Bloch Equations & Typical MRI Contrast
Tobias Wech1

1Experimental Radiology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg

Synopsis

This presentation will provide an overview of the typical forms of the Bloch Equations, the physical mechanisms of relaxation phenomena as well as the basis of typical MRI contrasts.

Target Audience

MR physicists and engineers, pulse sequence developers and clinicians who want to deepen their understanding of MRI.

Outcome/Objectives

Understanding:

  • Typical Forms of the Bloch Equations and According Solutions
  • Physical Bases of Relaxation Phenomena
  • Typical MRI Contrasts

The Bloch Equations

In 1946 Felix Bloch introduced a set of differential equations describing the temporal evolution of the net magnetization of a spin system $$$ \vec{M} = M_x \cdot \hat{x} + M_y \cdot \hat{y} + M_z \cdot \hat{z}$$$ under the influence of external fields and relaxation effects [1]. These macroscopic and entirely phenomenological “equations of motion of the nuclear magnetization” serve as an excellent basis for describing a wide range of effects in magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

An elegant formulation can be achieved by using a reference system rotating around a static magnetic field $$$B_0$$$ along $$$\hat{z}$$$ (e.g. the main field of an MR-scanner: $$${\vec{B}}_0 = B_0\hat{z}$$$, which is usually switched on for all t, $$$\omega_0 = \gamma B_0$$$) at a frequency $$$\omega$$$ equally to the resonance frequency:

$$ \frac{d}{dt} \begin{bmatrix}M_x \\ M_y \\ M_z \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} -1/T_2 & \omega_0 - \omega & -\gamma B_{1,y} \\ \omega - \omega_0 & -1/T_2 & \gamma B_{1,x} \\ \gamma B_{1,y} & -\gamma B_{1,x} & -1/T_1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}M_x \\ M_y \\ M_z \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ M_0 / T_1 \end{bmatrix} \qquad (1)$$

$$${\vec{B}}_1$$$ is a magnetic field oscillating in the $$$\hat{x}$$$-$$$\hat{y}$$$-plane with amplitude $$$B_1$$$ and frequency $$$\omega_0$$$ which typically embodies RF-excitation, only active for short periods of time. $$$T_1$$$ and $$$T_2$$$ function as damping terms caused by relaxation phenomena driving the spin system back into an equilibrium state. By finding solutions of equation (1), MR-experiments can be simulated and ultimately, MR-signal behavior can be predicted.

Relaxation Phenomena

If a spin system in a static magnetic field $$${\vec{B}}_0 = B_0 \hat{z} $$$ has been disturbed from its equilibrium state, e.g. by some RF-excitation, $$$M_z$$$ exhibits an exponential relaxation towards its initial magnitude $$$M_0$$$ aligned with $$${\vec{B}}_0$$$. The time constant $$$T_1$$$ of this process is called longitudinal or spin-lattice relaxation time. The underlying process is an exchange of the energy, which was brought into the system by the perturbation, to other atoms in the molecule or the molecules as a whole [2].

After exciting the spin system, a component of the magnetization can be measured in the $$$\hat{x}$$$-$$$\hat{y}$$$-plane. Spins are initially in phase, however, the magnetic dipoles of the spins interact with each other, which immediately results in a dephasing of the spin system and ultimately in a decay of the signal. This transverse relaxation is also of exponential behavior, now governed by the time constant $$$T_2$$$ (transverse or spin-spin-relaxation time). Usually, $$$T_2$$$ is considerably smaller than $$$T_1$$$. Besides intrinsic inhomogeneities (i.e. interactions internal to the proton system) also external ones like inhomogeneities in $$$B_0$$$ or those caused by susceptibility interfaces drive the transversal relaxation. If the latter effects are incorporated, $$$T_2^*<T_2$$$ commonly represents the corresponding time constant.

For monomolecular (pure) substances, the Bloembergen-Purcell-Pound (BPP, [3]) theory provides a straightforward explanation of the underlying mechanisms of the $$$T_1$$$- and $$$T_2$$$-relaxation phenomena. Local magnetic field fluctuations evoked by molecular motion are modelled for a quantitative description. Refinements to this theory are necessary to reliably predict the relaxation times in more complicated, biological tissues.

Contrast Mechanisms in MRI

While the magnitude of the magnetization in equilibrium $$$M_0$$$ is in general governed by the spin density $$$\rho$$$, the relaxation times $$$T_1$$$ and $$$T_2$$$ substantially determine the contrast between tissues in clinical and biological MR imaging. The choice of the echo time TE and the repetition time TR of standard MR pulse sequences like spin- or gradient echo allows determining the grade of relaxation after excitation and thus the magnitude of the signal acquired. As $$$T_1$$$ and $$$T_2$$$ considerably differ between tissues (e.g. free water, fat, muscle etc.), image contrast can be adjusted in a very flexible manner by the measurement protocol.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Nuclear Induction. Bloch F. Physical Review 70:460-474 (1946)

[2] Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Bushong SC. Mosby (1996)

[3] Relaxation Effects in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Absorption. Bloembergen N, Purcell EM, Pound RV. Physical Review 73:679-746 (1948)


Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 25 (2017)