived measures have already been used as biomarkers for certain brain diseases,

2) dMRI-IB candidates can be divided into two categories,

3) we need multi-center collaboration for creating new dMRI-IB to clarify “validation”, “qualification”, and “utilization”.

Continuous effort by interdisciplinary team (medical, informatics, engineering, etc.) may create a better dMRI-IB.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DrugDevelopmentToolsQualificationProgram/ucm284395.htm. [2] Biomarkers Definitions Working Group, Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001; 69: 89–95. [3] Kessler LG, et al., Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2015, Vol. 24(1) 9–26 [4] https://www.rsna.org/QIBA.aspx [5] Dong Q, et al., J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19: 6-8. [6] Yamada K, et al., Magn Reson Med Sci, 2009, 8: 165-174. [7] Forghani R, et al., Springer Science+Business Media, 2011. [8] Tsien C, et al., Semin Radiat Oncol, 2014, 24: 218–226. [9] Waterton J, ISMRM 2008, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. [10] Le Bihan D, EMBO Molecular Medicine 2014: 6(5); 569-573 [11] LeBihan D, et al., Radiology, 1986, 161: 401-407. [12] Callaghan PT, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, ISBN 978-0-19-853997-1. [13] Basser PJ, et al., Biophys. J., 1994, 66: 259-267. [14] Wedeen VJ, et al., ISMRM 2000, Denver, Colorado, USA. [15] Frank LR, Magn Reson Med, 2002, 47: 1083-1099. [16] Tuch DS, et al., Magn Reson Med, 2002, 48: 577-582. [17] Assaf Y, et al., Magn Reson Med, 2004, 52: 965-978. [18] Jensen JH, et al., Magn Reson Med, 2005, 53: 1432-1440. [19] Assaf Y, et al., Magn Reson Med, 2008, 59: 1347-1354. [20] Zhang H, et al., Neuroimage, 2012, 61: 1000-1016. [21] Basser PJ, NMR Biomed, 8: 333-344. [22] Wedeen VJ, et al., International Conference for Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, 1995, Paris, France. [23] Basser PJ,ISMRM 1998, Sydney, Australia. [24] Conturo TE, et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 10422-10427. [25] Jones DK, et al., Magn Reson Med, 1999, 42: 37-41. [26] Mori S, et al., Ann Neurol, 1999, 45: 265-269. [27] Poupon C, et al., ISMRM 1999, Philadelphia, USA. [28] Wedeen VJ, et al., Neuroimage, 2008, 41: 1267-1277. [29] Tuch DS, Magn Reson Med, 2004, 52: 1358-1372. [30] Assaf Y, et al., Magn Reson Med, 2002, 47: 115-126. [31] Colgan N, et al., Neuroimage, 2016, 125: 739-744. [32] Schaefer PW, Radiology, 2000, 217: 311-345. [33] Keir SL, Stroke, 2000, 31: 2723-2731. [34] Chen F, at al., World J Radiol, 2012, 4: 63-74. [35] Weston PSJ, et al., Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2015, 7:47 [36] Amlien IK, et al., Neuroscience, 2014, 276: 206-215. [37] Jack CR Jr., et al., Alzheimers Dement, 2015, 11: 740–756. [38] Hulkower MB, et al., AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013, 34: 2064-2074. [39] Reis C, et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2015, 16: 11903-11965. [40] Shenton ME, et al., Brain Imaging Behav, 2012, 6: 37–192. [41] Bigler ED, Neuropsychol Rev, 2013, 23:169–209. [42] Eierud C, et al., NeuroImage: Clinical, 2014, 4: 283–294. [43] Delouche A, et al., European Journal of Radiology, 2016, 85 : 25–30. [44] O’Connor JPB, et al., Nature Reviews, Clinical Oncology, 2016, doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.162
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)