Synopsis
Diabetes is a devastating disease hallmarked
by high levels of blood glucose (hyperglycemia). While blood glucose measurement is
considered a standard procedure for diabetic patients, it does not reflect a
true status of functional beta cells and cannot be used for disease monitoring
and evaluating the therapeutic response. The development of strategies for the
noninvasive assessment of molecular events associated with diabetes constitutes
an important healthcare priority. This presentation will focus on the
development of imaging agents and techniques that could provide
real time non-invasive data of biological parameters and their functions as
they relate to diabetes progression and treatment.
Diabetes
mellitus is a devastating disease hallmarked by high levels of blood glucose.
This is caused by lack of insulin production due to the death of insulin
producing beta cells, insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, or both (1) and represents a worldwide health
problem. Ststistical data show that approximately 280 million people or 6.4% of
the world population suffer from this disease. These numbers could increase to
438 million by 2030 (2;
3) causing diabetes-related healthcare costs
to rise up to 40% of the total healthcare budget in coutries with high
incidence of the disease. Aside from high blood glucose that needs to be
cotrolled on a daily basis, diabetes increases a risk for cardiovascular
disease, and is the leading cause of kidney failure, lower limb amputations,
and adult onset blindness.
In healthy
individual, insulin is secreted by the beta cells in the pancreatic islets of
Langerhans in response to a rise in blood glucose levels (for example after a
meal) and serves as a signal for glucose uptake and assimilation by peripheral
tissues. As diabetes develops, however, the body loses the capacity for insulin
production/assimilation, resulting in elevated blood glucose (hyperglycemia).
Type 1
diabetes mellitus (T1D), also known as “ juvenile” or “insulin dependent”
diabetes (IDDM), is cused by the autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta
cells by the body’s own mononuclear cells such as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Attracted
by the antigens presented by beta cells they infiltrate the islets of
Langerhans, resulting in beta cell destruction, leaving patients dependent on
exogenous insulin for survival (4). It accounts for an estimated 5%
to 10% of diabetic Americans. There is no cure for Type 1 diabetes, and the
only clinical modality that has certain success in achieveng normoglycemia in
diabetic patients is pancreatic islet transplantation. Type 2 diabetes is known
as adult-onset or noninsulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM), and is a chronic
condition that affects the way human body metabolizes glucose. With type 2
diabetes, human body either resists the effects of insulin — a hormone that
regulates the uptake of glucose into the cells — or doesn't produce enough
insulin to maintain a normal glucose level. These patients can control their
normoglycemia with a set of glocose-lowering drugs, proper diet and excersise.
While blood glucose measurement is considered a standard
procedure for diabetic patients, it does not reflect on a true status of functional
beta cells and cannot be used for disease monitoring and evaluating the therapeutic
response. Considering the remarkable toll diabetes is having in terms of human
life, it becomes clear that the development of strategies for the noninvasive
assessment of molecular events associated with this disease constitutes an
important healthcare priority. The ability to image the pathology on that scale
would be instrumental in understanding the time course of the disease,
identifying the key initiating events, and possibly designing novel therapeutic
approaches and monitoring their efficacy.
Molecular imaging, a rapidly emerging biomedical
research discipline, has a high potential to provide insights into when, why,
and how diabetes occurs, as well as to devise new ways to treat the disease.
Imaging is one of the most valuable tools for diabetes research and clinical
management since it could provide real time non-invasive data of various
biological parameters and their functions as they relate to diabetes
progression and treatment.
Accomplishing the goal of molecular imaging in diabetes,
however, presents a tremendous challenge. The underlying reasons extend both
from the unique structure and distribution of pancreatic islets and the
metabolic complexity of the disease. With respect to the first challenge,
pancreatic islets are small organ-like entities (about 100 microns in diameter)
dispersed throughout the pancreas at a low density and comprising only about
1.7% of the pancreatic volume (5). The islet itself is a complex
structure, consisting of insulin-producing beta cells, which constitute
approximately 50% of the islet, glucagon-secreting alpha cells (15-20%), delta
cells involved in somatostatin production (3-10%), and cells, which release
pancreatic polypeptide (1%). Hormone production and secretion by all of these
cells is a tightly regulated dynamic process driven by the need to respond to
ever-changing energy demands and influenced by metabolic and environmental
factors continually throughout the life of an organism. In diabetes, this
delicate functional balance is disrupted. Identifying the key cellular events,
which define the pathology of diabetes and become manifest at early enough
stages of the disease to allow intervention, is a demanding process critical
for the success of imaging.
The main event that defines diabetes progression is the
development of hyperglycemia. Therefore, the study of diabetes has focused
mainly on the insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cell, since beta-cell failure
has been implicated as a central event in the progression to hyperglycemia.
Considering the central role of the beta cell, strategies for cellular imaging
of diabetes would focus on the detection of beta cells via a variety of
markers. Various strategies have been proposed for detection of beta cells and
for estimation of a functional beta cell mass. Magnetic resonance imaging has
been applied for detection of beta cells using their intrinsic insulin/zinc
secreting properties (6-8). Other investigators focused on
utilizing manganese as a reporter for beta cell mass (9-11). Finally, targeting of beta cell
surface markers has been utilized in combination with MRI (12-16).
Autoimmune destruction of beta cells is primarily a
T-cell-mediated process. It is postulated that a loss of more than 90% of the
beta cells takes place before insulin production is no longer sufficient to
regulate blood glucose levels, resulting in hyperglycemia. Importantly, this
initial stage of insulitis begins a long time before the manifestation of overt
symptoms, persists for many years, and progressively decreases after diabetes
onset, as beta-cell mass declines (17;
18). Therefore, the early detection and
continuous monitoring of immune cell infiltration of the pancreas in real-time
would represent a significant step towards identifying the initial insult
leading to beta-cell destruction and permit effective curative and not just
palliative intervention. Potential strategies for imaging immune cell
infiltration in diabetes include antigen-specific (19;
20) and non-specific (21;
22) targeting of infiltrating cells
using iron oxide based nanoparticles.
The progression of inflammation in diabetes is associated
with changes in pancreatic islet vasculature and subsequent vasculature
dysfunction. At sites of inflammation, blood vessels become “leaky” and
allow large molecules to extravasate through the walls of the damaged vessel
into the surrounding tissue. Vascular leakage was utilized for delivering
imaging agents to the islets and showed promise for further development of
image-guided therapies (23;
24).
As mentioned above, islet transplantation has emerged as one
of the most promising new treatments for diabetes. Successful monitoring of the
stability and functionality of the graft would also permit us to test the
effectiveness of various immunosuppressive regimens, as well as islet delivery
strategies and ultimately assist the further optimization of the islet
transplantation procedure. Towards this goal several pre-clinical studies
showed the potential of labeling pancreatic islets for subsequent monitoring
after transplantation (25-33). First clinical studies showed the
potential of this method (34;
35).
Clearly,
molecular imaging can provide answers to many of the questions related to
diabetes. It offers the unprecedented potential to unravel the complex natural
history of the disease and to permit diagnosis at the earliest causative
stages, characterized by the first signs of metabolic or molecular disturbance.
Furthermore, by combining the global anatomical/physiologic scale of currently
available in vivo imaging modalities with the detailed molecular/cellular scale
of biochemistry and cell and molecular biology, molecular imaging allows the
noninvasive real-time monitoring of diabetes progression as well as response to
therapy non-invasively and in authentic physiologic environments.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Lin M, Lubag A, McGuire MJ, Seliounine SY, Tsyganov
EN, Antich PP, Sherry AD, Brown KC, Sun X: Advances in molecular imaging of
pancreatic beta cells. Front Biosci 2008;13:4558-4575
2. Shah A, Mital D:
Molecular imaging for diagnosis and management of diabetes - a review. Int J
Medical Engin Inform 2012;4:325-342
3. Shaw JE, Sicree RA,
Zimmet PZ: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87:4-14
4. Church EJ: Imaging
diabetes. Radiol Technol 2009;80:340-360
5. Butler AE, Janson
J, Bonner-Weir S, Ritzel R, Rizza RA, Butler PC: Beta-cell deficit and
increased beta-cell apoptosis in humans with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes
2003;52:102-110
6. De Leon-Rodriguez
L, Lubag AJ, Jr., Sherry AD: Imaging free zinc levels in vivo - what can be
learned? Inorganica Chim Acta 2012;393:12-23
7. Esqueda AC, Lopez
JA, Andreu-de-Riquer G, Alvarado-Monzon JC, Ratnakar J, Lubag AJ, Sherry AD, De
Leon-Rodriguez LM: A new gadolinium-based MRI zinc sensor. J Am Chem Soc
2009;131:11387-11391
8. Lubag AJ, De
Leon-Rodriguez LM, Burgess SC, Sherry AD: Noninvasive MRI of beta-cell function
using a Zn2+-responsive contrast agent. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:18400-18405
9. Antkowiak PF,
Stevens BK, Nunemaker CS, McDuffie M, Epstein FH: Manganese-enhanced magnetic
resonance imaging detects declining pancreatic beta-cell mass in a
cyclophosphamide-accelerated mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes
2013;62:44-48
10. Antkowiak PF,
Tersey SA, Carter JD, Vandsburger MH, Nadler JL, Epstein FH, Mirmira RG:
Noninvasive assessment of pancreatic beta-cell function in vivo with
manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol Endocrinoly Metabol
2009;296:E573-578
11. Antkowiak PF,
Vandsburger MH, Epstein FH: Quantitative pancreatic beta cell MRI using
manganese-enhanced Look-Locker imaging and two-site water exchange analysis.
Magn Reson Med 2012;67:1730-1739
12. Kavishwar A,
Medarova Z, Moore A: Unique sphingomyelin patches are targets of a
beta-cell-specific antibody. J Lipid Res 2011;52:1660-1671
13. Kavishwar A, Moore
A: Sphingomyelin patches on pancreatic beta-cells are indicative of insulin
secretory capacity. J Histochem Cytochem 2013;61:910-919
14. Zhang B, Yang B,
Zhai C, Jiang B, Wu Y: The role of exendin-4-conjugated superparamagnetic iron
oxide nanoparticles in beta-cell-targeted MRI. Biomaterials 2013;34:5843-5852
15. Wang P, Yoo B,
Yang J, Zhang X, Ross A, Pantazopoulos P, Dai G, Moore A: GLP-1R-targeting
magnetic nanoparticles for pancreatic islet imaging. Diabetes 2014;63:1465-1474
16. Vinet L,
Lamprianou S, Babic A, Lange N, Thorel F, Herrera PL, Montet X, Meda P:
Targeting GLP-1 receptors for repeated magnetic resonance imaging
differentiates graded losses of pancreatic beta cells in mice. Diabetologia
2015;58:304-312
17. Gepts W:
Pathologic anatomy of the pancreas in juvenile diabetes mellitus. Diabetes
1965;14:619-633
18. Bottazzo GF, Dean
BM, McNally JM, MacKay EH, Swift PG, Gamble DR: In situ characterization of
autoimmune phenomena and expression of HLA molecules in the pancreas in
diabetic insulitis. N Engl J Med 1985;313:353-360
19. Moore A, Grimm J,
Han B, Santamaria P: Tracking the recruitment of diabetogenic CD8+ T cells to
the pancreas in real time. Diabetes 2004;53:1459-1466
20. Medarova Z, Tsai
E, Evgenov N, Santamaria P, Moore A: In vivo imaging of a diabetogenic CD8+ T
cell response during type 1 diabetes progression. Magn Reson Med
2008;59:712-720
21. Gaglia J,
Guimaraes A, Harisinghani M, Turvey S, Jackson R, Benoist C, Mathis D,
Weissleder R: Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic islet inflammation in type 1A
diabetes patients. J Clin Invest 2011;121:442-445
22. Gaglia J,
Harisinghani M, Aganj I, Wojtkiewicz G, Hedgire S, Benoist C, Mathis D,
Weissleder R: Noninvasive mapping of pancreatic inflammation in recent-onset
type-1 diabetes patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:2139-2144
23. Medarova Z,
Castillo G, Dai G, Bolotin E, Bogdanov AJ, Moore A: Noninvasive magnetic
resonance imaging of microvascular changes in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes
2007;56:2677-2682
24. Medarova Z,
Greiner DL, Ifediba M, Dai G, Bolotin E, Castillo G, Bogdanov A, Kumar M, Moore
A: Imaging the pancreatic vasculature in diabetes models. Diabetes Metab Res
Rev 2011;27:767-772
25. Barnett BP,
Arepally A, Karmarkar PV, Qian D, Gilson WD, Walczak P, Howland V, Lawler L,
Lauzon C, Stuber M, Kraitchman DL, Bulte JW: Magnetic resonance-guided,
real-time targeted delivery and imaging of magnetocapsules immunoprotecting
pancreatic islet cells. Nat Med 2007;13:986-991
26. Barnett BP,
Arepally A, Stuber M, Arifin DR, Kraitchman DL, Bulte JW: Synthesis of magnetic
resonance-, X-ray- and ultrasound-visible alginate microcapsules for
immunoisolation and noninvasive imaging of cellular therapeutics. Nat Prot
2011;6:1142-1151
27. Barnett BP,
Ruiz-Cabello J, Hota P, Liddell R, Walczak P, Howland V, Chacko VP, Kraitchman
DL, Arepally A, Bulte JW: Fluorocapsules for improved function,
immunoprotection, and visualization of cellular therapeutics with MR, US, and
CT imaging. Radiology 2011;258:182-191
28. Medarova Z,
Evgenov NV, Dai G, Bonner-Weir S, Moore A: In vivo multimodal imaging of transplanted
pancreatic islets. Nat Prot 2006;1:429-435
29. Evgenov N,
Medarova Z, Dai G, Bonner-Weir S, Moore A: In vivo imaging of islet
transplantation. Nat Med 2006;12:144-148
30. Evgenov N,
Medarova Z, Pratt J, Pantazopoulos P, Leyting S, Bonner-Weir S, Moore A: In
vivo imaging of immune rejection in transplanted pancreatic islets. Diabetes
2006;55:2419-2428
31. Evgenov N, Pratt
J, Pantazopoulos P, Moore A: Effects of glucose toxicity and islet purity on in
vivo MR imaging of transplanted pancreatic islets. Transplantation
2008;85:1091-1098
32. Wang P, Schuetz C,
Ross A, Dai G, Markmann JF, Moore A: Immune rejection after pancreatic islet
cell transplantation: in vivo dual contrast-enhanced MR imaging in a mouse
model. Radiology 2013;266:822-830
33. Wang P, Schuetz C,
Vallabhajosyula P, Medarova Z, Tena A, Wei L, Yamada K, Deng S, Markmann JF,
Sachs DH, Moore A: Monitoring of Allogeneic Islet Grafts in Nonhuman Primates
Using MRI. Transplantation 2015;99:1574-1581
34. Toso C, Vallee JP,
Morel P, Ris F, Demuylder-Mischler S, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Marangon N, Saudek F,
James Shapiro AM, Bosco D, Berney T: Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of
pancreatic islet grafts after iron nanoparticle labeling. Am J Transplant
2008;8:701-706
35. Saudek F, Jirak D,
Girman P, Herynek V, Dezortova M, Kriz J, Peregrin J, Berkova Z, Zacharovova K,
Hajek M: Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic islets transplanted into the
liver in humans. Transplantation 2010;90:1602-1606