State of the Art: Viability Sequences
Taehoon Shin

Synopsis

This talk will be presenting recent advances in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac imaging which can overcome limitations of the standard protocol based on inversion recovery segmented 2D acquisition. The advanced approaches to be discussed will include single-shot imaging with motion corrected averaging, single-breath-hold 3D imaging, free-breathing isotropic 3D imaging with respiratory, and techniques to improve scar-blood contrast and scar-fat contrast.

Standard LGE

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI has become the reference noninvasive imaging method for myocardial viability assessment due to excellent scar contrast and high spatial resolution. The standard protocols using segmented 2D acquisition over a period of single breath-hold have shown great diagnostic performance in routine clinical use, but still involve issues and limitations including poor breath-holding, arrhythmia (or R-R variation), low contrast between sub-endocardial scar and nearby blood, fat infiltration and limited resolution in the through-plane direction. This talk will present recent advances in LGE imaging which can overcome each or multiple of the limitations in the current approaches.

Advanced LGE

Single shot imaging: Compared to the segmented acquisition, single-shot imaging is faster and less sensitive to respiratory motion and arrhythmia at the cost of reduced spatial resolution. Single shot LGE may be used for covering the entire myocardium in a single breath-hold (1) or in cases of arrhythmia or poor breath-holding(2). Motion corrected averaging can be used for free-breathing scans to further reduce motion effect and enhance SNR(3).

Breath-hold 3D imaging: 3D LGE has advantages of contiguous 3D coverage which guarantees accurate quantification of scar volume, shorter total scan time due to the lack of rest periods, and higher SNR which can be traded for higher spatial resolution. While 3D LGE typically enables lower spatial resolution or longer scan time then the conventional 2D approach, non-Cartesian acquisition may be used for scan acceleration(4-7).

Free-breathing isotropic 3D imaging: Isotropic resolution 3D LGE is arguably the most desired but would be feasibly only through free-breathing scan due to excessively long scan time. The most important of technical requirements in free-breathing LGE is accurate motion estimation and compensation. Diaphragm navigator is the most established approach but with limited accuracy due to subject-dependent motion correlation between the diaphragm and heart. More accurate motion estimation directly using the signal from the heart (i.e. self-navigation) has been investigated in multiple cardiac applications (8-10). Scan acceleration is another important requirement in isotropic LGE to maintain acceptable scan time. With parallel imaging reconstruction is the default method, addition of compressed sensing appears to be promising for high-rate scan acceleration (11,12) .

Enhancing scar-blood contrast: Image contrast between subendocardial MI and nearby blood pool is often low because of similar T1 values, which makes it difficult to outline the scar boundary accurately. A useful basis for differentiation between scar and blood is difference in their T2 values. This can be utilized simply by additionally acquiring T2 weighted images at the cost of increased scan time(13). The same concept evolved into black blood LGE where an inversion recovery T2 preparation pulse well contrasts scar with blood as well as remote myocardium (14).

Distinguishing fat from scar: Intramyocardial fat may be of diagnostic value but is difficult to distinguish from MI since both have low T1 values. Fat-only images can be obtained by using multiecho readout and an iterative estimation algorithm which simultaneously solves for water, fat, and field offset (15,16).

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Huber A, Hayes C, Spannagl B, Rieber J, Klauss V, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Wintersperger BJ. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery single-shot balanced steady-state free precession for detection of myocardial infarction during a single breathhold. Acad Radiol 2007;14(12):1500-1508.

2. Sievers B, Elliott MD, Hurwitz LM, Albert TS, Klem I, Rehwald WG, Parker MA, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by subsecond, free-breathing delayed contrast-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2007;115(2):236-244.

3. Kellman P, Larson AC, Hsu LY, Chung YC, Simonetti OP, McVeigh ER, Arai AE. Motion-corrected free-breathing delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2005;53(1):194-200.

4. Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E, Rochitte CE, Wang Y, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, Wu KC. Myocardial viability: Breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology 2004;230:845-851.

5. Dewey M, Laule M, Taupitz M, Kaufels N, Hamm B, Kivelitz D. Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. Radiology 2006;239(3):703-709.

6. Shin T, Lustig M, Nishimura DG, Hu BS. Rapid single breath-hold 3D late gadolinium enhancement MRI using a stack-of-spirals acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(6):1496-1502.

7. Bauner KU, Muehling O, Theisen D, Hayes C, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Huber AM. Assessment of Myocardial Viability with 3D MRI at 3 T. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(6):1645-1650.

8. Stehning C, Börnert P, Nehrke K, Eggers H, Stuber M. Free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA with 3D radial SSFP and self-navigated image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(2):476-480.

9. Liu J, Spincemaille P, Codella NC, Nguyen TD, Prince MR, Wang Y. Respiratory and cardiac self-gated free-breathing cardiac CINE imaging with multiecho 3D hybrid radial SSFP acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2010;63(5):1230-1237.

10. Menon RG, Miller GW, Jeudy J, Rajagopalan S, Shin T. Free breathing three-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance using outer volume suppressed projection navigators. Magn Reson Med 2016;Epub(doi: 10.1002/mrm.26234).

11. Niendorf T, Sodickson DK. Parallel imaging in cardiovascular MRI: methods and applications. NMR Biomed 2006;19(3):325-341.

12. Akçakaya M, Rayatzadeh H, Basha TA, Hong SN, Chan RH, Kissinger KV, Hauser TH, Josephson ME, Manning WJ, Nezafat R. Accelerated late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR imaging with isotropic spatial resolution using compressed sensing: initial experience. Radiology 2012;264(3):691-699.

13. Kellman P, Chung Y-C, Simonetti OP, McVeigh ER, Arai AE. Multicontrast delayed enhancement provides improved contrast between myocardial infarction and blood pool. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:605-613.

14. Kellman P, Xue H, Olivieri LJ, Cross RR, Grant EK, Fontana M, Ugander M, Moon JC, Hansen MS. Dark blood late enhancement imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016;18(1):77.

15. Goldfarb JW. Fat-water separated delayed hyperenhanced myocardial infarct imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(3):503-509.

16. Kellman P, Hernando D, Shah S, Zuehlsdorff S, Jerecic R, Mancini C, Liang ZP, Arai AE. Multiecho dixon fat and water separation method for detecting fibrofatty infiltration in the myocardium. Magn Reson Med 2009;61(1):215-221.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)